PURPOSE: To investigate the efficacy and safety of the combination of vinorelbine and intensive temozolomide for recurrent or progressive brain metastases from solid tumors. METHODS: Patients > or =18 years of age and with Karnofsky performance scale (KPS) > or = 60, adequate organ function and progressive or recurrent brain metastases were eligible. This was a phase II trial with 28-day cycles using temozolomide (150 mg/m(2), days 1-7 and 15-21) and vinorelbine 25 or 30 mg/m(2 )on days one and eight. The primary endpoint was objective radiographic response. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients (15 men, 23 women) with a median age of 57 years (range, 39-75) and median KPS of 80 were enrolled. The primary tumor sites were lung (n = 20), breast (n = 11), colorectal (n = 2), kidney (n = 2), bladder (n = 1), endometrium (n = 1), head and neck (n = 1). Prior therapies included chemotherapy (97%), whole-brain radiation therapy (79%), brain metastasis resection (53%) and stereotatic radiosurgery (47%). Objective radiographic response rate was 5% (one complete response and one minor response); five patients had stable disease, 29 progressive disease and two patients were not evaluable. Twenty-nine patients (76%) have died and the median follow-up of survivors was six months. Median progression-free and overall survivals were 1.9 and 5 months, respectively. Grade 3/4 toxicities were mainly hematological and two patients discontinued the study due to myelosuppression. CONCLUSIONS: In this heavily pretreated population of patients with brain metastases, adding vinorelbine and increasing the intensity of temozolomide do not improve response rates compared to previous studies with single-agent temozolomide at standard doses.
PURPOSE: To investigate the efficacy and safety of the combination of vinorelbine and intensive temozolomide for recurrent or progressive brain metastases from solid tumors. METHODS:Patients > or =18 years of age and with Karnofsky performance scale (KPS) > or = 60, adequate organ function and progressive or recurrent brain metastases were eligible. This was a phase II trial with 28-day cycles using temozolomide (150 mg/m(2), days 1-7 and 15-21) and vinorelbine 25 or 30 mg/m(2 )on days one and eight. The primary endpoint was objective radiographic response. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients (15 men, 23 women) with a median age of 57 years (range, 39-75) and median KPS of 80 were enrolled. The primary tumor sites were lung (n = 20), breast (n = 11), colorectal (n = 2), kidney (n = 2), bladder (n = 1), endometrium (n = 1), head and neck (n = 1). Prior therapies included chemotherapy (97%), whole-brain radiation therapy (79%), brain metastasis resection (53%) and stereotatic radiosurgery (47%). Objective radiographic response rate was 5% (one complete response and one minor response); five patients had stable disease, 29 progressive disease and two patients were not evaluable. Twenty-nine patients (76%) have died and the median follow-up of survivors was six months. Median progression-free and overall survivals were 1.9 and 5 months, respectively. Grade 3/4 toxicities were mainly hematological and two patients discontinued the study due to myelosuppression. CONCLUSIONS: In this heavily pretreated population of patients with brain metastases, adding vinorelbine and increasing the intensity of temozolomide do not improve response rates compared to previous studies with single-agent temozolomide at standard doses.
Authors: C Christodoulou; D Bafaloukos; P Kosmidis; E Samantas; A Bamias; P Papakostas; A Karabelis; C Bacoyiannis; D V Skarlos Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2001-02 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: W K Yung; M D Prados; R Yaya-Tur; S S Rosenfeld; M Brada; H S Friedman; R Albright; J Olson; S M Chang; A M O'Neill; A H Friedman; J Bruner; N Yue; M Dugan; S Zaknoen; V A Levin Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1999-09 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Giovanni Bernardo; Quinto Cuzzoni; Maria Rosa Strada; Antonio Bernardo; Giuseppe Brunetti; Ivona Jedrychowska; Umberto Pozzi; Raffaella Palumbo Journal: Cancer Invest Date: 2002 Impact factor: 2.176
Authors: David W Andrews; Charles B Scott; Paul W Sperduto; Adam E Flanders; Laurie E Gaspar; Michael C Schell; Maria Werner-Wasik; William Demas; Janice Ryu; Jean-Paul Bahary; Luis Souhami; Marvin Rotman; Minesh P Mehta; Walter J Curran Journal: Lancet Date: 2004-05-22 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Sanjiv S Agarwala; John M Kirkwood; Martin Gore; Brigitte Dreno; Nicholas Thatcher; Beate Czarnetski; Michael Atkins; Antonio Buzaid; Dimosthenis Skarlos; Elaine M Rankin Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2004-06-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: A W Tolcher; S L Gerson; L Denis; C Geyer; L A Hammond; A Patnaik; A D Goetz; G Schwartz; T Edwards; L Reyderman; P Statkevich; D L Cutler; E K Rowinsky Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2003-04-07 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Taofeek K Owonikoko; Jack Arbiser; Amelia Zelnak; Hui-Kuo G Shu; Hyunsuk Shim; Adam M Robin; Steven N Kalkanis; Timothy G Whitsett; Bodour Salhia; Nhan L Tran; Timothy Ryken; Michael K Moore; Kathleen M Egan; Jeffrey J Olson Journal: Nat Rev Clin Oncol Date: 2014-02-25 Impact factor: 66.675
Authors: Marco Ronald Hassler; Wolfgang Pfeifer; Thomas Hendrik Knocke-Abulesz; Klaus Geissler; Gabriele Altorjai; Karin Dieckmann; Christine Marosi Journal: Wien Klin Wochenschr Date: 2013-08-02 Impact factor: 1.704
Authors: Lakshmi Nayak; Lisa M DeAngelis; H Ian Robins; Ramaswamy Govindan; Shirish Gadgeel; Karen Kelly; James R Rigas; David M Peereboom; Steven S Rosenfeld; Alona Muzikansky; Ming Zheng; Patrick Urban; Lauren E Abrey; Antonio Omuro; Patrick Y Wen Journal: Cancer Date: 2015-08-26 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Ramakrishna Samala; Helen R Thorsheim; Satyanarayana Goda; Kunal Taskar; Brunilde Gril; Patricia S Steeg; Quentin R Smith Journal: Pharm Res Date: 2016-08-19 Impact factor: 4.200
Authors: Mario Ammirati; Charles S Cobbs; Mark E Linskey; Nina A Paleologos; Timothy C Ryken; Stuart H Burri; Anthony L Asher; Jay S Loeffler; Paula D Robinson; David W Andrews; Laurie E Gaspar; Douglas Kondziolka; Michael McDermott; Minesh P Mehta; Tom Mikkelsen; Jeffrey J Olson; Roy A Patchell; Steven N Kalkanis Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2009-12-03 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Jeffrey J Olson; Nina A Paleologos; Laurie E Gaspar; Paula D Robinson; Rachel E Morris; Mario Ammirati; David W Andrews; Anthony L Asher; Stuart H Burri; Charles S Cobbs; Douglas Kondziolka; Mark E Linskey; Jay S Loeffler; Michael McDermott; Minesh P Mehta; Tom Mikkelsen; Roy A Patchell; Timothy C Ryken; Steven N Kalkanis Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2009-12-03 Impact factor: 4.130