Literature DB >> 22309091

Multi-directional in vivo tensile skin stiffness measurement for the design of a reproducible tensile strain elastography protocol.

Louise Coutts1, Jeffrey Bamber, Naomi Miller.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Elastography is a promising new medical imaging modality, displaying spatial distribution of biomechanical properties such as local tissue strain response to an applied stress. To develop a reproducible test protocol for skin elastography, the effect of various parameters on skin stiffness measurements was investigated.
METHODS: The parameters investigated were: history of skin loading before test loading (preconditioning), direction of test loading (anisotropy) and posture (pre-stress). If a sample of skin is loaded, its stiffness will temporarily change. Finally, the reproducibility of skin stiffness and anisotropy measurements, using the developed techniques, was investigated.
RESULTS: By measuring how the stiffness changed with different time delays between loading cycles, the time required for healthy skin to return to its original pre-loaded state was in the region of 125 s. A second finding, which supports and extends previous work, was that skin stiffness varied with direction, by an approximate factor of 2, and that anisotropy was less apparent with preconditioned skin than non-preconditioned skin. Study of the effect of posture showed that care needs to be taken over which stiffness measure is used. For example, measurement of the load at a given displacement was found to be highly dependent on posture, whereas measurement of the phase III stiffness was independent of posture.
CONCLUSION: It was shown that when the measurement variables and methods of analysis were standardised, skin stiffness could be measured reproducibly enough to distinguish between the stiffest and softest directions, and that these methods allowed formation of skin elastograms free from confounding influences.
© 2012 John Wiley & Sons A/S.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22309091     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0846.2011.00604.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Skin Res Technol        ISSN: 0909-752X            Impact factor:   2.365


  3 in total

Review 1.  Cutaneous Imaging Technologies in Acute Burn and Chronic Wound Care.

Authors:  Chandan K Sen; Subhadip Ghatak; Surya C Gnyawali; Sashwati Roy; Gayle M Gordillo
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 4.730

2.  The Compressiometer: Toward a New Skin Tensiometer for Research and Surgical Planning.

Authors:  Karlijn M J Scheepens; Nick Marsidi; Roel E Genders; Tim Horeman-Franse
Journal:  IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 3.316

3.  High-resolution harmonics ultrasound imaging for non-invasive characterization of wound healing in a pre-clinical swine model.

Authors:  Surya C Gnyawali; Kasturi G Barki; Shomita S Mathew-Steiner; Sriteja Dixith; Daniel Vanzant; Jayne Kim; Jennifer L Dickerson; Soma Datta; Heather Powell; Sashwati Roy; Valerie Bergdall; Chandan K Sen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-23       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.