Literature DB >> 23192168

Short and long-term mortality after appendectomy in Sweden 1987 to 2006. Influence of appendectomy diagnosis, sex, age, co-morbidity, surgical method, hospital volume, and time period. A national population-based cohort study.

Roland E Andersson1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Avoiding mortality is the ultimate goal when managing patients with suspected appendicitis. Previous studies have shown high mortality after negative appendectomy. This national cohort study analyzes short- and long-term mortality after appendectomy in relation to appendectomy diagnosis, age, co-morbidity, surgical method, hospital volume, and time period.
METHOD: A total of 223,543 appendectomy patients treated from 1987 to 2006 were identified from the Swedish National Patient Register and followed up via the Swedish Cause of Death Register. Analysis of mortality was conducted as Standardized Mortality Ratio (SMR) and by Cox multivariate regression.
RESULTS: Negative appendectomy was followed by a higher mortality in the short term (30-day Standardized Mortality Ratio (SMR30d) 8.95, confidence interval (CI) 6.68-12.61) than after perforated appendicitis (SMR30d 6.39, CI 5.44-7.48), and remained increased for up to 5 years (SMR5yr 1.31, CI 1.16-1.47). Non-perforated appendicitis had a lower than expected long-term mortality (SMR5yr 0.72, CI 0.68-0.76). These differences remained after adjustment for covariates. Laparoscopic appendectomy had similar short-term mortality as open appendectomy but lower than expected long-term morality (SMR5yr 0.70, CI 0.62-0.78). Mortality was decreasing during the study period. Hospital volume had no influence on mortality.
CONCLUSIONS: Negative appendectomy is associated with excess short- and long-term mortality that remains after adjustment for known confounders, suggesting an association with underlying undetected morbidity. This motivates an improved preoperative diagnosis to avoid the additional trauma from unnecessary surgical interventions, but further studies are needed to investigate the cause of the increased long-term mortality and if this can be prevented by an improved follow-up of patients with negative appendectomy. Laparoscopic and open appendectomy have similar short-term mortality. The lower long-term mortality after non-perforated appendicitis and laparoscopic appendectomy suggest selection of healthier patients for these interventions. This possibility should be taken into account when comparing mortality after open and laparoscopic appendectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23192168     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-012-1856-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  12 in total

1.  Mortality after appendectomy in Sweden, 1987-1996.

Authors:  P G Blomqvist; R E Andersson; F Granath; M P Lambe; A R Ekbom
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Balancing the normal appendectomy rate with the perforated appendicitis rate: implications for quality assurance.

Authors:  V Velanovich; R Satava
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 0.688

3.  Comparison of outcomes of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in adults: data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS), 2006-2008.

Authors:  Hossein Masoomi; Steven Mills; Matthew O Dolich; Noor Ketana; Joseph C Carmichael; Ninh T Nguyen; Michael J Stamos
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-07-02       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Comparison of outcomes of laparoscopic and open appendectomy in management of uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis.

Authors:  Manish M Tiwari; Jason F Reynoso; Albert W Tsang; Dmitry Oleynikov
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: outcomes comparison based on a large administrative database.

Authors:  Ulrich Guller; Sheleika Hervey; Harriett Purves; Lawrence H Muhlbaier; Eric D Peterson; Steve Eubanks; Ricardo Pietrobon
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Indications for operation in suspected appendicitis and incidence of perforation.

Authors:  R Andersson; A Hugander; A Thulin; P O Nyström; G Olaison
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-01-08

7.  The clinical and economic correlates of misdiagnosed appendicitis: nationwide analysis.

Authors:  David R Flum; Thomas Koepsell
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2002-07

8.  Diagnostic accuracy and perforation rate in appendicitis: association with age and sex of the patient and with appendicectomy rate.

Authors:  R E Andersson; A Hugander; A J Thulin
Journal:  Eur J Surg       Date:  1992-01

9.  Traditional and laparoscopic appendectomy in adults: outcomes in English NHS hospitals between 1996 and 2006.

Authors:  Omar Faiz; Jeremy Clark; Tim Brown; Alex Bottle; Anthony Antoniou; Paul Farrands; Ara Darzi; Paul Aylin
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  External review and validation of the Swedish national inpatient register.

Authors:  Jonas F Ludvigsson; Eva Andersson; Anders Ekbom; Maria Feychting; Jeong-Lim Kim; Christina Reuterwall; Mona Heurgren; Petra Otterblad Olausson
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2011-06-09       Impact factor: 3.295

View more
  17 in total

1.  New strategy during complicated open appendectomy: convert open operation to laparoscopy.

Authors:  Jin-Hui Zhu; Wei Li; Kai Yu; Jia Wu; Yun Ji; Jian-Wei Wang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Appendicitis in children from a gender perspective.

Authors:  Martin Salö; Bodil Ohlsson; Einar Arnbjörnsson; Pernilla Stenström
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2015-07-04       Impact factor: 1.827

3.  Mortality Related to Appendectomy; a Population Based Analysis over Two Decades in Finland.

Authors:  Sannamari Kotaluoto; Mika Ukkonen; Satu-Liisa Pauniaho; Mika Helminen; Juhani Sand; Tuomo Rantanen
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Effect of hospital volume on outcomes of laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis: an observational study.

Authors:  Atsuhiko Murata; Toshihiko Mayumi; Keiji Muramatsu; Makoto Ohtani; Shinya Matsuda
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-01-17       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  The Worldwide Epidemiology of Acute Appendicitis: An Analysis of the Global Health Data Exchange Dataset.

Authors:  Dakshitha P Wickramasinghe; Chrisjit Xavier; Dharmabandhu N Samarasekera
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Short- and long-term mortality after appendectomy in Sweden 1987-2006: influence of appendectomy diagnosis, sex, age, co-morbidity, surgical method, hospital volume, and time period--a national population based cohort study.

Authors:  Frederick Thurston Drake; David R Flum
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Delaying surgery to perform CT scans for suspected appendicitis decreases the rate of negative appendectomies without increasing the rate of perforation nor postoperative complications.

Authors:  M-O Sauvain; K Slankamenac; M K Muller; S Wildi; U Metzger; W Schmid; J Wydler; P-A Clavien; D Hahnloser
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 3.445

8.  Increased Risk of Clinically Significant Gallstones following an Appendectomy: A Five-Year Follow-Up Study.

Authors:  Shiu-Dong Chung; Chung-Chien Huang; Herng-Ching Lin; Ming-Chieh Tsai; Chao-Hung Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-27       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  WSES Jerusalem guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis.

Authors:  Salomone Di Saverio; Arianna Birindelli; Micheal D Kelly; Fausto Catena; Dieter G Weber; Massimo Sartelli; Michael Sugrue; Mark De Moya; Carlos Augusto Gomes; Aneel Bhangu; Ferdinando Agresta; Ernest E Moore; Kjetil Soreide; Ewen Griffiths; Steve De Castro; Jeffry Kashuk; Yoram Kluger; Ari Leppaniemi; Luca Ansaloni; Manne Andersson; Federico Coccolini; Raul Coimbra; Kurinchi S Gurusamy; Fabio Cesare Campanile; Walter Biffl; Osvaldo Chiara; Fred Moore; Andrew B Peitzman; Gustavo P Fraga; David Costa; Ronald V Maier; Sandro Rizoli; Zsolt J Balogh; Cino Bendinelli; Roberto Cirocchi; Valeria Tonini; Alice Piccinini; Gregorio Tugnoli; Elio Jovine; Roberto Persiani; Antonio Biondi; Thomas Scalea; Philip Stahel; Rao Ivatury; George Velmahos; Roland Andersson
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  Risk of Gastrointestinal Cancers among Patients with Appendectomy: A Large-Scale Swedish Register-Based Cohort Study during 1970-2009.

Authors:  Huan Song; Christian C Abnet; Åke Andrén-Sandberg; Anil K Chaturvedi; Weimin Ye
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.