Literature DB >> 27546575

Plumage Genes and Little Else Distinguish the Genomes of Hybridizing Warblers.

David P L Toews1, Scott A Taylor2, Rachel Vallender3, Alan Brelsford4, Bronwyn G Butcher5, Philipp W Messer6, Irby J Lovette2.   

Abstract

When related taxa hybridize extensively, their genomes may become increasingly homogenized over time. This mixing via hybridization creates conservation challenges when it reduces genetic or phenotypic diversity and when it endangers previously distinct species via genetic swamping [1]. However, hybridization also facilitates admixture mapping of traits that distinguish each species and the associated genes that maintain distinctiveness despite ongoing gene flow [2]. We address these dual aspects of hybridization in the golden-winged/blue-winged warbler complex, two phenotypically divergent warblers that are indistinguishable using traditional molecular markers and that draw substantial conservation attention [3-5]. Whole-genome comparisons show that differentiation is extremely low: only six small genomic regions exhibit strong differences. Four of these divergence peaks occur in proximity to genes known to be involved in feather development or pigmentation: agouti signaling protein (ASIP), follistatin (FST), ecodysplasin (EDA), wingless-related integration site (Wnt), and beta-carotene oxygenase 2 (BCO2). Throat coloration-the most striking plumage difference between these warblers-is perfectly associated with the promoter region of agouti, and genotypes at this locus obey simple Mendelian recessive inheritance of the black-throated phenotype characteristic of golden-winged warblers. The more general pattern of genomic similarity between these warblers likely results from a protracted period of hybridization, contradicting the broadly accepted hypothesis that admixture results from solely anthropogenic habitat change in the past two centuries [4]. Considered in concert, these results are relevant to both the genetic architecture of avian feather pigmentation and the evolutionary history and conservation challenges associated with these declining songbirds.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27546575     DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2016.06.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  57 in total

1.  A wood-warbler produced through both interspecific and intergeneric hybridization.

Authors:  David P L Toews; Henry M Streby; Lowell Burket; Scott A Taylor
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Anthropogenic habitat alteration leads to rapid loss of adaptive variation and restoration potential in wild salmon populations.

Authors:  Tasha Q Thompson; M Renee Bellinger; Sean M O'Rourke; Daniel J Prince; Alexander E Stevenson; Antonia T Rodrigues; Matthew R Sloat; Camilla F Speller; Dongya Y Yang; Virginia L Butler; Michael A Banks; Michael R Miller
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Genomic islands of differentiation in a rapid avian radiation have been driven by recent selective sweeps.

Authors:  Hussein A Hejase; Ayelet Salman-Minkov; Leonardo Campagna; Melissa J Hubisz; Irby J Lovette; Ilan Gronau; Adam Siepel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  The importance of intrinsic postzygotic barriers throughout the speciation process.

Authors:  Jenn M Coughlan; Daniel R Matute
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Differences in Cell Proliferation and Craniofacial Phenotype of Closely Related Species in the Pupfish Genus Cyprinodon.

Authors:  Ezra Lencer; Amy R McCune
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 2.645

Review 6.  The genomics of coloration provides insights into adaptive evolution.

Authors:  Anna Orteu; Chris D Jiggins
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 53.242

7.  High-density lipoprotein receptor SCARB1 is required for carotenoid coloration in birds.

Authors:  Matthew B Toomey; Ricardo J Lopes; Pedro M Araújo; James D Johnson; Małgorzata A Gazda; Sandra Afonso; Paulo G Mota; Rebecca E Koch; Geoffrey E Hill; Joseph C Corbo; Miguel Carneiro
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  A non-coding region near Follistatin controls head colour polymorphism in the Gouldian finch.

Authors:  Matthew B Toomey; Cristiana I Marques; Pedro Andrade; Pedro M Araújo; Stephen Sabatino; Małgorzata A Gazda; Sandra Afonso; Ricardo J Lopes; Joseph C Corbo; Miguel Carneiro
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Admixture mapping in a hybrid zone reveals loci associated with avian feather coloration.

Authors:  Alan Brelsford; David P L Toews; Darren E Irwin
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  The human mitochondrial enzyme BCO2 exhibits catalytic activity toward carotenoids and apocarotenoids.

Authors:  Linda D Thomas; Sepalika Bandara; Vipulkumar M Parmar; Ramkumar Srinivasagan; Nimesh Khadka; Marcin Golczak; Philip D Kiser; Johannes von Lintig
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 5.157

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.