Ramakrishna Samala1, Helen R Thorsheim1, Satyanarayana Goda1,2, Kunal Taskar1,3, Brunilde Gril4, Patricia S Steeg4, Quentin R Smith5. 1. Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, 1300 South Coulter Drive, Amarillo, Texas, 79106, USA. 2. Formurex, Inc., Stockton, California, 95215, USA. 3. Mechanistic Safety and Disposition, IVIVT, GlaxoSmithKline, Ware, Hertfordshire, SG12 0DP, UK. 4. Women's Malignancies Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, 20892, USA. 5. Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, 1300 South Coulter Drive, Amarillo, Texas, 79106, USA. quentin.smith@ttuhsc.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate vinorelbine drug exposure and activity in brain metastases of the human MDA-MB-231BR breast cancer model using integrated imaging and analysis. METHODS: Brain and systemic metastases were created by administration of cancer cells in female NuNu mice. After metastases developed, animals were administered vinorelbine at the maximal tolerated dose (12 mg/kg), and were evaluated thereafter for total and unbound drug pharmacokinetics, biomarker TUNEL staining, and barrier permeability to Texas red. RESULTS: Median brain metastasis drug exposure was 4-fold greater than normal brain, yet only ~8% of non-barrier systemic metastases, which suggests restricted brain exposure. Unbound vinorelbine tissue/plasma partition coefficient, Kp,uu, equaled ~1.0 in systemic metastases, but 0.03-0.22 in brain metastases, documenting restricted equilibration. In select sub-regions of highest drug-uptake brain metastases, Kp,uu approached 1.0, indicating complete focal barrier breakdown. Most vinorelbine-treated brain metastases exhibited little or no positive early apoptosis TUNEL staining in vivo. The in vivo unbound vinorelbine IC50 for TUNEL-positive staining (56 nM) was 4-fold higher than that measured in vitro (14 nM). Consistent with this finding, P-glycoprotein expression was observed to be substantially upregulated in brain metastasis cells in vivo. CONCLUSIONS: Vinorelbine exposure at maximum tolerated dose was less than one-tenth that in systemic metastases in >70% of brain metastases, and was associated with negligible biomarker effect. In small subregions of the highest uptake brain metastases, compromise of blood-tumor barrier appeared complete. The results suggest that restricted delivery accounts for 80% of the compromise in drug efficacy for vinorelbine against this model.
PURPOSE: To evaluate vinorelbine drug exposure and activity in brain metastases of the humanMDA-MB-231BRbreast cancer model using integrated imaging and analysis. METHODS: Brain and systemic metastases were created by administration of cancer cells in female NuNu mice. After metastases developed, animals were administered vinorelbine at the maximal tolerated dose (12 mg/kg), and were evaluated thereafter for total and unbound drug pharmacokinetics, biomarker TUNEL staining, and barrier permeability to Texas red. RESULTS: Median brain metastasis drug exposure was 4-fold greater than normal brain, yet only ~8% of non-barrier systemic metastases, which suggests restricted brain exposure. Unbound vinorelbine tissue/plasma partition coefficient, Kp,uu, equaled ~1.0 in systemic metastases, but 0.03-0.22 in brain metastases, documenting restricted equilibration. In select sub-regions of highest drug-uptake brain metastases, Kp,uu approached 1.0, indicating complete focal barrier breakdown. Most vinorelbine-treated brain metastases exhibited little or no positive early apoptosis TUNEL staining in vivo. The in vivo unbound vinorelbine IC50 for TUNEL-positive staining (56 nM) was 4-fold higher than that measured in vitro (14 nM). Consistent with this finding, P-glycoprotein expression was observed to be substantially upregulated in brain metastasis cells in vivo. CONCLUSIONS:Vinorelbine exposure at maximum tolerated dose was less than one-tenth that in systemic metastases in >70% of brain metastases, and was associated with negligible biomarker effect. In small subregions of the highest uptake brain metastases, compromise of blood-tumor barrier appeared complete. The results suggest that restricted delivery accounts for 80% of the compromise in drug efficacy for vinorelbine against this model.
Entities:
Keywords:
blood–brain barrier; brain metastases; breast cancer; permeability; vinorelbine
Authors: Victor A Levin; Peter J Tonge; James M Gallo; Marc R Birtwistle; Arvin C Dar; Antonio Iavarone; Patrick J Paddison; Timothy P Heffron; William F Elmquist; Jean E Lachowicz; Ted W Johnson; Forest M White; Joohee Sul; Quentin R Smith; Wang Shen; Jann N Sarkaria; Ramakrishna Samala; Patrick Y Wen; Donald A Berry; Russell C Petter Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2015-11 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Michael Andersson; Elisabeth Lidbrink; Karsten Bjerre; Erik Wist; Kristin Enevoldsen; Anders B Jensen; Per Karlsson; Ulla B Tange; Peter G Sørensen; Susanne Møller; Jonas Bergh; Sven T Langkjer Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2010-12-13 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Jurjen S Lagas; Carola W N Damen; Robert A B van Waterschoot; Dilek Iusuf; Jos H Beijnen; Alfred H Schinkel Journal: Mol Pharmacol Date: 2012-07-05 Impact factor: 4.436
Authors: Fabio M Iwamoto; Antonio M Omuro; Jeffrey J Raizer; Craig P Nolan; Adília Hormigo; Andrew B Lassman; Igor T Gavrilovic; Lauren E Abrey Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2007-11-07 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Fancy C Thomas; Kunal Taskar; Vinay Rudraraju; Satyanarayana Goda; Helen R Thorsheim; Julie A Gaasch; Rajendar K Mittapalli; Diane Palmieri; Patricia S Steeg; Paul R Lockman; Quentin R Smith Journal: Pharm Res Date: 2009-09-23 Impact factor: 4.200
Authors: Brunilde Gril; Debbie Wei; Alexandra S Zimmer; Christina Robinson; Imran Khan; Simone Difilippantonio; Michael G Overstreet; Patricia S Steeg Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2020-11-26 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Deepak Kanojia; Wojciech K Panek; Alex Cordero; Jawad Fares; Annie Xiao; Solomiia Savchuk; Krishan Kumar; Ting Xiao; Katarzyna C Pituch; Jason Miska; Peng Zhang; Kwok-Ling Kam; Craig Horbinski; Irina V Balyasnikova; Atique U Ahmed; Maciej S Lesniak Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2020-08-26 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: Clarissa A Whitehead; Hong P T Nguyen; Andrew P Morokoff; Rodney B Luwor; Lucia Paradiso; Andrew H Kaye; Theo Mantamadiotis; Stanley S Stylli Journal: Transl Oncol Date: 2018-09-13 Impact factor: 4.243
Authors: Keyata N Thompson; Julia A Ju; Eleanor C Ory; Stephen J P Pratt; Rachel M Lee; Trevor J Mathias; Katarina T Chang; Cornell J Lee; Olga G Goloubeva; Patrick C Bailey; Kristi R Chakrabarti; Christopher M Jewell; Michele I Vitolo; Stuart S Martin Journal: Breast Cancer Res Date: 2022-02-14 Impact factor: 8.408
Authors: Manuel Valiente; Amanda E D Van Swearingen; Carey K Anders; Amos Bairoch; Adrienne Boire; Paula D Bos; Diana M Cittelly; Neta Erez; Gino B Ferraro; Dai Fukumura; Brunilde Gril; Meenhard Herlyn; Sheri L Holmen; Rakesh K Jain; Johanna A Joyce; Mihaela Lorger; Joan Massague; Josh Neman; Nicola R Sibson; Patricia S Steeg; Frits Thorsen; Leonie S Young; Damir Varešlija; Adina Vultur; Frances Weis-Garcia; Frank Winkler Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2020-07-08 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Brunilde Gril; Anurag N Paranjape; Stephan Woditschka; Emily Hua; Emma L Dolan; Jeffrey Hanson; Xiaolin Wu; Wojciech Kloc; Ewa Izycka-Swieszewska; Renata Duchnowska; Rafał Pęksa; Wojciech Biernat; Jacek Jassem; Naema Nayyar; Priscilla K Brastianos; O Morgan Hall; Cody J Peer; William D Figg; Gary T Pauly; Christina Robinson; Simone Difilippantonio; Emilie Bialecki; Philippe Metellus; Joel P Schneider; Patricia S Steeg Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2018-07-13 Impact factor: 14.919