Literature DB >> 27551013

Use and Yield of Baseline Imaging and Laboratory Testing in Stage II Breast Cancer.

Brittany L Bychkovsky1,2, Hao Guo3, Jazmine Sutton2,4, Laura Spring3,2, Jennifer Faig2,4, Ibiayi Dagogo-Jack3,2, Chiara Battelli5, Mary Jane Houlihan2,4, Tsai-Chu Yeh3,2,6, Steven E Come2,4, Nancy U Lin3,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite guideline recommendations, baseline laboratory testing and advanced imaging are widely ordered in clinical practice to stage asymptomatic patients with clinical stage II breast cancer (BC).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study at two academic centers in Boston, Massachusetts, between 2006 and 2007 explored the use, results, and implications of laboratory tests, tumor markers, and imaging in patients with clinical stage II BC.
RESULTS: Among 411 patients, 233 (57%) had liver function testing, 134 (33%) had tumor marker tests, and 237 (58%) had computed tomography (CT) as part of their initial diagnostic workup. Median age was 52 (range, 23-90 years). On multivariable analysis, young age, more advanced stage, and tumor subtype (human epidermal growth receptor-positive [HER2+] and triple-negative breast cancer [TNBC]) were significantly associated with baseline CT. The rate of detection of true metastatic disease with use of baseline staging imaging was 2.1% (95% confidence interval, 0.7%-5%). It was 2.2% (3 of 135) for estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor-positive disease, 1.9% (1 of 54) for HER2+ disease, and 2.1% (1 of 48) for TNBC. At 5 years of follow-up, 46 of 406 patients were diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer. Thirty-four of 46 (73.9%) who developed recurrent disease had imaging at their initial diagnosis, and of these, five had abnormalities on their initial imaging that was correlated with where they developed metastatic disease.
CONCLUSION: In this cohort of women with stage II BC, staging imaging at diagnosis had a low yield in detecting distant metastases (2.1%). The detection rate was not higher with HER2+ disease or TNBC, despite the trend that patients with these subtypes were more likely to undergo imaging. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Despite guideline recommendations, asymptomatic patients with stage II breast cancer (BC) often undergo staging imaging with computed tomography, bone scanning, or positron emission tomography. Physicians have often reported that they order imaging despite recommendations because they believe that younger patients or patients with more aggressive BC phenotypes, such as human epidermal receptor 2-positive BC or triple-negative BC, benefit from staging imaging. In this cohort of women younger than those in prior studies, the yield of detecting distant metastatic disease in patients with clinical stage II BC was very low and the detection rate was not higher in the presence of HER2-positive or triple-negative BC. ©AlphaMed Press.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast Cancer; Imaging utilization; Metastases; Radiologic studies; Staging; Tumor markers

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27551013      PMCID: PMC5153340          DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2016-0157

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncologist        ISSN: 1083-7159


  10 in total

Review 1.  Evaluation of the evidence on staging imaging for detection of asymptomatic distant metastases in newly diagnosed breast cancer.

Authors:  M E Brennan; N Houssami
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 4.380

2.  Staging studies have limited utility for newly diagnosed stage I-II breast cancer.

Authors:  Andrew Linkugel; Julie Margenthaler; Barbara Dull; Amy Cyr
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 2.192

3.  Complete blood counts, liver function tests, and chest x-rays as routine screening in early-stage breast cancer: value added or just cost?

Authors:  Raphael J Louie; Jennifer E Tonneson; Minda Gowarty; Philip P Goodney; Richard J Barth; Kari M Rosenkranz
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  Imaging for distant metastases in women with early-stage breast cancer: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Demetrios Simos; Christina Catley; Carl van Walraven; Angel Arnaout; Christopher M Booth; Matthew McInnes; Dean Fergusson; Susan Dent; Mark Clemons
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2015-06-22       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Baseline staging tests after a new diagnosis of breast cancer: further evidence of their limited indications.

Authors:  F Puglisi; A Follador; A M Minisini; G G Cardellino; S Russo; C Andreetta; S Di Terlizzi; A Piga
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 32.976

6.  Advanced imaging modalities in early stage breast cancer: preoperative use in the United States Medicare population.

Authors:  Margaret L Crivello; Karen Ruth; Elin R Sigurdson; Brian L Egleston; Kathryn Evers; Yu-Ning Wong; Marcia Boraas; Richard J Bleicher
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-08-10       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Radiologic tests after a new diagnosis of breast cancer.

Authors:  R O Dillman; S Chico
Journal:  Eff Clin Pract       Date:  2000 Jan-Feb

8.  The value of preoperative staging chest computed tomography to detect asymptomatic lung and liver metastasis in patients with primary breast carcinoma.

Authors:  Hyeyoung Kim; Wonshik Han; Hyeong-Gon Moon; Junwon Min; Soo-Kyung Ahn; Tae-You Kim; Seock-Ah Im; Do-Youn Oh; Sae-Won Han; Eui Kyu Chie; Sung Whan Ha; Dong-Young Noh
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2011-02-05       Impact factor: 4.872

9.  Bone scan and liver ultrasound scan in the preoperative staging for primary breast cancer.

Authors:  Abdul R Kasem; Anil Desai; Simon Daniell; Prakash Sinha
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2006 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.431

10.  Patient perceptions and expectations regarding imaging for metastatic disease in early stage breast cancer.

Authors:  Demetrios Simos; Brian Hutton; Ian D Graham; Angel Arnaout; Jean-Michel Caudrelier; Sasha Mazzarello; Mark Clemons
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2014-04-05
  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  Baseline staging imaging for distant metastasis in women with stages I, II, and III breast cancer.

Authors:  A Arnaout; N P Varela; M Allarakhia; L Grimard; A Hey; J Lau; L Thain; A Eisen
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 3.677

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.