Literature DB >> 27525370

Feasibility and safety of Reveal LINQ insertion in a sterile procedure room versus electrophysiology laboratory.

Geoffrey R Wong1, Dennis H Lau1, Melissa E Middeldorp1, Judith A Harrington1, Simon Stolcman1, Lauren Wilson1, Darragh J Twomey1, Sharath Kumar1, Dian A Munawar1, Kashif B Khokhar1, Rajiv Mahajan1, Prashanthan Sanders2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Insertable cardiac monitors (ICMs) are increasingly utilized for diagnosis of unexplained syncope and arrhythmia monitoring. The Reveal LINQ is a novel miniaturized ICM with improved algorithms. The feasibility and safety of insertion outside the traditional electrophysiology laboratory is unknown. Here we compare outcomes of Reveal LINQ insertion in different environments.
METHODS: We report on a prospective, single-centre, non-randomized, observational experience of consecutive Reveal LINQ implantation in the electrophysiology laboratory or a procedure room between October 2013 and October 2015.
RESULTS: Of 178 consecutive patients who underwent LINQ device insertion, 80 were implanted in the electrophysiology laboratory and 98 in a procedure room. There were no significant differences in baseline patient characteristics. All implants were performed in the recommended manufacturer method with the exception of 1 which required suture closure. Only a minority received peri-procedural antibiotics with a greater number in the electrophysiology laboratory group (11 [14%] versus 1 [1%], p=0.007). Overall, there were 3 (1.7%) complications with no significant difference between the electrophysiology laboratory and the procedure room groups (2 [3%] versus 1 [1%], p=0.45). There was 1 superficial infection in the procedure room group and 1 superficial infection with device extrusion and 1 traumatic extrusion in the electrophysiology laboratory group. Procedure room implantation subjectively improved laboratory efficiency and patient flow.
CONCLUSION: Reveal LINQ insertion can be safely performed outside of the cardiac laboratory provided a sterile technique is followed by the operator using manufacturer recommendations for insertion. These findings have significant resource implications for hospitals undertaking such procedures. Crown
Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Device infection; Implantable Loop Recorder; Insertable cardiac monitor; Outpatient procedure room; Reveal LINQ

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27525370     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.08.113

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiol        ISSN: 0167-5273            Impact factor:   4.164


  9 in total

1.  Placement of Reveal LINQ Device in the Left Anterior Axillary Position.

Authors:  Heather Anderson; Joseph Dearani; M Yasir Qureshi; Kimberly Holst; Patrick O'Leary; Bryan Cannon; Philip Wackel
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 1.655

Review 2.  The Role of Implantable Cardiac Monitors in Atrial Fibrillation Management.

Authors:  Giuseppe Ciconte; Daniele Giacopelli; Carlo Pappone
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2017-08-31

3.  Implantable loop recorders in the real world: a study of two Canadian centers.

Authors:  Omar A Ibrahim; Doran Drew; Christopher J Hayes; William McIntyre; Colette M Seifer; Wilma Hopman; Benedict Glover; Adrian M Baranchuk
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 1.900

4.  How to get the optimal defibrillation lead parameters using myocardial perfusion scintigraphy in patients with coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Tariel A Atabekov; Roman E Batalov; Svetlana I Sazonova; Sergey N Krivolapov; Mikhail S Khlynin; Anna I Mishkina; Konstantin V Zavadovsky; Antonio Curnis; Sergey V Popov
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 5.  [Indications for loop recorder implantation for syncope].

Authors:  Andreas Schuchert
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2018-05-02

6.  Atrial fibrillation in cryptogenic stroke and transient ischaemic attack - The Nordic Atrial Fibrillation and Stroke (NOR-FIB) Study: Rationale and design.

Authors:  Barbara Ratajczak-Tretel; Anna Tancin Lambert; Henriette Johansen; Bente Halvorsen; Vigdis Bjerkeli; David Russell; Else Charlotte Sandset; Hege Ihle-Hansen; Erik Eriksen; Halvor Næss; Vojtech Novotny; Andrej Netland Khanevski; Thomas C Truelsen; Titto Idicula; Karen L Ægidius; Håkon Tobro; Siv B Krogseth; Håkon Ihle-Hansen; Guri Hagberg; Christina Kruuse; Kathrine Arntzen; Grete K Bakkejord; Maja Villseth; Ingvild Nakstad; Guttorm Eldøen; Raheel Shafiq; Anne Gulsvik; Martin Kurz; Mehdi Rezai; Jesper Sømark; Stein-Helge Tingvoll; Christine Jonassen; Susanne Ingebrigtsen; Linn Hofsøy Steffensen; Christine Kremer; Dan Atar; Anne Hege Aamodt
Journal:  Eur Stroke J       Date:  2019-03-19

7.  Safety of in-hospital insertable cardiac monitor procedures performed outside the traditional settings: results from the Reveal LINQ in-office 2 international study.

Authors:  Prashanthan Sanders; Christopher Piorkowski; Johannes A Kragten; Grahame K Goode; Satish R Raj; Trang Dinh; M Rizwan Sohail; Rishi Anand; Angel Moya-Mitjans; Noreli Franco; Kurt Stromberg; John D Rogers
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 2.298

Review 8.  Cardiac monitoring for patients with palpitations.

Authors:  Jaume Francisco-Pascual; Javier Cantalapiedra-Romero; Jordi Pérez-Rodon; Begoña Benito; Alba Santos-Ortega; Jenson Maldonado; Ignacio Ferreira-Gonzalez; Nuria Rivas-Gándara
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2021-11-26

9.  Diagnostic value of implantable loop recorder in patients undergoing cryoballoon ablation of atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Aleksander Kusiak; Marek Jastrzębski; Adam Bednarski; Piotr Kułakowski; Roman Piotrowski; Edward Koźluk; Artur Baszko; Danuta Czarnecka
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2019-12-21       Impact factor: 1.468

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.