Maria A Bedoya1, Susan J Back1,2, Mary H Scanlon2,3, Jorge Delgado1, Kassa Darge1,2, Janet R Reid4,5. 1. Department of Radiology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 34th Street and Civic Center Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA. 2. Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. 3. Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. 4. Department of Radiology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 34th Street and Civic Center Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA. reidj@email.chop.edu. 5. Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. reidj@email.chop.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Increasing workloads threaten the quality of teaching in academic radiology practices. There is a wealth of unfiltered educational resources for radiology on the internet. As a digital native, today's radiology trainee may have differing opinions from teachers about learning and intellectual property. OBJECTIVE: To identify the preferences and philosophies regarding learning, technology and intellectual property toward the future development of an innovative radiology curriculum. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An electronic survey with 22 questions was sent to 2,010 members of the Society for Pediatric Radiology and 100 radiology trainees. RESULTS: Three hundred sixty-one of the 2,110 surveys were returned. All questions were completed in 342 surveys. Fifty-three respondents were trainees (residents and fellows) and 289 respondents were radiologists (teachers). Time needed for a single learning activity in both groups is <30 min, but teachers spend less time (P=0.007). The preferred learning environments were point-of-care and outside work hours for both groups. Ideal lecture durations were 31-45 min for trainees and 21-30 min for teachers (P=0.001). Adoption of new technology showed late majority and laggard trends for both groups (P=0.296). Interest in gadgets was greater in trainees (17%) than teachers (2%) (P<0.001). Interest in lecture recording was greater in trainees (84%) than teachers (61%) (P=0.008). More trainees (61%) than teachers (42%) would not charge money for educational materials (P=0.028); 27% versus 13%, respectively, disagreed with dissemination of those materials beyond the institution (P=0.013). CONCLUSION: While millennial trainees are adult learners with a stronger comfort with technology, learning styles of trainees and teachers are more similar than was previously believed. Trainees and teachers hold conflicting philosophies about intellectual property. Results herein speak favorably for revising our teaching portfolio to include practical learning materials of short duration available at point-of-care.
BACKGROUND: Increasing workloads threaten the quality of teaching in academic radiology practices. There is a wealth of unfiltered educational resources for radiology on the internet. As a digital native, today's radiology trainee may have differing opinions from teachers about learning and intellectual property. OBJECTIVE: To identify the preferences and philosophies regarding learning, technology and intellectual property toward the future development of an innovative radiology curriculum. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An electronic survey with 22 questions was sent to 2,010 members of the Society for Pediatric Radiology and 100 radiology trainees. RESULTS: Three hundred sixty-one of the 2,110 surveys were returned. All questions were completed in 342 surveys. Fifty-three respondents were trainees (residents and fellows) and 289 respondents were radiologists (teachers). Time needed for a single learning activity in both groups is <30 min, but teachers spend less time (P=0.007). The preferred learning environments were point-of-care and outside work hours for both groups. Ideal lecture durations were 31-45 min for trainees and 21-30 min for teachers (P=0.001). Adoption of new technology showed late majority and laggard trends for both groups (P=0.296). Interest in gadgets was greater in trainees (17%) than teachers (2%) (P<0.001). Interest in lecture recording was greater in trainees (84%) than teachers (61%) (P=0.008). More trainees (61%) than teachers (42%) would not charge money for educational materials (P=0.028); 27% versus 13%, respectively, disagreed with dissemination of those materials beyond the institution (P=0.013). CONCLUSION: While millennial trainees are adult learners with a stronger comfort with technology, learning styles of trainees and teachers are more similar than was previously believed. Trainees and teachers hold conflicting philosophies about intellectual property. Results herein speak favorably for revising our teaching portfolio to include practical learning materials of short duration available at point-of-care.
Authors: David A Jamadar; Ruth Carlos; Elaine M Caoili; Perry G Pernicano; Jon A Jacobson; Smita Patel; Mitra Noroozian; Qian Dong; Janet E Bailey; Stephanie K Patterson; Katherine A Klein; James D Good; Ella A Kazerooni; N Reed Dunnick Journal: Acad Radiol Date: 2005-01 Impact factor: 3.173
Authors: Supriya Gupta; Elizabeth M Johnson; Justin G Peacock; Liwei Jiang; Morgan P McBee; Michael B Sneider; Elizabeth A Krupinski Journal: J Digit Imaging Date: 2020-06 Impact factor: 4.056