Literature DB >> 27546625

Robust best linear estimator for Cox regression with instrumental variables in whole cohort and surrogates with additive measurement error in calibration sample.

Ching-Yun Wang1, Xiao Song2.   

Abstract

Biomedical researchers are often interested in estimating the effect of an environmental exposure in relation to a chronic disease endpoint. However, the exposure variable of interest may be measured with errors. In a subset of the whole cohort, a surrogate variable is available for the true unobserved exposure variable. The surrogate variable satisfies an additive measurement error model, but it may not have repeated measurements. The subset in which the surrogate variables are available is called a calibration sample. In addition to the surrogate variables that are available among the subjects in the calibration sample, we consider the situation when there is an instrumental variable available for all study subjects. An instrumental variable is correlated with the unobserved true exposure variable, and hence can be useful in the estimation of the regression coefficients. In this paper, we propose a nonparametric method for Cox regression using the observed data from the whole cohort. The nonparametric estimator is the best linear combination of a nonparametric correction estimator from the calibration sample and the difference of the naive estimators from the calibration sample and the whole cohort. The asymptotic distribution is derived, and the finite sample performance of the proposed estimator is examined via intensive simulation studies. The methods are applied to the Nutritional Biomarkers Study of the Women's Health Initiative.
© 2016 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Calibration sample; Instrumental variable; Measurement error; Survival analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27546625      PMCID: PMC5399789          DOI: 10.1002/bimj.201500238

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biom J        ISSN: 0323-3847            Impact factor:   2.207


  16 in total

1.  Structure of dietary measurement error: results of the OPEN biomarker study.

Authors:  Victor Kipnis; Amy F Subar; Douglas Midthune; Laurence S Freedman; Rachel Ballard-Barbash; Richard P Troiano; Sheila Bingham; Dale A Schoeller; Arthur Schatzkin; Raymond J Carroll
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2003-07-01       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  On corrected score approach for proportional hazards model with covariate measurement error.

Authors:  Xiao Song; Yijian Huang
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Joint inference for nonlinear mixed-effects models and time to event at the presence of missing data.

Authors:  Lang Wu; X Joan Hu; Hulin Wu
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2007-08-29       Impact factor: 5.899

4.  Joint inference on HIV viral dynamics and immune suppression in presence of measurement errors.

Authors:  L Wu; W Liu; X J Hu
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2009-08-10       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Estimating the parameters in the Cox model when covariate variables are measured with error.

Authors:  P Hu; A A Tsiatis; M Davidian
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Regression calibration in failure time regression.

Authors:  C Y Wang; L Hsu; Z D Feng; R L Prentice
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Empirical evidence of correlated biases in dietary assessment instruments and its implications.

Authors:  V Kipnis; D Midthune; L S Freedman; S Bingham; A Schatzkin; A Subar; R J Carroll
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2001-02-15       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 8.  Obesity and the risk for premenopausal and postmenopausal breast cancer.

Authors:  Garnet L Anderson; Marian L Neuhouser
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2012-03-05

9.  Long-term low-protein, low-calorie diet and endurance exercise modulate metabolic factors associated with cancer risk.

Authors:  Luigi Fontana; Samuel Klein; John O Holloszy
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 7.045

10.  Dietary underreporting by obese individuals--is it specific or non-specific?

Authors:  B L Heitmann; L Lissner
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-10-14
View more
  1 in total

1.  Evaluating biomarkers for treatment selection from reproducibility studies.

Authors:  Xiao Song; Kevin K Dobbin
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 5.899

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.