BACKGROUND: Wound assessment relies on visual evaluation by physicians. Such assessment is largely subjective and presents the opportunity to explore the use of emergent technologies. METHODS: Emergent and powerful noninvasive imaging technologies applicable to assess burn and chronic wounds are reviewed. RESULTS: The need to estimate wound depth is critical in both chronic wound and burn injury settings. Harmonic ultrasound technology is powerful to study wound depth. It addresses the limitations of optical imaging with limited depth of penetration. What if a wound appears epithelialized by visual inspection, which shows no discharge yet is covered by repaired skin that lacks barrier function? In this case although the wound is closed as defined by current standards, it remains functionally open, presenting the risk of infection and other postclosure complications. Thus, assessment of skin barrier function is valuable in the context of assessing wound closure. Options for the study of tissue vascularization are many. If noncontact and noninvasive criteria are of importance, laser speckle imaging is powerful. Fluorescence imaging is standard in several clinical settings and is likely to serve the wound clinics well as long as indocyanine green injection is not of concern. A major advantage of harmonic ultrasound imaging of wound depth is that the same system is capable of providing information on blood flow dynamics in arterial perforators. CONCLUSION: With many productive imaging platforms to choose from, wound care is about to be transformed by technology that would help assess wound severity.
BACKGROUND: Wound assessment relies on visual evaluation by physicians. Such assessment is largely subjective and presents the opportunity to explore the use of emergent technologies. METHODS: Emergent and powerful noninvasive imaging technologies applicable to assess burn and chronic wounds are reviewed. RESULTS: The need to estimate wound depth is critical in both chronic wound and burn injury settings. Harmonic ultrasound technology is powerful to study wound depth. It addresses the limitations of optical imaging with limited depth of penetration. What if a wound appears epithelialized by visual inspection, which shows no discharge yet is covered by repaired skin that lacks barrier function? In this case although the wound is closed as defined by current standards, it remains functionally open, presenting the risk of infection and other postclosure complications. Thus, assessment of skin barrier function is valuable in the context of assessing wound closure. Options for the study of tissue vascularization are many. If noncontact and noninvasive criteria are of importance, laser speckle imaging is powerful. Fluorescence imaging is standard in several clinical settings and is likely to serve the wound clinics well as long as indocyanine green injection is not of concern. A major advantage of harmonic ultrasound imaging of wound depth is that the same system is capable of providing information on blood flow dynamics in arterial perforators. CONCLUSION: With many productive imaging platforms to choose from, wound care is about to be transformed by technology that would help assess wound severity.
Authors: Jeffrey W Shupp; Teresa J Nasabzadeh; Dean S Rosenthal; Marion H Jordan; Philip Fidler; James C Jeng Journal: J Burn Care Res Date: 2010 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 1.845
Authors: Surya C Gnyawali; Kasturi G Barki; Shomita S Mathew-Steiner; Sriteja Dixith; Daniel Vanzant; Jayne Kim; Jennifer L Dickerson; Soma Datta; Heather Powell; Sashwati Roy; Valerie Bergdall; Chandan K Sen Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-03-23 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Cameron L Rink; Matthew M Wernke; Heather M Powell; Mark Tornero; Surya C Gnyawali; Ryan M Schroeder; Jayne Y Kim; Jeffrey A Denune; Alexander W Albury; Gayle M Gordillo; James M Colvin; Chandan K Sen Journal: Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle) Date: 2017-07-01 Impact factor: 4.730
Authors: Shuxin Li; Ali H Mohamedi; Jon Senkowsky; Ashwin Nair; Liping Tang Journal: Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle) Date: 2020-03-19 Impact factor: 4.730
Authors: Maximillian A Weigelt; Hadar A Lev-Tov; Marjana Tomic-Canic; W David Lee; Ryan Williams; David Strasfeld; Robert S Kirsner; Ira M Herman Journal: Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle) Date: 2021-07-21 Impact factor: 4.730
Authors: Marc G Jeschke; Margriet E van Baar; Mashkoor A Choudhry; Kevin K Chung; Nicole S Gibran; Sarvesh Logsetty Journal: Nat Rev Dis Primers Date: 2020-02-13 Impact factor: 52.329
Authors: Jason S Radowsky; Romon Neely; Jonathan A Forsberg; Felipe A Lisboa; Christopher J Dente; Eric A Elster; Nicole J Crane Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-09-27 Impact factor: 3.240