| Literature DB >> 27555216 |
Da Jing1, Mingming Zhai1, Shichao Tong1, Fei Xu2, Jing Cai3, Guanghao Shen1, Yan Wu4, Xiaokang Li4, Kangning Xie1, Juan Liu1, Qiaoling Xu5, Erping Luo1.
Abstract
Treatment of <span class="Disease">osseous defects remains a formidable clinical challenge. Porous <span class="Chemical">titanium alloys (pTi) have been emerging as ideal endosseous implants due to the excellent biocompatibility and structural properties, whereas inadequate osseointegration poses risks for unreliable long-term implant stability. Substantial evidence indicates that pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMF), as a safe noninvasive method, inhibit osteopenia/osteoporosis experimentally and clinically. We herein investigated the efficiency and potential mechanisms of PEMF on osteogenesis and osseointegration of pTi in vitro and in vivo. We demonstrate that PEMF enhanced cellular attachment and proliferation, and induced well-organized cytoskeleton for in vitro osteoblasts seeded in pTi. PEMF promoted gene expressions in Runx2, OSX, COL-1 and Wnt/β-catenin signaling. PEMF-stimulated group exhibited higher Runx2, Wnt1, Lrp6 and β-catenin protein expressions. In vivo results via μCT and histomorphometry show that 6-week and 12-week PEMF promoted osteogenesis, bone ingrowth and bone formation rate of pTi in rabbit femoral bone defect. PEMF promoted femoral gene expressions of Runx2, BMP2, OCN and Wnt/β-catenin signaling. Together, we demonstrate that PEMF improve osteogenesis and osseointegration of pTi by promoting skeletal anabolic activities through a Wnt/β-catenin signaling-associated mechanism. PEMF might become a promising biophysical modality for enhancing the repair efficiency and quality of pTi in bone defect.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27555216 PMCID: PMC4995433 DOI: 10.1038/srep32045
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Characterization of pTi samples, PEMF system setups and in vivo experiment protocol.
(A) Gross view and μCT scanning of pTi samples for in vitro and in vivo experiments. (B) Microstructural observation of pTi implants via SEM scanning. (C) Surgical photograph showing the cylindrical bone defect with 6.0 mm diameter and 8.0 mm length created in the femoral lateral condyle. A pTi implant was then transplanted into the bone defect sites and the accuracy of the defect location was further confirmed via X-ray scanning. (D) Schematic representation of the PEMF generator together with a Helmholtz coil assembly with three-coil array. The PEMF output waveform consisted of a pulsed burst (burst width, 5 ms; pulse width, 0.2 ms; pulse wait, 0.02 ms; burst wait, 60 ms; pulse rise, 0.3 μs; pulse fall, 2.0 μs) repeated at 15 Hz. The peak magnetic field within the Helmholtz coils was approximately 2.0 mT. (E) The experimental protocols for the present in vivo investigation.
The sequence of primers used in the present study for in vitro real-time fluorescence quantitative PCR.
| Genes | Primers | Primer Sequence (5′-3′) | Product Length (bp) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Runx-2 | Forward | TGCACCTACCAGCCTCACCATAC | 105 |
| Reverse | GACAGCGACTTCATTCGACTTCC | ||
| Osx | Forward | TATGGCTCGTGGTACAAG | 200 |
| Reverse | TCAGATGGGTAAGTAGGC | ||
| COL-1 | Forward | GAAGGCTGGAGAGCGAG | 132 |
| Reverse | CGGGACCTTGTTCACCTC | ||
| Wnt1 | Forward | ATTTTGGTCGCCTCTTTG | 140 |
| Reverse | GTGGCATTTGCACTCTTG | ||
| Lrp6 | Forward | CAGCACCACAGGCCACCAA | 227 |
| Reverse | TCGAGACATTCCTGGAAGAG | ||
| β-catenin | Forward | GGAAAGCAAGCTCATCATTCT | 171 |
| Reverse | AGTGCCTGCATCCCACCA | ||
| β-Actin | Forward | GCCAACACAGTGCTGTCT | 114 |
| Reverse | AGGAGCAATGATCTTGATCTT |
The sequence of primers used in the present study for real-time fluorescence quantitative PCR analysis in rabbit bones.
| Genes | Primers | Primer Sequence (5′-3′) | Product Length (bp) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Runx-2 | Forward | CAGTCTTACCCCTCTTACC | 130 |
| Reverse | CATCTTTACCTGAAATGCG | ||
| BMP2 | Forward | GGACGACATCCTGAGCGAGT | 117 |
| Reverse | CGGCGGTACAAGTCCAGCAT | ||
| Osteocalcin | Forward | TTGGTGCACACCTAGCAGAC | 216 |
| Reverse | ACCTTATTGCCCTCCTGCTT | ||
| Wnt1 | Forward | CTCCACGAACCTGCTAACTG | 226 |
| Reverse | GACGATCTTGCCGAAGAGG | ||
| Lrp6 | Forward | GCTTGGCACTTGTATGTAAA | 179 |
| Reverse | TGGGCTAAGATCATCAGACT | ||
| β-catenin | Forward | GACACGGACCACACGCACAA | 173 |
| Reverse | CCGAGCAGCAGCAAGTCTTCT | ||
| GAPDH | Forward | CATCATCCCTGCCTCCACTG | 183 |
| Reverse | GATGCCTGCTTCACCACCTT |
Figure 2Effects of PEMF exposure on in vitro cellular attachment, proliferation and morphology for osteoblasts seeded in pTi.
(A) Comparisons of in vitro osteoblast attachment between the Control and PEMF exposure groups via DAPI staining (n = 15). (B) Representative in vitro FITC cytoskeleton staining images of osteoblasts in the Control and PEMF exposure groups. Scale bar represents 50 μm for all images. (C) Comparisons of in vitro osteoblast proliferation between the Control and PEMF groups via MTT assays (n = 9). MTT was added into in vitro MC3T3-E1 cells to form the formazan, and DMSO was then added to dissolve the formazan. The optical density (OD) values of the mixture were determined at 490 nm with the multimode microplate reader. (D) Representative SEM scanning for in vitro osteoblasts in the Control and PEMF groups. Scale bar represents 10 μm for all images. Values are all expressed as mean ± S.D. *Significant difference from the Control group with P < 0.05.
Figure 3Effects of PEMF exposure on in vitro osteogenesis-related gene expressions for osteoblasts seeded in pTi via semi-quantitative RT-PCR analyses, including Runx2, Osx, COL-1, Wnt1, Lrp6 and β-catenin.
Values are all expressed as mean ± S.D. (n = 8 ~ 11) and the relative expression level of each gene was normalized to β-Actin. *Significant difference from the Control group with P < 0.05.
Figure 4Effects of PEMF exposure on in vitro osteogenesis-related protein expressions for osteoblasts seeded in pTi via western blotting analyses, including Runx2, Wnt1, Lrp6 and β-catenin.
Values are all expressed as mean ± S.D. (n = 3 ~ 4). The relative protein expression levels of Runx2 and β-catenin were normalized to β-Actin, and the relative protein expressions of Wnt1 and Lrp6 was normalized to β-Tubulin. *Significant difference from the Control group with P < 0.05.
Figure 5Effects of 6-week and 12-week PEMF exposure on the osseointegration of pTi implants in the region of bone defect via μCT scanning.
A tube volume with 6.0 mm diameter and 8.0 mm length was defined as the volume of interest (VOI), which completely covered the region of the pTi implant. (A) Reconstructed 3-D μCT images determined by the VOI and 2-D mid-coronal and mid-sagittal slices. The regions with white color represent titanium alloys and the areas with yellow color represent cancellous bones. (B) Quantitative comparisons of μCT characteristic parameters of trabecular bones between the Control and PEMF groups (n = 6), including bone volume per tissue volume (BV/TV), bone surface per bone volume (BS/BV), trabecular number (Tb.N), trabecular thickness (Tb.Th) and trabecular separation (Tb.Sp). Values are all expressed as mean ± S.D. *Significant difference from the Control group at 6 weeks with P < 0.05. #Significant difference from the Control group at 12 weeks with P < 0.05.
Figure 6Effects of 6-week and 12-week PEMF exposure on cancellous bone histology in the region of bone defect via Masson-Goldner trichrome staining.
(A) Representative histological images for bone microarchitecture in the region of bone defect by Masson-Goldner trichrome staining. The black areas represent titanium alloys and the red areas represent cancellous bones. Scale bar represents 100 μm for all images. (B) Quantitative comparisons of bone area fraction (bone area per total area) determined by the histological analyses between the Control and PEMF groups (n = 6). Values are all expressed as mean ± S.D. *Significant difference from the Control group at 6 weeks with P < 0.05. #Significant difference from the Control group at 12 weeks with P < 0.05.
Figure 7Effects of 6-week and 12-week PEMF exposure on dynamic histomorphometric parameters in the region of bone defect via calcein double-labeling analyses.
(A) Representative calcein double-labeling sections in the region of bone defect. Scale bar represents 100 μm for all images. (B) Quantitative comparisons of the dynamic histomorphometric parameters, including mineral apposition rate (MAR), mineralizing surface per bone surface (MS/BS) and bone formation rate per bone surface (BFR/BS) between the Control and PEMF groups (n = 6). Values are all expressed as mean ± S.D. *Significant difference from the Control group at 6 weeks with P < 0.05. #Significant difference from the Control group at 12 weeks with P < 0.05.
Figure 8Effects of 6-week and 12-week PEMF exposure on in vivo osteogenesis-related gene expressions in rabbit femora via semi-quantitative RT-PCR analyses, including Runx2, BMP2, OCN, Wnt1, Lrp6 and β-catenin.
Values are all expressed as mean ± S.D. (n = 6) and the relative expression level of each gene was normalized to GAPDH. *Significant difference from the Control group with P < 0.05.