Steffen Schmitz-Valckenberg1, Srinivas Sadda, Giovanni Staurenghi, Emily Y Chew, Monika Fleckenstein, Frank G Holz. 1. *Department of Ophthalmology, GRADE Reading Center, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany; †Deparment of Ophthalmology, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California; ‡Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences "Luigi Sacco," Eye Clinic, Luigi Sacco Hospital, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; and §Division of Epidemiology and Clinical Applications, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Abstract
PURPOSE: There is a lack of agreement regarding the types of lesions and clinical conditions that should be included in the term "geographic atrophy." Varied and conflicting views prevail throughout the literature and are currently used by retinal experts and other health care professionals. METHODS: We reviewed the nominal definition of the term "geographic atrophy" and conducted a search of the ophthalmologic literature focusing on preceding terminologies and the first citations of the term "geographic atrophy" secondary to age-related macular degeneration. RESULTS: According to the nominal definition, the term "geography" stands for a detailed description of the surface features of a specific region, indicating its relative position. However, it does not necessarily imply that the borders of the region must be sharply demarcated or related to any anatomical structures. The term "geographical areas of atrophy" was initially cited in the 1960s in the ophthalmologic literature in the context of uveitic eye disease and shortly thereafter also for the description of variants of "senile macular degeneration." However, no direct explanation could be found in the literature as to why the terms "geographical" and "geographic" were chosen. Presumably the terms were used as the atrophic regions resembled the map of a continent or well-defined country borders on thematic geographical maps. With the evolution of the terminology, the commonly used adjunct "of the retinal pigment epithelium" was frequently omitted and solely the term "geographic atrophy" prevailed for the nonexudative late-stage of age-related macular degeneration itself. Along with the quantification of atrophic areas, based on different imaging modalities and the use of both manual and semiautomated approaches, various and inconsistent definitions for the minimal lesion diameter or size of atrophic lesions have also emerged. CONCLUSION: Reconsideration of the application of the term "geographic atrophy" in the context of age-related macular degeneration seems to be prudent given ongoing advances in multimodal retinal imaging technology with identification of various phenotypic characteristics, and the observation of atrophy development in eyes under antiangiogenic therapy.
PURPOSE: There is a lack of agreement regarding the types of lesions and clinical conditions that should be included in the term "geographic atrophy." Varied and conflicting views prevail throughout the literature and are currently used by retinal experts and other health care professionals. METHODS: We reviewed the nominal definition of the term "geographic atrophy" and conducted a search of the ophthalmologic literature focusing on preceding terminologies and the first citations of the term "geographic atrophy" secondary to age-related macular degeneration. RESULTS: According to the nominal definition, the term "geography" stands for a detailed description of the surface features of a specific region, indicating its relative position. However, it does not necessarily imply that the borders of the region must be sharply demarcated or related to any anatomical structures. The term "geographical areas of atrophy" was initially cited in the 1960s in the ophthalmologic literature in the context of uveitic eye disease and shortly thereafter also for the description of variants of "senile macular degeneration." However, no direct explanation could be found in the literature as to why the terms "geographical" and "geographic" were chosen. Presumably the terms were used as the atrophic regions resembled the map of a continent or well-defined country borders on thematic geographical maps. With the evolution of the terminology, the commonly used adjunct "of the retinal pigment epithelium" was frequently omitted and solely the term "geographic atrophy" prevailed for the nonexudative late-stage of age-related macular degeneration itself. Along with the quantification of atrophic areas, based on different imaging modalities and the use of both manual and semiautomated approaches, various and inconsistent definitions for the minimal lesion diameter or size of atrophic lesions have also emerged. CONCLUSION: Reconsideration of the application of the term "geographic atrophy" in the context of age-related macular degeneration seems to be prudent given ongoing advances in multimodal retinal imaging technology with identification of various phenotypic characteristics, and the observation of atrophy development in eyes under antiangiogenic therapy.
Authors: Viola Duisdieker; Monika Fleckenstein; Katharina M Zilkens; Julia S Steinberg; Frank G Holz; Steffen Schmitz-Valckenberg Journal: Ophthalmologica Date: 2015-09-23 Impact factor: 3.250
Authors: Robert B Bhisitkul; Thais S Mendes; Soraya Rofagha; Wayne Enanoria; David S Boyer; SriniVas R Sadda; Kang Zhang Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2015-01-30 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Nicole T M Saksens; Monika Fleckenstein; Steffen Schmitz-Valckenberg; Frank G Holz; Anneke I den Hollander; Jan E E Keunen; Camiel J F Boon; Carel B Hoyng Journal: Prog Retin Eye Res Date: 2013-11-28 Impact factor: 21.198
Authors: Anne S Lindblad; Patricia C Lloyd; Traci E Clemons; Gary R Gensler; Frederick L Ferris; Michael L Klein; Jane R Armstrong Journal: Arch Ophthalmol Date: 2009-09
Authors: Robyn H Guymer; Philip J Rosenfeld; Christine A Curcio; Frank G Holz; Giovanni Staurenghi; K Bailey Freund; Steffen Schmitz-Valckenberg; Janet Sparrow; Richard F Spaide; Adnan Tufail; Usha Chakravarthy; Glenn J Jaffe; Karl Csaky; David Sarraf; Jordi M Monés; Ramin Tadayoni; Juan Grunwald; Ferdinando Bottoni; Sandra Liakopoulos; Daniel Pauleikhoff; Sergio Pagliarini; Emily Y Chew; Francesco Viola; Monika Fleckenstein; Barbara A Blodi; Tock Han Lim; Victor Chong; Jerry Lutty; Alan C Bird; Srinivas R Sadda Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2019-09-30 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Tiarnan D Keenan; Elvira Agrón; Amitha Domalpally; Traci E Clemons; Freekje van Asten; Wai T Wong; Ronald G Danis; SriniVas Sadda; Philip J Rosenfeld; Michael L Klein; Rinki Ratnapriya; Anand Swaroop; Frederick L Ferris; Emily Y Chew Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2018-07-27 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Diane L Wang; Julia Agee; Marco Mazzola; Riccardo Sacconi; Giuseppe Querques; Alan D Weinberg; R Theodore Smith Journal: Ophthalmol Retina Date: 2019-08-07
Authors: Cynthia A Toth; Vincent Tai; Maxwell Pistilli; Stephanie J Chiu; Katrina P Winter; Ebenezer Daniel; Juan E Grunwald; Glenn J Jaffe; Daniel F Martin; Gui-Shuang Ying; Sina Farsiu; Maureen G Maguire Journal: Ophthalmol Retina Date: 2018-12-03
Authors: Avni P Finn; Maxwell Pistilli; Vincent Tai; Ebenezer Daniel; Gui-Shuang Ying; Maureen G Maguire; Juan E Grunwald; Daniel F Martin; Glenn J Jaffe; Cynthia A Toth Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2020-11-19 Impact factor: 5.258