Y R Patel1, M S Kirkman1, R V Considine1, T S Hannon1, K J Mather1. 1. Indiana University School of Medicine (Y.R.P., M.S.K., R.V.C., T.S.H., K.J.M.), Indianapolis, Indiana 46202; Harvard University (Y.R.P.), Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138; and University of North Carolina (M.S.K.), Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599.
Abstract
CONTEXT: Evidence-based strategies to prevent progression of dysglycemia in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes are needed. OBJECTIVE: To undertake a secondary analysis of the Early Diabetes Intervention Program (EDIP) in order to understand the features that were protective against worsening glycemia. DESIGN: EDIP was a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. SETTING:Two university diabetes centers. PATIENTS: A total of 219 overweight individuals with fasting glucose < 7.8 mmol/L and 2-hour oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) glucose > 11.1 mmol/L. INTERVENTIONS:Acarbose versus placebo, on a background of dietary recommendations, with quarterly visits to assess glycemia and intervention adherence for up to 5 years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Progression of fasting glucose ≥ 7.8 mmol/L on two consecutive quarterly visits. Cox proportional hazards modeling and ANOVA were performed to evaluate determinants of progression. RESULTS: Progression-free status was associated with reductions in weight, fasting glucose, 2-hour OGTT glucose, and increases in the high-density lipoprotein/triglyceride ratio. The reduction in fasting glucose was the only effect that remained significantly associated with progression-free status in multivariable Cox modeling. The reduction in fasting glucose was in turn primarily associated with reductions in weight and in 2-hour OGTT glucose. Acarbose treatment did not explain these changes. CONCLUSIONS: In early diabetes, reductions in glucose, driven by reductions in weight, can delay progressive metabolic worsening. These observations underscore the importance of lifestyle management including weight loss as a tool to mitigate worsening of glycemia in newly diagnosed diabetes.
RCT Entities:
CONTEXT: Evidence-based strategies to prevent progression of dysglycemia in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes are needed. OBJECTIVE: To undertake a secondary analysis of the Early Diabetes Intervention Program (EDIP) in order to understand the features that were protective against worsening glycemia. DESIGN:EDIP was a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. SETTING: Two university diabetes centers. PATIENTS: A total of 219 overweight individuals with fasting glucose < 7.8 mmol/L and 2-hour oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) glucose > 11.1 mmol/L. INTERVENTIONS:Acarbose versus placebo, on a background of dietary recommendations, with quarterly visits to assess glycemia and intervention adherence for up to 5 years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Progression of fasting glucose ≥ 7.8 mmol/L on two consecutive quarterly visits. Cox proportional hazards modeling and ANOVA were performed to evaluate determinants of progression. RESULTS: Progression-free status was associated with reductions in weight, fasting glucose, 2-hour OGTT glucose, and increases in the high-density lipoprotein/triglyceride ratio. The reduction in fasting glucose was the only effect that remained significantly associated with progression-free status in multivariable Cox modeling. The reduction in fasting glucose was in turn primarily associated with reductions in weight and in 2-hour OGTT glucose. Acarbose treatment did not explain these changes. CONCLUSIONS: In early diabetes, reductions in glucose, driven by reductions in weight, can delay progressive metabolic worsening. These observations underscore the importance of lifestyle management including weight loss as a tool to mitigate worsening of glycemia in newly diagnosed diabetes.
Authors: M Sue Kirkman; R Ravi Shankar; Sudha Shankar; Changyu Shen; Edward Brizendine; Alain Baron; Janet McGill Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2006-09 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Abbas E Kitabchi; Marinella Temprosa; William C Knowler; Steven E Kahn; Sarah E Fowler; Steven M Haffner; Reuben Andres; Christopher Saudek; Sharon L Edelstein; Richard Arakaki; Mary Beth Murphy; Harry Shamoon Journal: Diabetes Date: 2005-08 Impact factor: 9.461
Authors: Donna H Ryan; Mark A Espeland; Gary D Foster; Steven M Haffner; Van S Hubbard; Karen C Johnson; Steven E Kahn; William C Knowler; Susan Z Yanovski Journal: Control Clin Trials Date: 2003-10
Authors: Steven E Kahn; John M Lachin; Bernard Zinman; Steven M Haffner; R Paul Aftring; Gitanjali Paul; Barbara G Kravitz; William H Herman; Giancarlo Viberti; Rury R Holman Journal: Diabetes Date: 2011-03-17 Impact factor: 9.461
Authors: Jinbo Hu; Yang Hu; Ellen Hertzmark; Chen Yuan; Gang Liu; Meir J Stampfer; Eric B Rimm; Frank B Hu; Molin Wang; Qi Sun Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2022-02-17 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Viviana Bauman; Aviva H Ariel-Donges; Eliza L Gordon; Michael J Daniels; Dandan Xu; Kathryn M Ross; Marian C Limacher; Michael G Perri Journal: BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care Date: 2019-05-28
Authors: Se Hwan Park; Jin Hwan Yoon; Dae Yun Seo; Tae Nyun Kim; Jeong Rim Ko; Jin Han Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-03-07 Impact factor: 3.390