Literature DB >> 27671642

Neural correlate of the construction of sentence meaning.

Evelina Fedorenko1, Terri L Scott2, Peter Brunner3, William G Coon4, Brianna Pritchett5, Gerwin Schalk6, Nancy Kanwisher7.   

Abstract

The neural processes that underlie your ability to read and understand this sentence are unknown. Sentence comprehension occurs very rapidly, and can only be understood at a mechanistic level by discovering the precise sequence of underlying computational and neural events. However, we have no continuous and online neural measure of sentence processing with high spatial and temporal resolution. Here we report just such a measure: intracranial recordings from the surface of the human brain show that neural activity, indexed by γ-power, increases monotonically over the course of a sentence as people read it. This steady increase in activity is absent when people read and remember nonword-lists, despite the higher cognitive demand entailed, ruling out accounts in terms of generic attention, working memory, and cognitive load. Response increases are lower for sentence structure without meaning ("Jabberwocky" sentences) and word meaning without sentence structure (word-lists), showing that this effect is not explained by responses to syntax or word meaning alone. Instead, the full effect is found only for sentences, implicating compositional processes of sentence understanding, a striking and unique feature of human language not shared with animal communication systems. This work opens up new avenues for investigating the sequence of neural events that underlie the construction of linguistic meaning.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ECoG; compositionality; language; semantics; syntax

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27671642      PMCID: PMC5068329          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1612132113

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  68 in total

1.  Distinct patterns of neural modulation during the processing of conceptual and syntactic anomalies.

Authors:  Gina R Kuperberg; Phillip J Holcomb; Tatiana Sitnikova; Douglas Greve; Anders M Dale; David Caplan
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2003-02-15       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping.

Authors:  Elizabeth Bates; Stephen M Wilson; Ayse Pinar Saygin; Frederic Dick; Martin I Sereno; Robert T Knight; Nina F Dronkers
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  An FMRI study of syntactic adaptation.

Authors:  U Noppeney; C J Price
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 4.  Prediction during language comprehension: benefits, costs, and ERP components.

Authors:  Cyma Van Petten; Barbara J Luka
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 2.997

5.  Expectation-based syntactic comprehension.

Authors:  Roger Levy
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2007-07-30

6.  Spatiotemporal imaging of cortical activation during verb generation and picture naming.

Authors:  Erik Edwards; Srikantan S Nagarajan; Sarang S Dalal; Ryan T Canolty; Heidi E Kirsch; Nicholas M Barbaro; Robert T Knight
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-12-21       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity.

Authors:  M Kutas; S A Hillyard
Journal:  Science       Date:  1980-01-11       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Sequential processing of lexical, grammatical, and phonological information within Broca's area.

Authors:  Ned T Sahin; Steven Pinker; Sydney S Cash; Donald Schomer; Eric Halgren
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-10-16       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Broadband shifts in local field potential power spectra are correlated with single-neuron spiking in humans.

Authors:  Jeremy R Manning; Joshua Jacobs; Itzhak Fried; Michael J Kahana
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Sensory-motor transformations for speech occur bilaterally.

Authors:  Gregory B Cogan; Thomas Thesen; Chad Carlson; Werner Doyle; Orrin Devinsky; Bijan Pesaran
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  33 in total

1.  The Quest for the FFA and Where It Led.

Authors:  Nancy Kanwisher
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Can neuroimaging help aphasia researchers? Addressing generalizability, variability, and interpretability.

Authors:  Idan A Blank; Swathi Kiran; Evelina Fedorenko
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2017-11-30       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  fMRI reveals language-specific predictive coding during naturalistic sentence comprehension.

Authors:  Cory Shain; Idan Asher Blank; Marten van Schijndel; William Schuler; Evelina Fedorenko
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  The temporal dynamics of structure and content in sentence comprehension: Evidence from fMRI-constrained MEG.

Authors:  William Matchin; Christian Brodbeck; Christopher Hammerly; Ellen Lau
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  An Attempt to Conceptually Replicate the Dissociation between Syntax and Semantics during Sentence Comprehension.

Authors:  Matthew Siegelman; Idan A Blank; Zachary Mineroff; Evelina Fedorenko
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 3.590

6.  Amplification of local changes along the timescale processing hierarchy.

Authors:  Yaara Yeshurun; Mai Nguyen; Uri Hasson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-08-15       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Hierarchical Encoding of Attended Auditory Objects in Multi-talker Speech Perception.

Authors:  James O'Sullivan; Jose Herrero; Elliot Smith; Catherine Schevon; Guy M McKhann; Sameer A Sheth; Ashesh D Mehta; Nima Mesgarani
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  Domain-General Brain Regions Do Not Track Linguistic Input as Closely as Language-Selective Regions.

Authors:  Idan A Blank; Evelina Fedorenko
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-09-04       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  The Domain-General Multiple Demand (MD) Network Does Not Support Core Aspects of Language Comprehension: A Large-Scale fMRI Investigation.

Authors:  Evgeniia Diachek; Idan Blank; Matthew Siegelman; Josef Affourtit; Evelina Fedorenko
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Passive functional mapping of receptive language areas using electrocorticographic signals.

Authors:  J R Swift; W G Coon; C Guger; P Brunner; M Bunch; T Lynch; B Frawley; A L Ritaccio; G Schalk
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 3.708

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.