| Literature DB >> 27538849 |
Hesameddin Ilatikhameneh1, Tarek Ameen1, Bozidar Novakovic1, Yaohua Tan1, Gerhard Klimeck1, Rajib Rahman1.
Abstract
Scaling transistors' dimensions has been the thrust for the semiconductor industry in the last four decades. However, scaling channel lengths beyond 10 nm has become exceptionally challenging due to the direct tunneling between source and drain which degrades gate control, switching functionality, and worsens power dissipation. Fortunately, the emergence of novel classes of materials with exotic properties in recent times has opened up new avenues in device design. Here, we show that by using channel materials with an anisotropic effective mass, the channel can be scaled down to 1 nm and still provide an excellent switching performance in phosphorene nanoribbon MOSFETs. To solve power consumption challenge besides dimension scaling in conventional transistors, a novel tunnel transistor is proposed which takes advantage of anisotropic mass in both ON- and OFF-state of the operation. Full-band atomistic quantum transport simulations of phosphorene nanoribbon MOSFETs and TFETs based on the new design have been performed as a proof.Entities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27538849 PMCID: PMC4990915 DOI: 10.1038/srep31501
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1The band diagram of (a) 12 nm long GaAs, (b) 5 nm long GaAs, and (c) 5 nm long phosphorene MOSFETs. The colormap shows the transparency of the channel. The potential barrier in the 5 nm long GaAs MOSFET is transparent and hence, the gate efficiency is low. This problem can be solved by using phosphorene with high m*.
Figure 2(a) The device structure of the bilayer phosphorene TFET with L-shaped gate. (b) The main tunneling paths in the ON-state (blue arrows) and OFF-state (red arrows) of the phosphorene TFET.
The electron and hole effective mass values of phosphorene along armchair and zigzag directions calculated from our tight-binding method (TB) and DFT calculations from literature (HSE0626 and PBE27).
| Ref. | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1L | 0.17 | 1.09 | 0.15 | 5.84 | TB |
| 0.17 | 1.12 | 0.15 | 6.35 | HSE06 | |
| 0.14 | 1.23 | 0.13 | 13.09 | PBE | |
| 2L | 0.17 | 1.13 | 0.14 | 2.8 | TB |
| 0.18 | 1.13 | 0.15 | 1.81 | HSE06 | |
| 0.11 | 1.35 | 0.1 | 2.18 | PBE |
Figure 3(a) The comparison between I-V of conventional 2L-phosphorene nanoribbons along zigzag and armchair directions with that of the L-gate TFET. (b) ON-current and SS of L-gate TFET as a function of dL. (c) Impact of channel length scaling on I-V of L-gate TFETs. (d) ION/IOFF ratio of the L-gate TFET as a function of L. (e) The top view of edge-less L-gate design.
Figure 4(a) Device structure of zigzag monolayer phosphorene MOSFET. (b) The comparison between I-V of phosphorene nanoribbon MOSFETs with transport direction along high m* (zigzag: blue) and low m* (armchair: red) axes. (c) Impact of L scaling on I-V of phosphorene MOSFETs. (d) ION/IOFF ratio of MOSFETs as a function of L along zigzag and armchair transport directions.