| Literature DB >> 27528014 |
Subodh K Yadav1,2, Sanjeev K Sharma3, Abdullah Farooque4, Gaurav Kaushik3,5, Balwinder Kaur3, Chander M Pathak3, Bilikere S Dwarakanath4,6, Krishan L Khanduja7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Smoking is one of the leading causes of millions of deaths worldwide. During cigarette smoking, most affected and highly exposed cells are the alveolar epithelium and generated oxidative stress in these cells leads to death and damage. Several studies suggested that oxidative stress causes membrane remodeling via Phospholipase A2s but in the case of cigarette smokers, mechanistically study is not yet fully defined. In view of present perspective, we evaluated the involvement of cytosolic phospholipase A2 (cPLA2) IVA as therapeutic target in cigarette smoke induced pathologies in transformed type I and type II alveolar epithelial cells.Entities:
Keywords: A549 cells; Cigarette smoke condensate; Cytosolic phospholipases A2; Inflammation; Reactive oxygen species; WI26 cells
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27528014 PMCID: PMC4986351 DOI: 10.1186/s12944-016-0300-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Lipids Health Dis ISSN: 1476-511X Impact factor: 3.876
Fig. 1Effect of CSC treatment on cell viability (MTT assay) in A-549 and WI-26 cells. Both cell lines were treated with different concentrations of CSC for 24 h. The results are expressed as mean ± SD of three different experiments. *,#, p < 0.05. *CSC compared with A549 control. #CSC compared with WI26 control. Concentrations of CSC were in μg/ml
Fig. 2Effect of CSC treatment at different concentrations on ROS production in lung epithelial type II (A-549) cells (a) and lung epithelial type I (WI-26) cells (b), assayed by DCHF-DA fluorescent dye. The results are expressed as mean ± SD of three separate experiments. p < 0.05. CSC compared with their respective control
Fig. 3Effect of CSC on cellular integrity in A-549 and WI-26 cells using FDA and EtBr uptake assay
Fig. 4SOD activity after 50 μg/ml of CSC concentration at 24 h of treatment in A549 and WI26 cells. The results are expressed as mean ± SD of three separate experiments. *,#,α p < 0.05. *CSC compared with their respective control, #A549 control compared with WI26 control and αcompared with CSC threated WI26 cells
Fig. 5PLA2 activity at 50 μg/ml of CSC concentration alone or in combinations with PLA2 isoforms specific inhibitors at 24 h of treatment time in A549 cells (a) and WI26 cells (b). The decrease in absorbance is directly proportional to PLA2 activity. The results are expressed as mean ± SD of three separate experiments. *,#p < 0.05. *CSC 50 μg/ml activity response compared with their respective control at every minutes interval. #CSC 50 μg/ml in combination with cPLA2 specific inhibitor (ATK) activity response compared with their respective CSC 50 μg/ml alone at every minutes interval
Fig. 6mRNA expression of different cPLA2 groups at constitutive level (a) and in presence of different concentrations of CSC (b) in A549 and WI26 cells. β-actin was used as an internal control for normalization of mRNA levels of cPLA2 groups