| Literature DB >> 25114925 |
Rashmi Mukherjee1, Dhiraj Dhane Manohar1, Dev Kumar Das1, Arun Achar2, Analava Mitra1, Chandan Chakraborty1.
Abstract
The aim of this paper was to develop a computer assisted tissue classification (granulation, necrotic, and slough) scheme for chronic wound (CW) evaluation using medical image processing and statistical machine learning techniques. The red-green-blue (RGB) wound images grabbed by normal digital camera were first transformed into HSI (hue, saturation, and intensity) color space and subsequently the "S" component of HSI color channels was selected as it provided higher contrast. Wound areas from 6 different types of CW were segmented from whole images using fuzzy divergence based thresholding by minimizing edge ambiguity. A set of color and textural features describing granulation, necrotic, and slough tissues in the segmented wound area were extracted using various mathematical techniques. Finally, statistical learning algorithms, namely, Bayesian classification and support vector machine (SVM), were trained and tested for wound tissue classification in different CW images. The performance of the wound area segmentation protocol was further validated by ground truth images labeled by clinical experts. It was observed that SVM with 3rd order polynomial kernel provided the highest accuracies, that is, 86.94%, 90.47%, and 75.53%, for classifying granulation, slough, and necrotic tissues, respectively. The proposed automated tissue classification technique achieved the highest overall accuracy, that is, 87.61%, with highest kappa statistic value (0.793).Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25114925 PMCID: PMC4121018 DOI: 10.1155/2014/851582
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Figure 1Work flow of the proposed computer assisted imaging tissue classification technique.
Figure 2Photographs of chronic wounds grabbed by a digital camera.
Figure 3Color conversion: (a-b) original RGB images; (c-d) S component images of (a-b) of HSI.
Figure 4Neighborhood with different values of radius (R) for calculating LBP.
Figure 5SVM based data classification.
Figure 6Segmented results of chronic wound areas using fuzzy divergence based thresholding: (a) original chronic wound images [burn, diabetic ulcer, malignant ulcer, pyoderma gangrenosum, venous ulcer, and pressure ulcer]; (b) saturation (S) component image under HSI color space transformation; (c) segmented wound areas; (d) ground truth marked by the clinician; (e) types of wound tissues (granulation, necrotic, and slough) characterized pseudocolored pixels; (e) representing % of granulation (G), slough (S), and necrotic (N) tissue pixels.
Classification matrix of wound tissue pixels using Bayesian learning.
| Original | Predicted pixels | Tissue-wise accuracy | Overall accuracy | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Granulation | Slough | Necrotic | (%) | ||
| Granulation | 192 | 21 | 9 | 86.48 | 81.15% |
| Slough | 67 | 353 | 31 | 78.27 | |
| Necrotic | 5 | 15 | 74 | 78.72 | |
Wound pixel classification matrix using SVM learning models.
| SVM | Original | Predicted pixels | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Granulation | Slough | Necrotic | ||
| Linear kernel | Granulation | 184 | 35 | 3 |
| Slough | 50 | 390 | 11 | |
| Necrotic | 14 | 34 | 46 | |
|
| ||||
| 2nd order polynomial | Granulation | 182 | 33 | 7 |
| Slough | 38 | 400 | 13 | |
| Necrotic | 5 | 22 | 69 | |
|
| ||||
| 3rd order polynomial | Granulation | 195 | 23 | 4 |
| Slough | 31 | 410 | 10 | |
| Necrotic | 3 | 16 | 75 | |
|
| ||||
| RBF kernel | Granulation | 184 | 32 | 6 |
| Slough | 39 | 401 | 11 | |
| Necrotic | 4 | 20 | 70 | |
Performance evaluation of various classifiers for wound tissue classification.
| Statistical learning schemes | Tissue-wise accuracy (%) | Overall accuracy (%) | Kappa statistic | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Granulation | Slough | Necrotic | |||
| Bayesian classifier | 86.48 | 78.27 | 78.72 | 81.15 | 0.704 |
| SVM with linear kernel | 82.88 | 86.47 | 48.93 | 72.76 | 0.653 |
| SVM with 2nd polynomial kernel | 81.98 | 88.69 | 73.40 | 81.35 | 0.718 |
| SVM with 3rd polynomial kernel |
|
|
|
|
|
| SVM with RBF kernel | 82.88 | 88.91 | 74.46 | 80.08 | 0.697 |