Literature DB >> 11084193

Standard obstetric record charting system: evaluation of a new electronic medical record.

P E Nielsen1, B A Thomson, R B Jackson, K Kosman, K C Kiley.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To develop, implement, and evaluate an electronic record that tracks antepartum, intrapartum, and postpartum care.
METHODS: The Standard Obstetric Record Charting system (STORC) was created by a group of programmers and clinicians who developed screen designs, reports, pick lists, and standard notes, and ensured a flexible, yet standard system. To evaluate data within the system, ORYX (Joint Commission) performance measures were collected retrospectively and compared with STORC data.
RESULTS: The STORC, officially implemented as our complete inpatient and outpatient obstetric record in March 1998, provided seamless integration of antepartum, intrapartum, and postpartum care records, standard forms, and standard and ad hoc reports. Data for customizable case and procedure lists are generated easily. Unplanned and total cesarean deliveries were identified retrospectively in 0% (0 of 18) of charts reviewed for ORYX; however, STORC identified the actual rates of each as 8.3% (23 of 276) and 12.3% (34 of 276), respectively. Other critical ORYX measures not identified by retrospective data collection, but accurately provided by STORC, included rates of third and fourth degree lacerations, postpartum hemorrhage, low and extremely low birth weights, and macrosomia.
CONCLUSION: After implementation in a large referral center, completeness and accuracy of charting and rapid access to obstetric outcome data were improved. Provider acceptance of the system also was dramatic and improved over time as a result of direct development oversight by obstetric health care providers, local control of system changes, and immediate access to outcome data. (Obstet Gynecol 2000;96:1003-8.)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11084193     DOI: 10.1016/s0029-7844(00)01073-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  4 in total

Review 1.  Determinants of success of inpatient clinical information systems: a literature review.

Authors:  M J Van Der Meijden; H J Tange; J Troost; A Hasman
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2003-01-28       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Missing prenatal records at a birth center: a communication problem quantified.

Authors:  Donald W Miller; John D Yeast; Robin L Evans
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2005

3.  A qualitative study of gestational weight gain counseling and tracking.

Authors:  Emily Oken; Karen Switkowski; Sarah Price; Lauren Guthrie; Elsie M Taveras; Matthew Gillman; Jonathan Friedes; William Callaghan; Patricia Dietz
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2013-10

4.  A mixed methods study of clinical information availability in obstetric triage and prenatal offices.

Authors:  Chad D Meyerhoefer; Susan A Sherer; Mary E Deily; Shin-Yi Chou; Lizhong Peng; Tianyan Hu; Marion Nihen; Michael Sheinberg; Donald Levick
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 4.497

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.