Literature DB >> 2754002

Indirect immunoglobulin G (IgG) and IgM enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) and IgM capture ELISA for detection of antibodies to lipopolysaccharide in adult typhoid fever patients in Pakistan.

J Sippel1, N Bukhtiari, M B Awan, R Krieg, J F Duncan, K A Karamat, I A Malik, L M Igbal, L Legters.   

Abstract

Sera from 339 adult febrile patients in Pakistan were tested for antibodies to Salmonella typhi lipopolysaccharide by indirect immunoglobulin G (IgG) and IgM enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and IgM capture ELISA. A total of 55 patients had S. typhi cultured from their blood, 20 had S. typhi cultured from their stool, 24 were blood or stool culture positive for S. paratyphi A, 41 were culture negative but clinically diagnosed as having enteric fever, 41 had gastrointestinal or urinary tract infections, 41 were clinically diagnosed as having malaria, 20 were smear-positive patients with malaria, 58 had respiratory infections, and the remaining 39 individuals were placed in a miscellaneous group who did not have Salmonella infection. The sensitivities of the indirect IgG ELISA, indirect IgM ELISA, and IgM capture ELISA determined with specimens obtained from the blood culture-positive patients with typhoid fever (positive controls) were 80, 64, and 62%, respectively. The specificities of the assays determined with sera from the patients with respiratory infections (negative controls) were 95, 95, and 97%, respectively. The percentage of smear-positive patients with malaria who were positive by these assays was lower than that in the negative control group. The percentages of individuals in the other patient categories who were positive by these tests were between those obtained with the positive and negative controls. Of the positive controls, 26 were positive by both IgM assays, 9 were IgM positive only by indirect ELISA, and 8 were IgM positive only by IgM capture ELISA. A total of 70% of the positive control patients who were tested for O agglutinins by the Widal tube agglutination assay were positive; however, 29% of the negative control patients were also positive. The indirect IgG ELISA was the single most effective test for the serodiagnosis of typhoid fever in this population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2754002      PMCID: PMC267545          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.27.6.1298-1302.1989

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  13 in total

1.  Bone marrow aspirate culture superior to streptokinase clot culture and 8 ml 1:10 blood-to-broth ratio blood culture for diagnosis of typhoid fever.

Authors:  S L Hoffman; D C Edman; N H Punjabi; M Lesmana; A Cholid; S Sundah; J Harahap
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 2.345

2.  Specificity and sensitivity of the IgM capture immunoassay: studies of possible factors inducing false positive or false negative results.

Authors:  M J Briantais; L Grangeot-Keros; J Pillot
Journal:  J Virol Methods       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 2.014

3.  Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for mumps IgM antibody: comparison of IgM capture and indirect IgM assay.

Authors:  H Sakata; M Tsurudome; M Hishiyama; Y Ito; A Sugiura
Journal:  J Virol Methods       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 2.014

4.  Serodiagnosis of typhoid fever by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay determination of anti-Salmonella typhi lipopolysaccharide antibodies.

Authors:  S Nardiello; T Pizzella; M Russo; B Galanti
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Antibody response to the lipopolysaccharide and protein antigens of Salmonella typhi during typhoid infection. I. Measurement of serum antibodies by radioimmunoassay.

Authors:  R S Tsang; P Y Chau; S K Lam; J T La Brooy; D Rowley
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 4.330

6.  Improved serodiagnosis of Salmonella enteric fevers by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

Authors:  W J Beasley; S W Joseph; E Weiss
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Serodiagnosis of typhoid fever in paediatric patients by anti-LPS ELISA.

Authors:  J E Sippel; H M Hanafy; A S Diab; C Prato; R Arroyo
Journal:  Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.184

8.  Diagnostic value of the Widal test in areas endemic for typhoid fever.

Authors:  M M Levine; O Grados; R H Gilman; W E Woodward; R Solis-Plaza; W Waldman
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  1978-07       Impact factor: 2.345

9.  Rapid diagnosis of acute mumps infection by a direct immunoglobulin M antibody capture enzyme immunoassay with labeled antigen.

Authors:  J P Gut; C Spiess; S Schmitt; A Kirn
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Systemic and intestinal immunities after natural typhoid infection.

Authors:  S Sarasombath; N Banchuin; T Sukosol; B Rungpitarangsi; S Manasatit
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 5.948

View more
  9 in total

1.  Serology of typhoid fever in an area of endemicity and its relevance to diagnosis.

Authors:  D House; J Wain; V A Ho; T S Diep; N T Chinh; P V Bay; H Vinh; M Duc; C M Parry; G Dougan; N J White; T T Hien; J J Farrar
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Use of paired serum samples for serodiagnosis of typhoid fever.

Authors:  Deborah House; Nguyen T Chinh; To S Diep; Christopher M Parry; John Wain; Gordon Dougan; Nicholas J White; Tran Tinh Hien; Jeremy J Farrar
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 3.  Diagnostics for invasive Salmonella infections: Current challenges and future directions.

Authors:  Jason R Andrews; Edward T Ryan
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 3.641

Review 4.  Epidemiology, Clinical Presentation, Laboratory Diagnosis, Antimicrobial Resistance, and Antimicrobial Management of Invasive Salmonella Infections.

Authors:  John A Crump; Maria Sjölund-Karlsson; Melita A Gordon; Christopher M Parry
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 26.132

5.  Diagnosis of typhoid fever: detection of Salmonella typhi porins-specific antibodies by inhibition ELISA.

Authors:  K S Nandakumar; V Palanivel; V Muthukkaruppan
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 4.330

6.  Early diagnosis of typhoid fever by an enzyme immunoassay using Salmonella typhi outer membrane protein preparations.

Authors:  A Verdugo-Rodríguez; Y López-Vidal; J L Puente; G M Ruíz-Placios; E Calva
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 3.267

7.  One-step 2-minute test to detect typhoid-specific antibodies based on particle separation in tubes.

Authors:  P L Lim; F C Tam; Y M Cheong; M Jegathesan
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 8.  Laboratory Diagnosis of Paratyphoid Fever: Opportunity of Surface Plasmon Resonance.

Authors:  Dina M Alhaj-Qasem; Mohammad A I Al-Hatamleh; Ahmad Adebayo Irekeola; Muhammad Fazli Khalid; Rohimah Mohamud; Aziah Ismail; Fatin Hamimi Mustafa
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-28

9.  A Meta-Analysis of Typhoid Diagnostic Accuracy Studies: A Recommendation to Adopt a Standardized Composite Reference.

Authors:  Helen L Storey; Ying Huang; Chris Crudder; Allison Golden; Tala de los Santos; Kenneth Hawkins
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-13       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.