Literature DB >> 27539200

A mixed methods study of clinical information availability in obstetric triage and prenatal offices.

Chad D Meyerhoefer1, Susan A Sherer2, Mary E Deily1, Shin-Yi Chou1, Lizhong Peng3, Tianyan Hu4, Marion Nihen5, Michael Sheinberg5, Donald Levick6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of availability of clinical information from an integrated electronic health record system on pregnancy outcomes at the point of care.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used provider interviews and surveys to evaluate the availability of pregnancy-related clinical information in ambulatory practices and the hospital, and applied multiple regression to determine whether greater clinical information availability is associated with improvements in pregnancy outcomes and changes in care processes. Our regression models are risk adjusted and include physician fixed effects to control for unobservable characteristics of physicians that are constant across patients and time.
RESULTS: Making nonstress test results, blood pressure data, antenatal problem lists, and tubal sterilization requests from office records available to hospital-based providers is significantly associated with reductions in the likelihood of obstetric trauma and other adverse pregnancy outcomes. Better access to prenatal records also increases the probability of labor induction and decreases the probability of Cesarean section (C-section). Availability of lab test results and new diagnoses generated in the hospital at ambulatory offices is associated with fewer preterm births and low-birth-weight babies. DISCUSSION AND
CONCLUSIONS: Increased availability of specific clinical information enables providers to deliver better care and improve outcomes, but some types of clinical data are more important than others. More available information does not always result from automated integration of electronic records, but rather from the availability of the source records. Providers depend upon information that they trust to be reliable, complete, consistent, and easily retrievable, even if this requires multiple interfaces.
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Medical Informatics Association. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com

Entities:  

Keywords:  electronic health records; information transmission; mixed methods; pregnancy outcome

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27539200      PMCID: PMC7651939          DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocw113

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc        ISSN: 1067-5027            Impact factor:   4.497


  13 in total

1.  Standard obstetric record charting system: evaluation of a new electronic medical record.

Authors:  P E Nielsen; B A Thomson; R B Jackson; K Kosman; K C Kiley
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 2.  Using technology to promote perinatal patient safety.

Authors:  Patricia Robin McCartney
Journal:  J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs       Date:  2006 May-Jun

3.  Reducing errors and risk in a prenatal network with an electronic medical record.

Authors:  Peter S Bernstein; Irwin R Merkatz
Journal:  J Reprod Med       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 0.142

4.  Examining the value of electronic health records on labor and delivery.

Authors:  Karen B Eden; Rosalia Messina; Hong Li; Patricia Osterweil; Carrie R Henderson; Jeanne-Marie Guise
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Organizational fragmentation and care quality in the U.S healthcare system.

Authors:  Randall D Cebul; James B Rebitzer; Lowell J Taylor; Mark E Votruba
Journal:  J Econ Perspect       Date:  2008

6.  Integrating commercial ambulatory electronic health records with hospital systems: An evolutionary process.

Authors:  Susan A Sherer; Chad D Meyerhoefer; Michael Sheinberg; Donald Levick
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2015-05-22       Impact factor: 4.046

Review 7.  Deficits in communication and information transfer between hospital-based and primary care physicians: implications for patient safety and continuity of care.

Authors:  Sunil Kripalani; Frank LeFevre; Christopher O Phillips; Mark V Williams; Preetha Basaviah; David W Baker
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2007-02-28       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  The role of health information technology in care coordination in the United States.

Authors:  Chun-Ju Hsiao; Jennifer King; Esther Hing; Alan E Simon
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 9.  The outcomes of regional healthcare information systems in health care: a review of the research literature.

Authors:  Tiina Mäenpää; Tarja Suominen; Paula Asikainen; Marianne Maass; Ilmari Rostila
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2009-08-04       Impact factor: 4.046

10.  Microsystems in health care: Part 6. Designing patient safety into the microsystem.

Authors:  Julie J Mohr; Paul Barach; Joseph P Cravero; George T Blike; Marjorie M Godfrey; Paul B Batalden; Eugene C Nelson
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Saf       Date:  2003-08
View more
  2 in total

1.  Provider and patient satisfaction with the integration of ambulatory and hospital EHR systems.

Authors:  Chad D Meyerhoefer; Susan A Sherer; Mary E Deily; Shin-Yi Chou; Xiaohui Guo; Jie Chen; Michael Sheinberg; Donald Levick
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Development of A Machine Learning Algorithm to Classify Drugs Of Unknown Fetal Effect.

Authors:  Mary Regina Boland; Fernanda Polubriaginof; Nicholas P Tatonetti
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-10-09       Impact factor: 4.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.