RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The introduction of picture archiving and communication system (PACS) has decreased the time needed to interpret radiology examinations resulting in an increased workflow. Because of concerns that the increase in exam throughput and the use of voice recognition may have a negative impact upon radiology resident education, a survey was conducted to assess the impact of PACS and voice recognition. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Residents at four diagnostic radiology training programs were surveyed. Survey topics included resident demographics, didactic and technical issues, and areas for improvement. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-four residents were polled with 42 respondents (42/134, 31.3%). The majority have been using PACS for more than 1 year (29/41, 70.7%) to interpret 75-100% of cases (33/39, 84.6%). A majority believed PACS is a superior teaching tool to printed film (28/38, 73.7%). However, only a minority (9/40, 22.5%) indicated that PACS was always used to contain teaching files and to conduct departmental conferences (5/40, 12.5%). The majority of respondents believed PACS have decreased the time needed to interpret diagnostic examinations (33/41, 80.5%). A majority (80.6%, 25/31) indicated that voice recognition takes more time than the traditional dictation and transcription process, where 51.3% (20/39, 51.3%) felt that voice recognition works well less than 50% of the time. CONCLUSIONS: Residents believe that PACS has positively affected their learning experience but indicate that it can be better utilized for resident education. Residents believe that voice recognition is less reliable and more time consuming than the traditional dictation system.
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The introduction of picture archiving and communication system (PACS) has decreased the time needed to interpret radiology examinations resulting in an increased workflow. Because of concerns that the increase in exam throughput and the use of voice recognition may have a negative impact upon radiology resident education, a survey was conducted to assess the impact of PACS and voice recognition. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Residents at four diagnostic radiology training programs were surveyed. Survey topics included resident demographics, didactic and technical issues, and areas for improvement. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-four residents were polled with 42 respondents (42/134, 31.3%). The majority have been using PACS for more than 1 year (29/41, 70.7%) to interpret 75-100% of cases (33/39, 84.6%). A majority believed PACS is a superior teaching tool to printed film (28/38, 73.7%). However, only a minority (9/40, 22.5%) indicated that PACS was always used to contain teaching files and to conduct departmental conferences (5/40, 12.5%). The majority of respondents believed PACS have decreased the time needed to interpret diagnostic examinations (33/41, 80.5%). A majority (80.6%, 25/31) indicated that voice recognition takes more time than the traditional dictation and transcription process, where 51.3% (20/39, 51.3%) felt that voice recognition works well less than 50% of the time. CONCLUSIONS: Residents believe that PACS has positively affected their learning experience but indicate that it can be better utilized for resident education. Residents believe that voice recognition is less reliable and more time consuming than the traditional dictation system.