Literature DB >> 11230418

Serology of typhoid fever in an area of endemicity and its relevance to diagnosis.

D House1, J Wain, V A Ho, T S Diep, N T Chinh, P V Bay, H Vinh, M Duc, C M Parry, G Dougan, N J White, T T Hien, J J Farrar.   

Abstract

Currently, the laboratory diagnosis of typhoid fever is dependent upon either the isolation of Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serotype Typhi from a clinical sample or the detection of raised titers of agglutinating serum antibodies against the lipopolysaccharide (LPS) (O) or flagellum (H) antigens of serotype Typhi (the Widal test). In this study, the serum antibody responses to the LPS and flagellum antigens of serotype Typhi were investigated with individuals from a region of Vietnam in which typhoid is endemic, and their usefulness for the diagnosis of typhoid fever was evaluated. The antibody responses to both antigens were highly variable among individuals infected with serotype Typhi, and elevated antibody titers were also detected in a high proportion of serum samples from healthy subjects from the community. In-house enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) for the detection of specific classes of anti-LPS and antiflagellum antibodies were compared with other serologically based tests for the diagnosis of typhoid fever (Widal TO and TH, anti-serotype Typhi immunoglobulin M [IgM] dipstick, and IDeaL TUBEX). At a specificity of > or =0.93, the sensitivities of the different tests were 0.75, 0.55, and 0.52 for the anti-LPS IgM, IgG, and IgA ELISAs, respectively; 0.28 for the antiflagellum IgG ELISA; 0.47 and 0.32 for the Widal TO and TH tests, respectively; and 0.77 for the anti-serotype Typhi IgM dipstick assay. The specificity of the IDeaL TUBEX was below 0.90 (sensitivity, 0.87; specificity, 0.76). The serological assays based on the detection of IgM antibodies against either serotype Typhi LPS (ELISA) or whole bacteria (dipstick) had a significantly higher sensitivity than the Widal TO test when used with a single acute-phase serum sample (P < or = 0.007). These tests could be of use for the diagnosis of typhoid fever in patients who have clinical typhoid fever but are culture negative or in regions where bacterial culturing facilities are not available.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11230418      PMCID: PMC87864          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.39.3.1002-1007.2001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  33 in total

1.  Two or three days of ofloxacin treatment for uncomplicated multidrug-resistant typhoid fever in children.

Authors:  H Vinh; J Wain; T N Vo; N N Cao; T C Mai; D Bethell; T T Nguyen; S D Tu; M D Nguyen; N J White
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Rapid serologic diagnosis of pediatric typhoid fever in an endemic area: a prospective comparative evaluation of two dot-enzyme immunoassays and the Widal test.

Authors:  Z A Bhutta; N Mansurali
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.345

3.  Interpretation of serologic tests for typhoid fever.

Authors:  S A Schroeder
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1968-10-21       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Typhoid fever and other salmonellosis: a continuing challenge.

Authors:  T Pang; Z A Bhutta; B B Finlay; M Altwegg
Journal:  Trends Microbiol       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 17.079

5.  Improved techniques for the preparation of bacterial lipopolysaccharides.

Authors:  K G Johnson; M B Perry
Journal:  Can J Microbiol       Date:  1976-01       Impact factor: 2.419

6.  A critical assessment of the conventional Widal test in the diagnosis of tyhoid and parathyphoid fevers.

Authors:  R Sen; S N Saxena
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  1969-10       Impact factor: 2.375

7.  Risk factors for typhoid fever in the Mekong delta, southern Viet Nam: a case-control study.

Authors:  C Luxemburger; M C Chau; N L Mai; J Wain; T H Tran; J A Simpson; H K Le; T T Nguyen; N J White; J J Farrar
Journal:  Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.184

8.  Evaluation of the response of human humoral antibodies to Salmonella typhi lipopolysaccharide in an area of endemic typhoid fever.

Authors:  H I Shaheen; N I Girgis; G R Rodier; K A Kamal
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 9.079

9.  Retrospective study to determine the diagnostic value of the Widal test in a non-endemic country.

Authors:  J G Koeleman; D F Regensburg; F van Katwijk; D M MacLaren
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 3.267

10.  Characterization of defined ompR mutants of Salmonella typhi: ompR is involved in the regulation of Vi polysaccharide expression.

Authors:  D Pickard; J Li; M Roberts; D Maskell; D Hone; M Levine; G Dougan; S Chatfield
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 3.441

View more
  37 in total

1.  Use of paired serum samples for serodiagnosis of typhoid fever.

Authors:  Deborah House; Nguyen T Chinh; To S Diep; Christopher M Parry; John Wain; Gordon Dougan; Nicholas J White; Tran Tinh Hien; Jeremy J Farrar
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Optimizing typhoid fever case definitions by combining serological tests in a large population study in Hechi City, China.

Authors:  B Dong; C M Galindo; E Shin; C J Acosta; A L Page; M Wang; D Kim; R L Ochiai; J Park; M Ali; L V Seidlein; Z Xu; J Yang; J D Clemens
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2007-01-12       Impact factor: 2.451

3.  Achieving accurate laboratory diagnosis of typhoid fever: a review and meta-analysis of TUBEX® TF clinical performance.

Authors:  Reynaldo Bundalian; Madonna Valenzuela; Raphael Enrique Tiongco
Journal:  Pathog Glob Health       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Comparison of serological test kits for diagnosis of typhoid fever in the Philippines.

Authors:  Razel L Kawano; Susan A Leano; Dorothy May A Agdamag
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-10-25       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi O:1,9,12 polysaccharide-protein conjugate as a diagnostic tool for typhoid fever.

Authors:  Jessica Zuñiga; Luis Lillo; Junghee J Shin; Rajya L Machavarapu; Teresa Quiroga; Manuela Goycoolea; Betty Matsuhiro; L Aron-Hott; Henry P Godfrey; Felipe C Cabello
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 6.  Persistent Infection and Long-Term Carriage of Typhoidal and Nontyphoidal Salmonellae.

Authors:  Ohad Gal-Mor
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 26.132

7.  Evaluation of dipstick serologic tests for diagnosis of brucellosis and typhoid Fever in egypt.

Authors:  Tharwat F Ismail; Henk Smits; Momtaz O Wasfy; Joseph L Malone; Moustafa A Fadeel; Frank Mahoney
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 8.  Current trends in typhoid Fever.

Authors:  Nancy F Crum
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2003-08

Review 9.  Searching for the elusive typhoid diagnostic.

Authors:  Stephen Baker; Michael Favorov; Gordon Dougan
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2010-03-05       Impact factor: 3.090

10.  Evaluation of rapid diagnostic tests for typhoid fever.

Authors:  Sonja J Olsen; Jim Pruckler; William Bibb; Thi My Thanh Nguyen; My Trinh Tran; Thi Minh Nguyen; Sumathi Sivapalasingam; Amita Gupta; Thu Phuong Phan; Tran Chinh Nguyen; Vinh Chau Nguyen; Dac Cam Phung; Eric D Mintz
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.