Sannamari Kotaluoto1, Mika Ukkonen1, Satu-Liisa Pauniaho2, Mika Helminen3, Juhani Sand1, Tuomo Rantanen4. 1. Department of Gastroenterology and Alimentary Tract Surgery, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland. 2. Emergency Division of Pirkanmaa Hospital District, Tampere University Hospital and University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland. 3. Science Center, Pirkanmaa Hospital District, Tampere and School of Health Sciences, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland. 4. Department of Surgery, Kuopio University Hospital, Box 100, 70029 KYS, Kuopio, Finland. tuomora@gmail.com.
Abstract
OBJECT: To define the mortality rate of appendectomy patients and appendectomy-related risk factors. BACKGROUND: Appendectomy has been considered as a safe operation and negative appendectomies acceptable in order to avoid perforations. There are few publications on appendectomy-related mortality. Removal of a normal appendix has been suggested to be related to a higher mortality rate versus removal of an inflamed appendix. METHODS: Data on all appendectomy patients between 1990 and 2010 in Finland were retrieved from the Discharge Register of the National Institute for Health and Welfare and combined with data from the Death Certificate Register of Statistics Finland. Thirty-day mortality was identified and compared with overall mortality. Detailed information from death certificates of patients dying within 30-day post-surgery was collected and analyzed. RESULTS: Over the study period, the thirty-day post-appendectomy mortality rate was 2.1/1000. Increased mortality was found in patients over 60 years of age. Negative appendectomy and complicated appendicitis were related to mortality. The negative appendectomy rate was higher in patients older than 40 years of age. During the study period, both mortality and the rate of negative appendectomies decreased, while the rate of laparoscopic appendectomies increased. CONCLUSIONS: Post-appendectomy mortality is related to both negative appendectomies and complicated appendicitis. Diagnostic accuracy is fundamental in the care of patients with acute appendicitis, especially in the elderly. Improved diagnostic accuracy may have reduced mortality over the last two decades in Finland.
OBJECT: To define the mortality rate of appendectomy patients and appendectomy-related risk factors. BACKGROUND: Appendectomy has been considered as a safe operation and negative appendectomies acceptable in order to avoid perforations. There are few publications on appendectomy-related mortality. Removal of a normal appendix has been suggested to be related to a higher mortality rate versus removal of an inflamed appendix. METHODS: Data on all appendectomy patients between 1990 and 2010 in Finland were retrieved from the Discharge Register of the National Institute for Health and Welfare and combined with data from the Death Certificate Register of Statistics Finland. Thirty-day mortality was identified and compared with overall mortality. Detailed information from death certificates of patients dying within 30-day post-surgery was collected and analyzed. RESULTS: Over the study period, the thirty-day post-appendectomy mortality rate was 2.1/1000. Increased mortality was found in patients over 60 years of age. Negative appendectomy and complicated appendicitis were related to mortality. The negative appendectomy rate was higher in patients older than 40 years of age. During the study period, both mortality and the rate of negative appendectomies decreased, while the rate of laparoscopic appendectomies increased. CONCLUSIONS: Post-appendectomy mortality is related to both negative appendectomies and complicated appendicitis. Diagnostic accuracy is fundamental in the care of patients with acute appendicitis, especially in the elderly. Improved diagnostic accuracy may have reduced mortality over the last two decades in Finland.
Authors: Hossein Masoomi; Steven Mills; Matthew O Dolich; Noor Ketana; Joseph C Carmichael; Ninh T Nguyen; Michael J Stamos Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2011-07-02 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Sannamari Kotaluoto; Satu-Liisa K Pauniaho; Mika T Helminen; Juhani A Sand; Tuomo K Rantanen Journal: World J Surg Date: 2016-02 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: S R Markar; A Karthikesalingam; J Cunningham; C Burd; G Bond-Smith; T R Kurzawinski Journal: Ann R Coll Surg Engl Date: 2011-11 Impact factor: 1.891
Authors: Imre Ilves; Hannu E K Paajanen; Karl-Heinz Herzig; Anne Fagerström; Pekka J Miettinen Journal: World J Surg Date: 2011-04 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Paulina Salminen; Hannu Paajanen; Tero Rautio; Pia Nordström; Markku Aarnio; Tuomo Rantanen; Risto Tuominen; Saija Hurme; Johanna Virtanen; Jukka-Pekka Mecklin; Juhani Sand; Airi Jartti; Irina Rinta-Kiikka; Juha M Grönroos Journal: JAMA Date: 2015-06-16 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Rebecca L Bracken; John B Harringa; B Keegan Markhardt; Newrhee Kim; John K Park; Douglas R Kitchin; Jessica B Robbins; Timothy J Ziemlewicz; Jen Birstler; Michael J Ryan; Ly Hoang; Perry J Pickhardt; Scott B Reeder; Michael D Repplinger Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2021-07-16 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Thomas Jaschinski; Christoph G Mosch; Michaela Eikermann; Edmund Am Neugebauer; Stefan Sauerland Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2018-11-28
Authors: Lucas Faraco Sobrado; Lucas Ernani; Daniel Reis Waisberg; Luiz Augusto Carneiro-D'Albuquerque; Wellington Andraus Journal: Int J Surg Case Rep Date: 2020-06-16