Literature DB >> 26467045

Complete blood counts, liver function tests, and chest x-rays as routine screening in early-stage breast cancer: value added or just cost?

Raphael J Louie, Jennifer E Tonneson, Minda Gowarty, Philip P Goodney, Richard J Barth, Kari M Rosenkranz.   

Abstract

Current National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines for breast cancer staging include pre-treatment complete blood count (CBC) and liver function tests (LFT) to screen for occult metastatic disease. To date, the relevance of these tests in detecting metastatic disease in asymptomatic women with early-stage breast cancer (Stage I/II) has not been demonstrated. Although chest x-rays are no longer recommended in the NCCN guidelines, many centers continue to include this imaging as part of their screening process. We aim to determine the clinical and financial impact of these labs and x-rays in the evaluation of early-stage breast cancer patients. A single institution IRB-approved retrospective chart review was conducted of patients with biopsy-proven invasive breast cancer treated from January 1, 2005–December 31, 2009. We collected patient demographics, clinical and pathologic staging, chest x-ray, CBC, and LFT results at the time of referral. Patients were stratified according to radiographic stage at the time of diagnosis. We obtained Medicare reimbursement fees for cost analysis. From 2005 to 2009, 1609 patients with biopsy-proven invasive breast cancer were treated at our institution. Of the 1082 patients with radiographic stage I/II disease, 27.3 % of patients had abnormal CBCs. No additional testing was performed to evaluate these abnormalities. In the early-stage population, 24.7 % of patients had elevated LFTs, resulting in 84 additional imaging studies. No metastatic disease was detected. The cost of CBC, LFTs and chest x-rays was $110.20 per patient, totaling $106,410.99. Additional tests prompted by abnormal results cost $58,143.30 over the five-year period. We found that pre-treatment CBCs, LFTs, and chest x-rays did not improve detection of occult metastatic disease but resulted in additional financial costs. Avoiding routine ordering of these tests would save the US healthcare system $25.7 million annually.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26467045     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-015-3593-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  4 in total

1.  Use and Yield of Baseline Imaging and Laboratory Testing in Stage II Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Brittany L Bychkovsky; Hao Guo; Jazmine Sutton; Laura Spring; Jennifer Faig; Ibiayi Dagogo-Jack; Chiara Battelli; Mary Jane Houlihan; Tsai-Chu Yeh; Steven E Come; Nancy U Lin
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2016-08-22

2.  SEOM clinical guidelines in early stage breast cancer (2018).

Authors:  F Ayala de la Peña; R Andrés; J A Garcia-Sáenz; L Manso; M Margelí; E Dalmau; S Pernas; A Prat; S Servitja; E Ciruelos
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 3.405

3.  Clinicopathologic Features Predictive of Distant Metastasis in Patients Diagnosed With Invasive Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Basim Ali; Fatima Mubarik; Nida Zahid; Abida K Sattar
Journal:  JCO Glob Oncol       Date:  2020-08

Review 4.  Characterizing and quantifying low-value diagnostic imaging internationally: a scoping review.

Authors:  Elin Kjelle; Eivind Richter Andersen; Arne Magnus Krokeide; Lesley J J Soril; Leti van Bodegom-Vos; Fiona M Clement; Bjørn Morten Hofmann
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 2.795

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.