| Literature DB >> 28883516 |
Jianjun Li1,2, Zhaobin Zeng3, Yantao Zhao4, Da Jing5, Chuhua Tang2, Yin Ding6, Xue Feng7.
Abstract
Type 2 <<span class="Gene">span class="Disease">diabeticspan> <spaspan>n class="Species">patients have impaired bone quality, leading to increased <span class="Disease">fracture risk. Substantial evidence demonstrates that pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMF) could resist osteopenia/osteoporosis induced by estrogen deficiency and disuse. However, the effects of PEMF on osteopenia/osteoporosis associated with diabetes, especially for more prevalent type 2 diabetes, remain poorly understood. We herein investigated the skeletal effects and mechanisms of PEMF (15 Hz, 20 Gs) on leptin receptor-deficient db/db mice with typical type 2 diabetic symptoms. Our µCT results showed that 12-week PEMF exposure significantly improved both cancellous and cortical bone microarchitecture in db/db mice. Three-point bending and biomechanical indentation testing demonstrated that PEMF improved whole-bone structural properties and tissue-level material properties in db/db mice. PEMF significantly promoted bone formation in db/db mice evidenced by increased serum osteocalcin and bone mineral apposition rate, whereas PEMF exerted no observable alteration in bone resorption. Real-time PCR showed that PEMF upregulated tibial gene expression of osteoblastogenesis-related of canonical Wnt/β-catenin signaling but not osteoclastogenesis-related RANKL-RANK signaling in db/db mice. Our findings demonstrate that PEMF improved bone quantity and quality with obvious anabolic activities in db/db mice, and imply that PEMF might become a clinically applicable treatment modality for improving bone quality in type 2 diabetic patients.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28883516 PMCID: PMC5589741 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-11090-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Schematic representation of the PEMF apparatus and PEMF waveform. The PEMF exposure system consisted of a signal generator and a Helmholtz coil assembly with three coils. The three coils (80-cm diameter) were placed coaxially with 30.4 cm apart from each other, and the numbers of turns of the central coil and outside coils were 266 turns and 500 turns, respectively. The bottom of the plastic mouse cage was aligned with the center of the coils to ensure that the mice were confined in the center of the electromagnetic fields. The PEMF waveform consisted of a pulsed burst (burst width, 5 ms; pulse width, 0.2 ms; pulse wait, 0.02 ms; burst wait, 60 ms; pulse rise and fall times: 0.3 μs and 2.0 μs) repeated at 15 Hz. The peak magnetic field generated at the center of the Helmholtz coils was approximately 2.0 mT.
The sequence of primers used in the current study for Real-time PCR analysis.
| Genes | Forward primer (5′-3′) | Reverse primer (5′-3′) |
|---|---|---|
| Osteocalcin | GTGTGAGCTTAACCCTGC | ACAGGGAGGATCAAGTCC |
| Runx2 | TGCACCTACCAGCCTCACCATAC | GACAGCGACTTCATTCGACTTCC |
| BMP2 | AGAAAAGCAACAGAAGCC | GACCGCAGTCCGTCTAAG |
| OPG | ACCAAAGTGAATGCCGAGAGAG | ACGCTGCTTTCACAGAGGTC |
| RANKL | GGGGAGGCAACTGTCACCTT | TAGTCTGTAGGTACGCTTCC |
| RANK | CACGGTGGATTCTGAGGGCT | GGGGAGGCAACTGTCACCTT |
| Wnt3a | CTCCTCTGCAGCCTGAAGC | GTGGACGGTGGTGCAGTT |
| Lrp6 | CAGCACCACAGGCCACCAA | TCGAGACATTCCTGGAAGAG |
| β-catenin | GGAAAGCAAGCTCATCATTCT | AGTGCCTGCATCCCACCA |
| β-actin | GCCAACACAGTGCTGTCT | AGGAGCAATGATCTTGATCTT |
Figure 2Effect of PEMF stimulation on body weight, blood glucose and serum bone turnover markers in db/db mice. The db/db mice showed significantly higher body weight (A) and blood glucose (B) than the WT group both before and after 12-week experiment, whereas 12-weeek PEMF exposure exhibited no apparent effect on body weight or blood glucose in db/db mice. The db/db mice also exhibited decrease in bone formation marker (C) osteocalcin (OCN) and increase in bone resorption marker (D) tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b (TRACP5b). PEMF promoted serum OCN secretion, whereas PEMF displayed no observable effect on serum TRACP5b expression. WT, the wild-type mice group; db/db, the db/db mice group; PEMF, the db/db mice with PEMF stimulation group. Values are all expressed as mean ± S.D. (n = 9). *Significant difference from the WT group with P < 0.05; #Significant difference from the db/db group with P < 0.05.
Figure 3Effect of PEMF exposure on trabecular bone microarchitecture in distal femora and cortical bone thickness in femoral mid-diaphysis of db/db mice via µCT analysis. A volume of interest (VOI) with 1.0-mm height started at a distance of 0.5 mm from the lowest end of the growth plate of the distal femur and extended to the proximal end with a distance of 1.0 mm was selected for quantifying cancellous bone microstructure, which only contained the second spongiosa. Another VOI with 2.0-mm height was selected to analyze the cortical bone structure of the femoral mid-diaphysis. (A~B) Representative µCT images showing obvious deterioration of both cancellous and cortical bone microstructure in db/db mice were ameliorated after 12-week exposure to PEMF. (C~H) Statistical quantification of trabecular and cortical bone microarchitecture parameters, including (C) bone volume per tissue volume (BV/TV), (D) trabecular number (Tb.N), (E) trabecular thickness (Tb.Th), (F) trabecular separation (Tb.Sp), (G) cortical thickness (Ct.Th) and (H) cortical area (Ct.Th). PEMF stimulation for 12 weeks significantly improved cancellous and cortical bone microarchitecture in db/db mice. WT, the wild-type mice group; db/db, the db/db mice group; PEMF, the db/db mice with PEMF stimulation group. Values are all expressed as mean ± S.D. (n = 9). *Significant difference from the WT group with P < 0.05; #Significant difference from the db/db group with P < 0.05.
Figure 4Effect of 12 weeks of PEMF stimulation on dynamic bone formation in db/db mice. (A) Representative calcein double-labeling images in femoral endocortical bone surfaces. Scale bar represents 100 µm. (B~C) Comparisons of dynamic histomorphometric parameters of endocortical bone between the WT, db/db and PEMF groups via double labeling with calcein, including (B) mineral apposition rate (MAR) and (C) bone formation rate per bone surface (BFR/BS). The bone formation rate in db/db mice was significantly increased after exposure to 12-week PEMF stimulation. WT, the wild-type mice group; db/db, the db/db mice group; PEMF, the db/db mice with PEMF stimulation group. Values are all expressed as mean ± S.D. (n = 9). *Significant difference from the WT group with P < 0.05; #Significant difference from the db/db group with P < 0.05.
Figure 5Effect of PEMF stimulation on femoral biomechanical structural and material properties in db/db mice. Three-point bending results showed that the decreases of femoral (A) maximum load and (B) stiffness in db/db mice were significantly inhibited after 12-week exposure to PEMF. (C) Representative load-displacement curves of biomechanical indentation testing on mouse trabecular bone in the three groups. (D and E) Statistical comparisons of cancellous bone material properties via biomechanical indentation testing in the three groups, including (D) elastic modulus and (E) hardness. Our biomechanical indentation results demonstrated that PEMF stimulation led to significant improvement of cancellous bone material properties in db/db mice. WT, the wild-type mice group; db/db, the db/db mice group; PEMF, the db/db mice with PEMF stimulation group. Values are all expressed as mean ± S.D. (n = 9). *Significant difference from the WT group with P < 0.05; #Significant difference from the db/db group with P < 0.05.
Figure 6Effect of PEMF stimulation on gene expression in the mid-diaphysis of the tibia (5.0-mm length) with removal of bone marrow in db/db mice via qRT-PCR analyses, including (A) OCN, (B) Runx2, (C) BMP2, (D) OPG, (E) RANKL, (F) RANK, (G) Wnt3a, (H) LRP6, and (I) β-catenin mRNA expression. The left tibiae of all mice in the three groups (n = 9 in each group) were used for qRT-PCR analysis. Each sample was run for Real-Time PCR analysis in triplicate in a 96-well plate, and the relative quantity of mRNA (normalized to the house-keeping gene β-actin content) was calculated using 2−ΔΔCt relative quantification methods. The mRNA data in the WT and PEMF groups were expressed as fold increase over levels in the db/db group. All qRT-PCR reactions for each tibial sample were performed three times. WT, the wild-type mice group; db/db, the db/db mice group; PEMF, the db/db mice with PEMF stimulation group. Values are all expressed as mean ± S.D. (n = 9). *Significant difference from the WT group with P < 0.05; #Significant difference from the db/db group with P < 0.05.
Figure 7Effect of PEMF stimulation on the canonical Wnt signaling protein expression in the mid-diaphysis of the tibia (0.8-mm length) with removal of bone marrow in db/db mice. The right tibiae of 4 mice in the three groups (n = 4 in each group) were used for western blotting analysis. (A) Representative western blotting results in the Wnt3a, Lrp6, and β-catenin protein expression in the three groups. (B~D) Statistical comparisons of protein expression of the canonical Wnt signaling between the WT, db/db and PEMF groups via western blotting analysis, including (B) Wnt3a, (C) Lrp6, and (D) β-catenin. The data were normalized to the house-keeping gene β-tubulin content. The data in the WT and PEMF groups were expressed as fold increase over levels in the db/db group. WT, the wild-type mice group; db/db, the db/db mice group; PEMF, the db/db mice with PEMF stimulation group. Values are all expressed as mean ± S.D. (n = 4). *Significant difference from the WT group with P < 0.05; #Significant difference from the db/db group with P < 0.05.