Susan A Sherer1, Chad D Meyerhoefer2, Michael Sheinberg3, Donald Levick3. 1. Lehigh University Department of Management, Bethlehem, PA 18015, United States. Electronic address: sas6@lehigh.edu. 2. Lehigh University Department of Economics, Bethlehem, PA 18015, United States. 3. Lehigh Valley Health Network, Allentown, PA 18105, United States.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The increase in electronic health record implementation in all treatment venues has led to greater demands for integration within and across practice settings with different work cultures. We study the evolution of coordination processes when integrating ambulatory-specific electronic health records with hospital systems. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Longitudinal qualitative study using semi-structured interviews and archival documentation throughout a 5-year implementation and integration of obstetrical ambulatory and hospital records with a goal of achieving a perinatal continuum of care. RESULTS: As users implement and integrate electronic health records, there is an evolution in their focus from technology acceptance to structural adaptation to coordination. The users' perspective on standardization evolves from initial concern about the unintended consequences of standardization to recognition of its importance and then finally to more active acceptance. The system itself cannot drive all reengineering; the organization must impose specific work process changes and as the user's perspective evolves, more individually adapted and aligned change will occur. Computer integration alone does not result in coordination; users must value integrated information and incorporate this information within their workflows. DISCUSSION: Users initially view electronic health records as a documentation tool, but over time they come to recognize the benefits of the system for clinical information retrieval, and finally, for care coordination after the integrated information provided through electronic health records becomes more complete, accessible and adapted to meet user needs. As this occurs, coordination mechanisms move beyond pooled standardization through sequential plans coordinated by the organization to reciprocal mutual adjustments for clinical decision making by individuals. Trust in the information source, not software interoperability, is critical for information sharing. CONCLUSIONS: Organizations implementing commercial electronic health records cannot simply assume that reciprocal coordination will immediately occur. It takes time for users to adjust, and enculturate coordination goals, during which time there are adaptive structurations that require organizational response, and changes in mechanisms for achieving coordination.
OBJECTIVE: The increase in electronic health record implementation in all treatment venues has led to greater demands for integration within and across practice settings with different work cultures. We study the evolution of coordination processes when integrating ambulatory-specific electronic health records with hospital systems. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Longitudinal qualitative study using semi-structured interviews and archival documentation throughout a 5-year implementation and integration of obstetrical ambulatory and hospital records with a goal of achieving a perinatal continuum of care. RESULTS: As users implement and integrate electronic health records, there is an evolution in their focus from technology acceptance to structural adaptation to coordination. The users' perspective on standardization evolves from initial concern about the unintended consequences of standardization to recognition of its importance and then finally to more active acceptance. The system itself cannot drive all reengineering; the organization must impose specific work process changes and as the user's perspective evolves, more individually adapted and aligned change will occur. Computer integration alone does not result in coordination; users must value integrated information and incorporate this information within their workflows. DISCUSSION: Users initially view electronic health records as a documentation tool, but over time they come to recognize the benefits of the system for clinical information retrieval, and finally, for care coordination after the integrated information provided through electronic health records becomes more complete, accessible and adapted to meet user needs. As this occurs, coordination mechanisms move beyond pooled standardization through sequential plans coordinated by the organization to reciprocal mutual adjustments for clinical decision making by individuals. Trust in the information source, not software interoperability, is critical for information sharing. CONCLUSIONS: Organizations implementing commercial electronic health records cannot simply assume that reciprocal coordination will immediately occur. It takes time for users to adjust, and enculturate coordination goals, during which time there are adaptive structurations that require organizational response, and changes in mechanisms for achieving coordination.
Authors: Chad D Meyerhoefer; Susan A Sherer; Mary E Deily; Shin-Yi Chou; Xiaohui Guo; Jie Chen; Michael Sheinberg; Donald Levick Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2018-08-01 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: E Borycki; J W Dexheimer; C Hullin Lucay Cossio; Y Gong; S Jensen; J Kaipio; S Kennebeck; E Kirkendall; A W Kushniruk; C Kuziemsky; R Marcilly; R Röhrig; K Saranto; Y Senathirajah; J Weber; H Takeda Journal: Yearb Med Inform Date: 2016-11-10
Authors: Chad D Meyerhoefer; Susan A Sherer; Mary E Deily; Shin-Yi Chou; Lizhong Peng; Tianyan Hu; Marion Nihen; Michael Sheinberg; Donald Levick Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2017-04-01 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Nathan P Dean; Jenhao J Cheng; Ian Crumbley; Jennifer DuVal; Eliana Maldonado; Emanuel Ghebremariam Journal: Pediatr Qual Saf Date: 2020-03-25