Literature DB >> 27530698

Distinct current modules shape cellular dynamics in model neurons.

Adel Alturki1, Feng Feng1, Ajay Nair2, Vinay Guntu1, Satish S Nair3.   

Abstract

Numerous intrinsic currents are known to collectively shape neuronal membrane potential dynamics, or neuronal signatures. Although how sets of currents shape specific signatures such as spiking characteristics or oscillations has been studied individually, it is less clear how a neuron's suite of currents jointly shape its entire set of signatures. Biophysical conductance-based models of neurons represent a viable tool to address this important question. We hypothesized that currents are grouped into distinct modules that shape specific neuronal characteristics or signatures, such as resting potential, sub-threshold oscillations, and spiking waveforms, for several classes of neurons. For such a grouping to occur, the currents within one module should have minimal functional interference with currents belonging to other modules. This condition is satisfied if the gating functions of currents in the same module are grouped together on the voltage axis; in contrast, such functions are segregated along the voltage axis for currents belonging to different modules. We tested this hypothesis using four published example case models and found it to be valid for these classes of neurons. This insight into the neurobiological organization of currents also suggests an intuitive, systematic, and robust methodology to develop biophysical single-cell models with multiple biological characteristics applicable for both hand- and automated-tuning approaches. We illustrate the methodology using two example case rodent pyramidal neurons, from the lateral amygdala and the hippocampus. The methodology also helped reveal that a single-core compartment model could capture multiple neuronal properties. Such biophysical single-compartment models have potential to improve the fidelity of large network models.
Copyright © 2016 IBRO. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biophysical model; current modules; neuronal signatures

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27530698      PMCID: PMC5086448          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.08.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroscience        ISSN: 0306-4522            Impact factor:   3.590


  64 in total

1.  Automated optimization of a reduced layer 5 pyramidal cell model based on experimental data.

Authors:  Armin Bahl; Martin B Stemmler; Andreas V M Herz; Arnd Roth
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2012-04-13       Impact factor: 2.390

2.  Exact simulation of integrate-and-fire models with synaptic conductances.

Authors:  Romain Brette
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.026

3.  Dynamical mechanisms of odor processing in olfactory bulb mitral cells.

Authors:  Daniel B Rubin; Thomas A Cleland
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-05-17       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 4.  Modeling single-neuron dynamics and computations: a balance of detail and abstraction.

Authors:  Andreas V M Herz; Tim Gollisch; Christian K Machens; Dieter Jaeger
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-10-06       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  An active membrane model of the cerebellar Purkinje cell. I. Simulation of current clamps in slice.

Authors:  E De Schutter; J M Bower
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 6.  Variability, compensation, and modulation in neurons and circuits.

Authors:  Eve Marder
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-03-07       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Determinants of voltage attenuation in neocortical pyramidal neuron dendrites.

Authors:  G Stuart; N Spruston
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1998-05-15       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 8.  Neuromodulation of circuits with variable parameters: single neurons and small circuits reveal principles of state-dependent and robust neuromodulation.

Authors:  Eve Marder; Timothy O'Leary; Sonal Shruti
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 12.449

9.  Synaptic competition in the lateral amygdala and the stimulus specificity of conditioned fear: a biophysical modeling study.

Authors:  D Kim; P Samarth; F Feng; D Pare; Satish S Nair
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 3.270

10.  Channel density distributions explain spiking variability in the globus pallidus: a combined physiology and computer simulation database approach.

Authors:  Cengiz Günay; Jeremy R Edgerton; Dieter Jaeger
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-07-23       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  6 in total

1.  Inferring Morphology of a Neuron from In Vivo LFP Data.

Authors:  Ziao Chen; Dan Dopp; Drew B Headley; Satish S Nair
Journal:  Int IEEE EMBS Conf Neural Eng       Date:  2021-06-02

2.  An Efficient Pipeline for Biophysical Modeling of Neurons.

Authors:  Nathaniel Opsal; Pete Canfield; Tyler Banks; Satish S Nair
Journal:  Int IEEE EMBS Conf Neural Eng       Date:  2021-06-02

3.  Model neocortical microcircuit supports beta and gamma rhythms.

Authors:  Feng Feng; Drew B Headley; Satish S Nair
Journal:  Int IEEE EMBS Conf Neural Eng       Date:  2021-06-02

4.  Gamma Oscillations in the Basolateral Amygdala: Biophysical Mechanisms and Computational Consequences.

Authors:  Feng Feng; Drew B Headley; Alon Amir; Vasiliki Kanta; Ziao Chen; Denis Paré; Satish S Nair
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2019-02-05

5.  Gamma oscillations in the basolateral amygdala: localization, microcircuitry, and behavioral correlates.

Authors:  Drew B Headley; Pinelopi Kyriazi; Feng Feng; Satish Nair; Denis Pare
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 6.709

6.  Microcircuit mechanisms for the generation of sharp-wave ripples in the basolateral amygdala: A role for chandelier interneurons.

Authors:  Madhusoothanan B Perumal; Benjamin Latimer; Li Xu; Peter Stratton; Satish Nair; Pankaj Sah
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 9.995

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.