Literature DB >> 27553043

Humans Can Taste Glucose Oligomers Independent of the hT1R2/hT1R3 Sweet Taste Receptor.

Trina J Lapis1, Michael H Penner1, Juyun Lim1.   

Abstract

It is widely accepted that humans can taste mono- and disaccharides as sweet substances, but they cannot taste longer chain oligo- and polysaccharides. From the evolutionary standpoint, the ability to taste starch or its oligomeric hydrolysis products would be highly adaptive, given their nutritional value. Here, we report that humans can taste glucose oligomer preparations (average degree of polymerization 7 and 14) without any other sensorial cues. The same human subjects could not taste the corresponding glucose polymer preparation (average degree of polymerization 44). When the sweet taste receptor was blocked by lactisole, a known sweet inhibitor, subjects could not detect sweet substances (glucose, maltose, and sucralose), but they could still detect the glucose oligomers. This suggests that glucose oligomer detection is independent of the hT1R2/hT1R3 sweet taste receptor. Human subjects described the taste of glucose oligomers as "starchy," while they describe sugars as "sweet." The dose-response function of glucose oligomer was also found to be indistinguishable from that of glucose on a molar basis.
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  carbohydrates; glucose oligomers; receptor; starchy; taste

Year:  2016        PMID: 27553043     DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bjw088

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Senses        ISSN: 0379-864X            Impact factor:   3.160


  14 in total

1.  Glucose elicits cephalic-phase insulin release in mice by activating KATP channels in taste cells.

Authors:  John I Glendinning; Yonina G Frim; Ayelet Hochman; Gabrielle S Lubitz; Anthony J Basile; Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 3.619

2.  Flavor preferences conditioned by nutritive and non-nutritive sweeteners in mice.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Karen Ackroff
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2017-02-10

Review 3.  From appetite setpoint to appetition: 50years of ingestive behavior research.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2018-01-02

Review 4.  Impact of oral processing on texture attributes and taste perception.

Authors:  Dengyong Liu; Yajun Deng; Lei Sha; Md Abul Hashem; Shengmei Gai
Journal:  J Food Sci Technol       Date:  2017-05-29       Impact factor: 2.701

Review 5.  Taste buds: cells, signals and synapses.

Authors:  Stephen D Roper; Nirupa Chaudhari
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 6.  Carbohydrate craving: not everything is sweet.

Authors:  Yue Ma; Risheka Ratnasabapathy; James Gardiner
Journal:  Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 4.294

7.  Behavioral evidence that select carbohydrate stimuli activate T1R-independent receptor mechanisms.

Authors:  Alan C Spector; Lindsey A Schier
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2016-12-26       Impact factor: 3.868

8.  Taste perception of cyclic oligosaccharides: α, β, and γ cyclodextrins.

Authors:  Laura E Martin; Juyun Lim
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 3.160

9.  Chromatographic preparation of food-grade prebiotic oligosaccharides with defined degree of polymerization.

Authors:  Megan C Y Ooi; Xiaojie Zhang; Christopher M Beaudry; Juyun Lim; Michael H Penner
Journal:  Food Chem       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 7.514

10.  Detection of maltodextrin and its discrimination from sucrose are independent of the T1R2 + T1R3 heterodimer.

Authors:  Kimberly R Smith; Alan C Spector
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 3.619

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.