Literature DB >> 16982816

Screening for colorectal neoplasia with CT colonography: initial experience from the 1st year of coverage by third-party payers.

Perry J Pickhardt1, Andrew J Taylor, David H Kim, Mark Reichelderfer, Deepak V Gopal, Patrick R Pfau.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate our experience in the 1st year of computed tomographic (CT) colonography screening since the initiation of local third-party payer coverage.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This HIPAA-compliant study was approved by the institutional review board, and informed consent was waived. Over a 1-year period that ended on April 27, 2005, 1110 consecutive adults (585 women, 525 men; mean age, 58.1 years) underwent primary CT colonography screening. More than 99% were covered by managed care agreements. CT colonographic interpretation was performed with primary three-dimensional polyp detection, and the final results were issued within 2 hours. Patients with large (> or =10-mm) polyps were referred for same-day optical colonoscopy, and patients with medium-sized (6-9-mm) lesions had the option of immediate optical colonoscopy or short-term CT colonography surveillance.
RESULTS: Large colorectal polyps were identified at CT colonography in 43 (3.9%) of 1110 patients. Medium-sized lesions were identified in 77 (6.9%) patients, 31 (40%) of whom chose optical colonoscopy and 46 (60%) of whom chose CT colonography surveillance. Concordant lesions were identified in 65 of 71 patients who underwent subsequent optical colonoscopy (positive predictive value, 91.5%). Sixty-one (86%) of 71 optical colonoscopic procedures were performed on the same day as CT colonography, thereby avoiding the need for repeat bowel preparation. The actual endoscopic referral rate for positive findings at CT colonography was 6.4% (71 of 1110 patients). The demand for CT colonography screening from primary care physicians and their patients increased throughout the study period.
CONCLUSION: As a primary colorectal screening tool, CT colonography covered by third-party payers has an acceptably low endoscopic referral rate and a high concordance of positive findings at optical colonoscopy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16982816     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2412052007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  21 in total

Review 1.  Polyp size measurement at CT colonography: what do we know and what do we need to know?

Authors:  Ronald M Summers
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  CT Colonography Reporting and Data System (C-RADS): benchmark values from a clinical screening program.

Authors:  B Dustin Pooler; David H Kim; Vu P Lam; Elizabeth S Burnside; Perry J Pickhardt
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Five year colorectal cancer outcomes in a large negative CT colonography screening cohort.

Authors:  David H Kim; B Dustin Pooler; Jennifer M Weiss; Perry J Pickhardt
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-12-31       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  CT colonography without cathartic preparation: positive predictive value and patient experience in clinical practice.

Authors:  Carmen Zueco Zueco; Carolina Sobrido Sampedro; Juan D Corroto; Paula Rodriguez Fernández; Manuela Fontanillo Fontanillo
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-01-14       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Insurance Coverage for CT Colonography Screening: Impact on Overall Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates.

Authors:  Maureen A Smith; Jennifer M Weiss; Aaron Potvien; Jessica R Schumacher; Ronald E Gangnon; David H Kim; Lauren A Weeth-Feinstein; Perry J Pickhardt
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 6.  CT colonography for population screening: ready for prime time?

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  Colorectal neoplasm: magnetic resonance colonography with fat enema-initial clinical experience.

Authors:  Shuai Zhang; Jun-Wei Peng; Qiang-Ying Shi; Feng Tang; Min-Guo Zhong
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-10-28       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Optical colonoscopy and virtual colonoscopy numbers after initiation of a CT colonography program: long term data.

Authors:  Mark Benson; Jeff Pier; Sally Kraft; David Kim; Perry Pickhardt; Jennifer Weiss; Deepak Gopal; Mark Reichelderfer; Patrick Pfau
Journal:  J Gastrointestin Liver Dis       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.008

9.  Computed tomography colonography (virtual colonoscopy): climax of a new era of validation and transition into community practice.

Authors:  Jacob Thomas; Jeffrey Carenza; Elizabeth McFarland
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2008-08

10.  Predictors of colorectal cancer screening variation among primary-care providers and clinics.

Authors:  Jennifer M Weiss; Maureen A Smith; Perry J Pickhardt; Sally A Kraft; Grace E Flood; David H Kim; Elizabeth Strutz; Patrick R Pfau
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 10.864

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.