Literature DB >> 27526044

A typology for strategies to connect citizen science and management.

Amy Freitag1.   

Abstract

One of the often cited benefits of citizen science is better connecting citizens and their science to adaptive management outcomes. However, there is no consensus as to whether this is a reasonable expectation, and if so, how best to approach creating a successful link to management. This review finds cases where the citizen science-management link is explicitly discussed and places each case into a meta-analysis framework that will help define some general successful approaches to forming such a link. We categorize the types of linkages between citizen science and management along two main axes: cooperative to adversarial and deliberate to serendipitous. Cooperative and deliberate types of linkages are the most common, likely due to a mix of causes: that such links are the most commonly written about in the scientific literature, because such links tend to exist for longer amounts of time, and because other types of links tend to drift toward the cooperative/deliberate approach over time.

Keywords:  Adaptive management; Citizen science; Policy outcomes; Program development; Science–policy boundary

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27526044     DOI: 10.1007/s10661-016-5513-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Monit Assess        ISSN: 0167-6369            Impact factor:   2.513


  15 in total

1.  Citizen scientists generate benefits for researchers, educators, society, and themselves.

Authors:  Brenda K Wiederhold
Journal:  Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw       Date:  2011-12

Review 2.  A review of citizen science and community-based environmental monitoring: issues and opportunities.

Authors:  Cathy C Conrad; Krista G Hilchey
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2010-07-17       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Collaborative science, policy development and program implementation in the transboundary Georgia Basin/Puget Sound ecosystem.

Authors:  David A Fraser; Joseph K Gaydos; Erik Karlsen; Michael S Rylko
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.513

4.  Community based ecological monitoring in Nova Scotia: challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Andy Sharpe; Cathy Conrad
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.513

5.  Local participation in natural resource monitoring: a characterization of approaches.

Authors:  Finn Danielsen; Neil D Burgess; Andrew Balmford; Paul F Donald; Mikkel Funder; Julia P G Jones; Philip Alviola; Danilo S Balete; Tom Blomley; Justin Brashares; Brian Child; Martin Enghoff; Jon Fjeldså; Sune Holt; Hanne Hübertz; Arne E Jensen; Per M Jensen; John Massao; Marlynn M Mendoza; Yonika Ngaga; Michael K Poulsen; Ricardo Rueda; Moses Sam; Thomas Skielboe; Greg Stuart-Hill; Elmer Topp-Jørgensen; Deki Yonten
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2008-09-15       Impact factor: 6.560

6.  Comparing volunteer and professionally collected monitoring data from the rocky subtidal reefs of Southern California, USA.

Authors:  David J Gillett; Daniel J Pondella; Jan Freiwald; Kenneth C Schiff; Jennifer E Caselle; Craig Shuman; Stephen B Weisberg
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2011-07-08       Impact factor: 2.513

7.  Collaborative assessment of California spiny lobster population and fishery responses to a marine reserve network.

Authors:  Matthew C Kay; Hunter S Lenihan; Carla M Guenther; Jono R Wilson; Christopher J Miller; Samuel W Shrout
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.657

Review 8.  Knowledge systems for sustainable development.

Authors:  David W Cash; William C Clark; Frank Alcock; Nancy M Dickson; Noelle Eckley; David H Guston; Jill Jäger; Ronald B Mitchell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-05-30       Impact factor: 12.779

9.  Snapshot Serengeti, high-frequency annotated camera trap images of 40 mammalian species in an African savanna.

Authors:  Alexandra Swanson; Margaret Kosmala; Chris Lintott; Robert Simpson; Arfon Smith; Craig Packer
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 6.444

10.  Process, not product: investigating recommendations for improving citizen science "success".

Authors:  Amy Freitag; Max J Pfeffer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.