Literature DB >> 27530301

Performance of bioactive PMMA-based bone cement under load-bearing conditions: an in vivo evaluation and FE simulation.

Andreas Fottner1, Berthold Nies2, Denis Kitanovic3, Arnd Steinbrück3, Susanne Mayer-Wagner3, Christian Schröder3, Sascha Heinemann2, Ulrich Pohl4, Volkmar Jansson3.   

Abstract

In the past, bioactive bone cement was investigated in order to improve the durability of cemented arthroplasties by strengthening the bone-cement interface. As direct bone-cement bonding may theoretically lead to higher stresses within the cement, the question arises, whether polymethylmethacrylate features suitable mechanical properties to withstand altered stress conditions? To answer this question, in vivo experiments and finite element simulations were conducted. Twelve rabbits were divided into two groups examining either bioactive polymethylmethacrylate-based cement with unchanged mechanical properties or commercially available polymethylmethacrylate cement. The cements were tested under load-bearing conditions over a period of 7 months, using a spacer prosthesis cemented into the femur. For the finite element analyses, boundary conditions of the rabbit femur were simulated and analyses were performed with respect to different loading scenarios. Calculations of equivalent stress distributions within the cements were applied, with a completely bonded cement surface for the bioactive cement and with a continuously interfering fibrous tissue layer for the reference cement. The bioactive cement revealed good in vivo bioactivity. In the bioactive cement group two failures (33 %), with complete break-out of the prosthesis occurred, while none in the reference group. Finite element analyses of simulated bioactive cement fixation showed an increase in maximal equivalent stress by 49.2 to 109.4 % compared to the simulation of reference cement. The two failures as well as an increase in calculated equivalent stress highlight the importance of fatigue properties of polymethylmethacrylate in general and especially when developing bioactive cements designated for load-bearing conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27530301     DOI: 10.1007/s10856-016-5754-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med        ISSN: 0957-4530            Impact factor:   3.896


  34 in total

1.  Apatite formation on non-woven fabric of carboxymethylated chitin in SBF.

Authors:  Tadashi Kokubo; Masayuki Hanakawa; Masakazu Kawashita; Masahiko Minoda; Toshiyuki Beppu; Takeaki Miyamoto; Takashi Nakamura
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 12.479

2.  Bioactive polymethyl methacrylate-based bone cement: comparison of glass beads, apatite- and wollastonite-containing glass-ceramic, and hydroxyapatite fillers on mechanical and biological properties.

Authors:  S Shinzato; M Kobayashi; W F Mousa; M Kamimura; M Neo; Y Kitamura; T Kokubo; T Nakamura
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  2000-08

3.  Pressurization and centralization enhance the quality and reproducibility of cement mantles.

Authors:  P C Noble; M B Collier; J A Maltry; E Kamaric; H S Tullos
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Hip contact forces and gait patterns from routine activities.

Authors:  G Bergmann; G Deuretzbacher; M Heller; F Graichen; A Rohlmann; J Strauss; G N Duda
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Bioactive bone cement: effects of phosphoric ester monomer on mechanical properties and osteoconductivity.

Authors:  S Shinzato; T Nakamura; J Tamura; T Kokubo; Y Kitamura
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  2001-09-15

6.  Reduction in cement-bone interface shear strength between primary and revision arthroplasty.

Authors:  Y Dohmae; J E Bechtold; R E Sherman; R M Puno; R B Gustilo
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Intercalary replacement of canine femora using a new bioactive bone cement.

Authors:  Y Senaha; T Nakamura; J Tamura; K Kawanabe; H Iida; T Yamamuro
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1996-01

8.  Mechanical properties of the fibrous tissue found at the bone-cement interface following total joint replacement.

Authors:  R Y Hori; J L Lewis
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1982-11

9.  Bone cements and fillers: a review.

Authors:  S M Kenny; M Buggy
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 10.  Bioactive bone cements.

Authors:  E J Harper
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 1.617

View more
  2 in total

1.  Enhanced osteointegration of poly(methylmethacrylate) bone cements by incorporating strontium-containing borate bioactive glass.

Authors:  Xu Cui; Chengcheng Huang; Meng Zhang; Changshun Ruan; Songlin Peng; Li Li; Wenlong Liu; Ting Wang; Bing Li; Wenhai Huang; Mohamed N Rahaman; William W Lu; Haobo Pan
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Poly (Methyl Methacrylate)/Biphasic Calcium Phosphate/Nano Graphene Bone Cement for Orthopedic Application.

Authors:  Farnoosh Pahlevanzadeh; Mehdi Ebrahimian-Hosseinabadi
Journal:  J Med Signals Sens       Date:  2019 Jan-Mar
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.