Literature DB >> 2300626

Toward CT-based facial fracture treatment.

P N Manson1, B Markowitz, S Mirvis, M Dunham, M Yaremchuk.   

Abstract

Facial fractures have formerly been classified solely by anatomic location. CT scans now identify the exact fracture pattern in a specific area. Fracture patterns are classified as low, middle, or high energy, defined solely by the pattern of segmentation and displacement in the CT scan. Exposure and fixation relate directly to the fracture pattern for each anatomic area of the face, including frontal bone, frontal sinus, zygoma, nose, nasoethmoidal-orbital region, midface, and mandible. Fractures with little comminution and displacement were accompanied by subtle symptoms and required simple treatment; middle-energy injuries were treated by standard surgical approaches and rigid fixation. Highly comminuted fractures were accompanied by dramatic instability and marked alterations in facial architecture; only multiple surgical approaches to fully visualize the "buttress" system provided alignment and fixation. Classification of facial fractures by (1) anatomic location and (2) pattern of comminution and displacement define refined guidelines for exposure and fixation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2300626

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  29 in total

Review 1.  [Computer-aided reconstruction of the facial skeleton : Planning and implementation in clinical routine].

Authors:  F Wilde; A Schramm
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  [Maxillofacial fractures: midface and internal orbit : Part 1: classification and diagnosis].

Authors:  G Mast; M Ehrenfeld; C P Cornelius
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.000

3.  Utility of computed tomography scans in predicting need for surgery in nasal injuries.

Authors:  Benjamin E Peterson; Timothy D Doerr
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2013-12

Review 4.  Frontal sinus fractures: a conservative shift.

Authors:  William M Weathers; Erik M Wolfswinkel; Daniel A Hatef; Edward I Lee; Rodger H Brown; Larry H Hollier
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2013-06-26

5.  Sphenoid sinus and sphenoid bone fractures in patients with craniomaxillofacial trauma.

Authors:  Jorge Ernesto Cantini Ardila; Miguel Ángel Rivera Mendoza; Viviana Gómez Ortega
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2013-06-05

6.  The Comprehensive AOCMF Classification System: Midface Fractures - Level 3 Tutorial.

Authors:  Carl-Peter Cornelius; Laurent Audigé; Christoph Kunz; Carlos H Buitrago-Téllez; Randal Rudderman; Joachim Prein
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2014-12

7.  The Comprehensive AOCMF Classification System: Midface Fractures - Level 2 Tutorial.

Authors:  Christoph Kunz; Laurent Audigé; Carl-Peter Cornelius; Carlos H Buitrago-Téllez; John Frodel; Randal Rudderman; Joachim Prein
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2014-12

8.  Titanium mesh reconstruction of orbital roof fracture with traumatic encephalocele: a case report and review of literature.

Authors:  Nitin J Mokal; Mahinoor F Desai
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2012-03

Review 9.  Facial fractures.

Authors:  M M Carr; A Freiberg; R D Martin
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 3.275

10.  A prospective analysis of physical examination findings in the diagnosis of facial fractures: Determining predictive value.

Authors:  Alisa Timashpolsky; Alexander B Dagum; Syed M Sayeed; Jamie L Romeiser; Elisheva A Rosenfeld; Nicole Conkling
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2016-05-27       Impact factor: 0.947

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.