Literature DB >> 28130651

Screening and Surveillance of Colorectal Cancer Using CT Colonography.

Manoj Kumar1, Brooks D Cash2.   

Abstract

OPINION STATEMENT: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a common cancer among throughout the world with the highest rates in developed countries such as the USA. There is ample evidence demonstrating the beneficial effects of colorectal cancer screening and, largely thanks to screening initiatives and insurance coverage, epidemiologic analyses show a steady decline in both CRC incidence and mortality rates over the last several decades. However, screening rates for CRC in the US remain low and approximately 1 in 3 adults between the ages of 50 and 75 years has not undergone any form of CRC screening, highlighting the need for additional accurate, minimally invasive, and acceptable screening options. Computed tomography colonography (CTC) has emerged as a viable alternative to existing CRC screening tests and research continues to enhance our knowledge regarding the ability of CTC to play a meaningful role in optimizing CRC screening in areas where it is available. This review highlights recent publications of salient research in the field of CTC. CTC continues to evolve, with lower radiation doses and greater evidence of its ability to identify clinical relevant colonic and extracolonic abnormalities. Recent evidence has bolstered the currently recommended CTC screening interval of 5 years and has reiterated the cost-effectiveness of CTC as a CRC screening examination. Additionally, emerging evidence suggests a role for CTC as a polyp and CRC surveillance modality as well as a preoperative adjunct in patients with established CRC. Data supporting the safety and patient acceptance of CTC also has continued to accumulate and CTC has recently been endorsed as an appropriate test for CRC screening in multiple important guidelines and recommendations. CTC is poised to become an important option in the CRC screening and surveillance arena.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CT colonography; Colon polyp detection; Colorectal cancer screening; Colorectal cancer surveillance; Virtual colonoscopy

Year:  2017        PMID: 28130651     DOI: 10.1007/s11938-017-0121-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1092-8472


  69 in total

Review 1.  CT colonography: Why? When? How?

Authors:  C Ridereau-Zins; F Pilleul; Y Gandon; V Laurent
Journal:  Diagn Interv Imaging       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 4.026

2.  Prospective evaluation of complications in outpatient GI endoscopy: a survey among German gastroenterologists.

Authors:  A Sieg; U Hachmoeller-Eisenbach; T Eisenbach
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 3.  An international review of the main cost-effectiveness drivers of virtual colonography versus conventional colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening: is the tide changing due to adherence?

Authors:  Christine Kriza; Martin Emmert; Philip Wahlster; Charlotte Niederländer; Peter Kolominsky-Rabas
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2013-08-12       Impact factor: 3.528

Review 4.  Cost-effectiveness of computed tomography colonography in colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review.

Authors:  Paul Hanly; Mairead Skally; Helen Fenlon; Linda Sharp
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  2012-09-24       Impact factor: 2.188

5.  Assessment of volumetric growth rates of small colorectal polyps with CT colonography: a longitudinal study of natural history.

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt; David H Kim; B Dustin Pooler; J Louis Hinshaw; Duncan Barlow; Don Jensen; Mark Reichelderfer; Brooks D Cash
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 41.316

6.  Colorectal neoplasms: prospective comparison of thin-section low-dose multi-detector row CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy for detection.

Authors:  Michael Macari; Edmund J Bini; Xiaonan Xue; Andrew Milano; Seth S Katz; Daniel Resnick; Hersh Chandarana; Glen Krinsky; Klaus Klingenbeck; Christopher H Marshall; Alec J Megibow
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Prevalence of clinically important histology in small adenomas.

Authors:  Lynn F Butterly; Michael P Chase; Heiko Pohl; Gale S Fiarman
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 11.382

Review 8.  Cost-effectiveness of CT colonography.

Authors:  Cesare Hassan; Perry J Pickhardt
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 2.303

9.  Perforation during colonoscopy in endoscopic ambulatory surgical centers.

Authors:  Louis Y Korman; Bergein F Overholt; Terry Box; Cynthia Kelsey Winker
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 9.427

10.  Burden of waiting for surveillance CT colonography in patients with screen-detected 6-9 mm polyps.

Authors:  Charlotte J Tutein Nolthenius; Thierry N Boellaard; Margriet C de Haan; C Yung Nio; Maarten G J Thomeer; Shandra Bipat; Alexander D Montauban van Swijndregt; Marie-Louise Essink-Bot; Ernst J Kuipers; Evelien Dekker; Jaap Stoker
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 5.315

View more
  3 in total

1.  Colorectal adenoma and cancer detection based on altered methylation pattern of SFRP1, SFRP2, SDC2, and PRIMA1 in plasma samples.

Authors:  Barbara Kinga Barták; Alexandra Kalmár; Bálint Péterfia; Árpád V Patai; Orsolya Galamb; Gábor Valcz; Sándor Spisák; Barnabás Wichmann; Zsófia Brigitta Nagy; Kinga Tóth; Zsolt Tulassay; Péter Igaz; Béla Molnár
Journal:  Epigenetics       Date:  2017-09-26       Impact factor: 4.528

Review 2.  CT Colonography and Colorectal Carcinoma: Current Trends and Emerging Developments.

Authors:  Monika Kadari; Muhammad Subhan; Nisha Saji Parel; Parimi Vamsi Krishna; Anuradha Gupta; Kamsika Uthayaseelan; Kivonika Uthayaseelan; Naga Anjani Bhaskar Srinivas Sunkara
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-05-11

Review 3.  Current Tissue Molecular Markers in Colorectal Cancer: A Literature Review.

Authors:  Gaia Peluso; Paola Incollingo; Armando Calogero; Vincenzo Tammaro; Niccolò Rupealta; Gaetano Chiacchio; Maria Laura Sandoval Sotelo; Gianluca Minieri; Antonio Pisani; Eleonora Riccio; Massimo Sabbatini; Umberto Marcello Bracale; Concetta Anna Dodaro; Nicola Carlomagno
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-10-29       Impact factor: 3.411

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.