Literature DB >> 18798859

Local participation in natural resource monitoring: a characterization of approaches.

Finn Danielsen1, Neil D Burgess, Andrew Balmford, Paul F Donald, Mikkel Funder, Julia P G Jones, Philip Alviola, Danilo S Balete, Tom Blomley, Justin Brashares, Brian Child, Martin Enghoff, Jon Fjeldså, Sune Holt, Hanne Hübertz, Arne E Jensen, Per M Jensen, John Massao, Marlynn M Mendoza, Yonika Ngaga, Michael K Poulsen, Ricardo Rueda, Moses Sam, Thomas Skielboe, Greg Stuart-Hill, Elmer Topp-Jørgensen, Deki Yonten.   

Abstract

The monitoring of trends in the status of species or habitats is routine in developed countries, where it is funded by the state or large nongovernmental organizations and often involves large numbers of skilled amateur volunteers. Far less monitoring of natural resources takes place in developing countries, where state agencies have small budgets, there are fewer skilled professionals or amateurs, and socioeconomic conditions prevent development of a culture of volunteerism. The resulting lack of knowledge about trends in species and habitats presents a serious challenge for detecting, understanding, and reversing declines in natural resource values. International environmental agreements require signatories undertake systematic monitoring of their natural resources, but no system exists to guide the development and expansion of monitoring schemes. To help develop such a protocol, we suggest a typology of monitoring categories, defined by their degree of local participation, ranging from no local involvement with monitoring undertaken by professional researchers to an entirely local effort with monitoring undertaken by local people. We assessed the strengths and weaknesses of each monitoring category and the potential of each to be sustainable in developed or developing countries. Locally based monitoring is particularly relevant in developing countries, where it can lead to rapid decisions to solve the key threats affecting natural resources, can empower local communities to better manage their resources, and can refine sustainable-use strategies to improve local livelihoods. Nevertheless, we recognize that the accuracy and precision of the monitoring undertaken by local communities in different situations needs further study and field protocols need to be further developed to get the best from the unrealized potential of this approach. A challenge to conservation biologists is to identify and establish the monitoring system most relevant to a particular situation and to develop methods to integrate outputs from across the spectrum of monitoring schemes to produce wider indices of natural resources that capture the strengths of each.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18798859     DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01063.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conserv Biol        ISSN: 0888-8892            Impact factor:   6.560


  27 in total

1.  A systems approach to modeling Community-Based Environmental Monitoring: a case of participatory water quality monitoring in rural Mexico.

Authors:  Ana Burgos; Rosaura Páez; Estela Carmona; Hilda Rivas
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2013-07-13       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Stakeholder opinions on the assessment of MPA effectiveness and their interests to participate at Pacific Rim National Park Reserve, Canada.

Authors:  Nadine Heck; Philip Dearden; Adrian McDonald; Steve Carver
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2011-01-22       Impact factor: 3.266

Review 3.  Storing and sharing: A review of indigenous and local knowledge conservation initiatives.

Authors:  Petra Benyei; Guadalupe Arreola; Victoria Reyes-García
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2019-03-11       Impact factor: 5.129

4.  Student monitoring of the ecological quality of neotropical urban streams.

Authors:  Juliana Silva França; Ricardo Solar; Robert M Hughes; Marcos Callisto
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2018-11-17       Impact factor: 5.129

5.  Lessons from a Community-Based Program to Monitor Forest Vertebrates in the Brazilian Amazon.

Authors:  Maíra Benchimol; Eduardo M von Mühlen; Eduardo M Venticinque
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 3.266

6.  Biodiversity monitoring at the Tonle Sap Lake of Cambodia: a comparative assessment of local methods.

Authors:  Sophat Seak; Dietrich Schmidt-Vogt; Gopal B Thapa
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2012-07-29       Impact factor: 3.266

7.  Completing the Picture: Importance of Considering Participatory Mapping for REDD+ Measurement, Reporting and Verification (MRV).

Authors:  Guillaume Beaudoin; Serge Rafanoharana; Manuel Boissière; Arief Wijaya; Wahyu Wardhana
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  A typology for strategies to connect citizen science and management.

Authors:  Amy Freitag
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2016-08-15       Impact factor: 2.513

9.  Who Wants to Save the Forest? Characterizing Community-Led Monitoring in Prey Lang, Cambodia.

Authors:  Nerea Turreira-García; Henrik Meilby; Søren Brofeldt; Dimitris Argyriou; Ida Theilade
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 3.266

10.  Rapid survey protocol that provides dynamic information on reef condition to managers of the Great Barrier Reef.

Authors:  R J Beeden; M A Turner; J Dryden; F Merida; K Goudkamp; C Malone; P A Marshall; A Birtles; J A Maynard
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 2.513

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.