| Literature DB >> 27542284 |
Ilze Skujina1, Robert McMahon1, Vasileios Panagiotis Lenis1, Georgios V Gkoutos1,2,3, Matthew Hegarty1.
Abstract
Despite a number of biochemical and lifestyle differences which should increase risk of oxidative damage to their mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) and thus reduce expected lifespan, avian species often display longer lifespans than mammals of similar body mass. Recent work in mammalian ageing has demonstrated that functional mitochondrial copy number declines with age. We noted that several bird species display duplication of the control region (CR) of the mtDNA to form a pseudo-control region (YCR), apparently an avian-specific phenomenon. To investigate whether the presence of this duplication may play a similar role in longevity to mitochondrial copy number in mammals, we correlated body mass and longevity in 92 avian families and demonstrate a significant association. Furthermore, outlier analysis demonstrated a significant (p=0.01) difference associated with presence of the YCR duplication in longer-lived avian species. Further research is required to determine if the YCR does indeed alter mitochondrial function or resilience to oxidative damage, but these findings provide an intriguing hint of how mitochondrial sequences may be related to an extended lifespan.Entities:
Keywords: ageing; birds; comparative genomics; control region duplication; genetics; lifespan; mitochondrial genome
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27542284 PMCID: PMC5032695 DOI: 10.18632/aging.101012
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Aging (Albany NY) ISSN: 1945-4589 Impact factor: 5.682
Figure 1(a) The relationship between average family adult body weight (M) and family average maximum life span (AMLS) in Aves: Ln(AMLS) = 0.20Ln(M) + 1.72. (b) Quantile-Quantile plot for the linear regression model of the average body mass and longevity for 92 avian families. (c) Δresiduals modulus of AMLS and BM as a function of ΔGD (families): y = 1.11x + 0.18, R(**) = 0.009 See Supplement 4 for raw data.
Regression Statistics and Coefficients for lifespan/body mass correlation
| Table 1a: Regression Statistics 0 | |
|---|---|
| Multiple R | 0.79 |
| R Square | 0.63 |
| Adjusted R Square | 0.63 |
| Standard Error | 0.33 |
| Observations | 92 |
Comparison of YCR presence/absence in long-lived and short-lived avian families
| YCR+ | YCR− | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | 3 | 10 | |
| 2 | 12 | 14 | |
| 9 | 15 | 24 |
Presence/absence of YCR duplication in long and short-lived avian families selected from the extremes of the lifespan/body mass regression. X test for difference = 5.531 (Fisher's exact probability, two tailed test, p = 0.01).
Ranking of avian families relative to lifespan/body mass regression
| Family | Abs. Rank | Rel. Rank | Split group | Abs. Rank | Rel. Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ardeidae | 38 | 0.4368 | YCR+ | 57 | 0.5816 |
| YCR− | 4 | 0.0408 | |||
| Petroicidae | 85 | 0.9081 | YCR+ | 79 | 0.8061 |
| YCR− | 90 | 0.9184 | |||
| Psittaculidae | 84 | 0.8966 | YCR+ | 92 | 0.9388 |
| YCR− | 85 | 0.8674 | |||
| Psittacidae | 88 | 0.9425 | YCR+ | 93 | 0.9490 |
| YCR− | 88 | 0.9000 | |||
| Bucerotidae | 87 | 0.9310 | YCR+ | 96 | 0.9800 |
| YCR− | 94 | 0.9592 | |||
| Turdidae | 40 | 0.4348 | YCR+ | 86 | 0.8776 |
| YCR− | 39 | 0.3976 |
Table 3 shows family position according to its residual value relative to the regression line. Rank 1 corresponds to the shortest lived result according to the predict value (the lowest residual value) and 98 the longest. Relative rank is calculated dividing the absolute position by the total number of families.