Literature DB >> 27553452

Estimating contemporary effective population size in non-model species using linkage disequilibrium across thousands of loci.

R K Waples1, W A Larson1, R S Waples2.   

Abstract

Contemporary effective population size (Ne) can be estimated using linkage disequilibrium (LD) observed across pairs of loci presumed to be selectively neutral and unlinked. This method has been commonly applied to data sets containing 10-100 loci to inform conservation and study population demography. Performance of these Ne estimates could be improved by incorporating data from thousands of loci. However, these thousands of loci exist on a limited number of chromosomes, ensuring that some fraction will be physically linked. Linked loci have elevated LD due to limited recombination, which if not accounted for can cause Ne estimates to be downwardly biased. Here, we present results from coalescent and forward simulations designed to evaluate the bias of LD-based Ne estimates ([Ncirc ]e). Contrary to common perceptions, increasing the number of loci does not increase the magnitude of linkage. Although we show it is possible to identify some pairs of loci that produce unusually large r(2) values, simply removing large r(2) values is not a reliable way to eliminate bias. Fortunately, the magnitude of bias in [Ncirc ]e is strongly and negatively correlated with the process of recombination, including the number of chromosomes and their length, and this relationship provides a general way to adjust for bias. Additionally, we show that with thousands of loci, precision of [Ncirc ]e is much lower than expected based on the assumption that each pair of loci provides completely independent information.

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27553452      PMCID: PMC5026758          DOI: 10.1038/hdy.2016.60

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)        ISSN: 0018-067X            Impact factor:   3.821


  33 in total

1.  Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: linked loci and correlated allele frequencies.

Authors:  Daniel Falush; Matthew Stephens; Jonathan K Pritchard
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  SIMCOAL 2.0: a program to simulate genomic diversity over large recombining regions in a subdivided population with a complex history.

Authors:  Guillaume Laval; Laurent Excoffier
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2004-04-29       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  Modelling evolutionary processes in small populations: not as ideal as you think.

Authors:  Robin S Waples; James R Faulkner
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2009-03-31       Impact factor: 6.185

4.  Estimating contemporary effective population size on the basis of linkage disequilibrium in the face of migration.

Authors:  Robin S Waples; Phillip R England
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  ldne: a program for estimating effective population size from data on linkage disequilibrium.

Authors:  Robin S Waples; Chi DO
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 7.090

6.  Inferences about linkage disequilibrium.

Authors:  B S Weir
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Population differentiation determined from putative neutral and divergent adaptive genetic markers in Eulachon (Thaleichthys pacificus, Osmeridae), an anadromous Pacific smelt.

Authors:  John R Candy; Nathan R Campbell; Matthew H Grinnell; Terry D Beacham; Wesley A Larson; Shawn R Narum
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2015-03-23       Impact factor: 7.090

Review 8.  Linkage disequilibrium--understanding the evolutionary past and mapping the medical future.

Authors:  Montgomery Slatkin
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 53.242

9.  A dense SNP-based linkage map for Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) reveals extended chromosome homeologies and striking differences in sex-specific recombination patterns.

Authors:  Sigbjørn Lien; Lars Gidskehaug; Thomas Moen; Ben J Hayes; Paul R Berg; William S Davidson; Stig W Omholt; Matthew P Kent
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2011-12-19       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  SNeP: a tool to estimate trends in recent effective population size trajectories using genome-wide SNP data.

Authors:  Mario Barbato; Pablo Orozco-terWengel; Miika Tapio; Michael W Bruford
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 4.599

View more
  41 in total

1.  Effective population size in ecology and evolution.

Authors:  M Husemann; F E Zachos; R J Paxton; J C Habel
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  A method for detecting recent changes in contemporary effective population size from linkage disequilibrium at linked and unlinked loci.

Authors:  C M Hollenbeck; D S Portnoy; J R Gold
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 3.821

3.  Estimation of contemporary effective population size and population declines using RAD sequence data.

Authors:  Schyler O Nunziata; David W Weisrock
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 3.821

4.  Small population size and low genomic diversity have no effect on fitness in experimental translocations of a wild fish.

Authors:  M C Yates; E Bowles; D J Fraser
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Linkage disequilibrium under polysomic inheritance.

Authors:  Kang Huang; Derek W Dunn; Wenkai Li; Dan Wang; Baoguo Li
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 3.821

6.  Multi-population puma connectivity could restore genomic diversity to at-risk coastal populations in California.

Authors:  Kyle D Gustafson; Roderick B Gagne; Michael R Buchalski; T Winston Vickers; Seth P D Riley; Jeff A Sikich; Jaime L Rudd; Justin A Dellinger; Melanie E F LaCava; Holly B Ernest
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 5.183

7.  Pronghorn population genomics show connectivity in the core of their range.

Authors:  Melanie E F LaCava; Roderick B Gagne; Sierra M Love Stowell; Kyle D Gustafson; C Alex Buerkle; Lee Knox; Holly B Ernest
Journal:  J Mammal       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 2.416

8.  Genome-wide SNPs detect no evidence of genetic population structure for reef manta rays (Mobula alfredi) in southern Mozambique.

Authors:  Stephanie K Venables; Andrea D Marshall; Amelia J Armstrong; Joseph L Tomkins; W Jason Kennington
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 3.821

9.  Single nucleotide polymorphism-based analysis of the genetic structure of Liangshan pig population.

Authors:  Bin Liu; Linyuan Shen; Zhixian Guo; Mailing Gan; Ying Chen; Runling Yang; Lili Niu; Dongmei Jiang; Zhijun Zhong; Xuewei Li; Shunhua Zhang; Li Zhu
Journal:  Anim Biosci       Date:  2020-05-12

10.  Pseudoreplication in genomic-scale data sets.

Authors:  Robin S Waples; Ryan K Waples; Eric J Ward
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2021-09-07       Impact factor: 8.678

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.