Daniel E Spratt1, Hebert A Vargas2, Zachary S Zumsteg3, Jennifer S Golia Pernicka2, Joseph R Osborne2, Xin Pei3, Michael J Zelefsky4. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 48109, USA. 2. Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. 3. Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. 4. Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. Electronic address: zelefskm@mskcc.org.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Clinical trials evaluating the benefit of pelvic radiotherapy (PRT) in the radiotherapeutic management of patients with higher-risk prostate cancer have limited the superior field border to the S1/S2 or L5/S1 interspace. However, imaging and surgical series have demonstrated a high frequency of prostatic lymph node (LN) drainage beyond these landmarks. OBJECTIVE: To determine the patterns of radiographically defined abdominopelvic LN failures and their potential implications for PRT field design. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: During 1992-2008, 2694 patients with localized prostate cancer were treated with prostate/seminal vesicle-only radiotherapy without PRT. Some 156 patients had their first failure within the abdominopelvic LNs, of whom 60 had isolated failures within the pelvic LNs. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: A radiologist reviewed all imaging and mapped each LN failure to a template consisting of 34 abdominopelvic LN stations. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: The median follow-up was 8.9 yr. Of patients who experienced first recurrence in the pelvic LNs (n=60), the common iliac station was involved in 55% (n=33) of patients, including 10% (n=6) who had isolated common iliac failures. Use of a PRT field superior border of L5/S1 would fully cover only 42% of the first recurrences among these patients. Extending the field to cover the common iliac stations would increase coverage to 93% of recurrences. The presence of T3/T4 disease and omission of androgen-deprivation therapy both independently conferred an approximate fivefold increase in the likelihood of having a common iliac LN failure. Use of imaging as a surrogate for LN involvement is the primary study limitation. CONCLUSIONS: Pelvic LN failures frequently occur superior to the commonly used L5/S1 landmark for PRT coverage, and use of ADT may be protective of more superior LN failures. The current RTOG 0924 trial is evaluating the benefit of PRT with extended superior coverage to L4/5 when possible, which, according to our data, should significantly improve the coverage of potential sites of failure. PATIENT SUMMARY: We looked at lymph node recurrence patterns after external beam radiotherapy of the prostate in men who did not have their lymph nodes treated. We found that there was a high incidence of pelvic lymph node recurrences above the internal and external iliac lymph node regions. Therefore, the current field recommendation for pelvic lymph nodes that stops at the superior border of the internal and external iliac vessels provides inadequate coverage of common sites of cancer recurrence, namely the common iliac lymph nodes.
BACKGROUND: Clinical trials evaluating the benefit of pelvic radiotherapy (PRT) in the radiotherapeutic management of patients with higher-risk prostate cancer have limited the superior field border to the S1/S2 or L5/S1 interspace. However, imaging and surgical series have demonstrated a high frequency of prostatic lymph node (LN) drainage beyond these landmarks. OBJECTIVE: To determine the patterns of radiographically defined abdominopelvic LN failures and their potential implications for PRT field design. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: During 1992-2008, 2694 patients with localized prostate cancer were treated with prostate/seminal vesicle-only radiotherapy without PRT. Some 156 patients had their first failure within the abdominopelvic LNs, of whom 60 had isolated failures within the pelvic LNs. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: A radiologist reviewed all imaging and mapped each LN failure to a template consisting of 34 abdominopelvic LN stations. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: The median follow-up was 8.9 yr. Of patients who experienced first recurrence in the pelvic LNs (n=60), the common iliac station was involved in 55% (n=33) of patients, including 10% (n=6) who had isolated common iliac failures. Use of a PRT field superior border of L5/S1 would fully cover only 42% of the first recurrences among these patients. Extending the field to cover the common iliac stations would increase coverage to 93% of recurrences. The presence of T3/T4 disease and omission of androgen-deprivation therapy both independently conferred an approximate fivefold increase in the likelihood of having a common iliac LN failure. Use of imaging as a surrogate for LN involvement is the primary study limitation. CONCLUSIONS: Pelvic LN failures frequently occur superior to the commonly used L5/S1 landmark for PRT coverage, and use of ADT may be protective of more superior LN failures. The current RTOG 0924 trial is evaluating the benefit of PRT with extended superior coverage to L4/5 when possible, which, according to our data, should significantly improve the coverage of potential sites of failure. PATIENT SUMMARY: We looked at lymph node recurrence patterns after external beam radiotherapy of the prostate in men who did not have their lymph nodes treated. We found that there was a high incidence of pelvic lymph node recurrences above the internal and external iliac lymph node regions. Therefore, the current field recommendation for pelvic lymph nodes that stops at the superior border of the internal and external iliac vessels provides inadequate coverage of common sites of cancer recurrence, namely the common iliac lymph nodes.
Authors: S O Asbell; J M Krall; M V Pilepich; H Baerwald; W T Sause; G E Hanks; C A Perez Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 1988-12 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Zachary S Zumsteg; Daniel E Spratt; Paul B Romesser; Xin Pei; Zhigang Zhang; Marisa Kollmeier; Sean McBride; Yoshiya Yamada; Michael J Zelefsky Journal: J Urol Date: 2015-07-10 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Daniel E Spratt; Zachary S Zumsteg; Xin Pei; Paul B Romesser; Josh Yamada; Marisa A Kollmeier; Kaitlin Woo; Zhigang Zhang; Michael J Zelefsky Journal: Prostate Date: 2014-10-18 Impact factor: 4.104
Authors: Colleen A F Lawton; Jeff Michalski; Issam El-Naqa; Mark K Buyyounouski; W Robert Lee; Cynthia Menard; Elizabeth O'Meara; Seth A Rosenthal; Mark Ritter; Michael Seider Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2008-10-22 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Daniel E Spratt; Michael J Evans; Brian J Davis; Michael G Doran; Man Xia Lee; Neel Shah; John Wongvipat; Kathryn E Carnazza; George G Klee; William Polkinghorn; Donald J Tindall; Jason S Lewis; Charles L Sawyers Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2015-10-02 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: William R Polkinghorn; Joel S Parker; Man X Lee; Elizabeth M Kass; Daniel E Spratt; Phillip J Iaquinta; Vivek K Arora; Wei-Feng Yen; Ling Cai; Deyou Zheng; Brett S Carver; Yu Chen; Philip A Watson; Neel P Shah; Sho Fujisawa; Alexander G Goglia; Anuradha Gopalan; Haley Hieronymus; John Wongvipat; Peter T Scardino; Michael J Zelefsky; Maria Jasin; Jayanta Chaudhuri; Simon N Powell; Charles L Sawyers Journal: Cancer Discov Date: 2013-09-11 Impact factor: 39.397
Authors: Andreas Schörghofer; Michael Groher; Josef Karner; Andrea Kopp; Gerhard Kametriser; Thomas Kunit; Josef Holzinger; Felix Sedlmayer; Frank Wolf Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2019-05-28 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: Irina Filimonova; Daniela Schmidt; Sina Mansoorian; Thomas Weissmann; Hadi Siavooshhaghighi; Alexander Cavallaro; Torsten Kuwert; Christoph Bert; Benjamin Frey; Luitpold Valentin Distel; Sebastian Lettmaier; Rainer Fietkau; Florian Putz Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2021-01-08 Impact factor: 6.244
Authors: Andrew M McDonald; Samuel J Galgano; Jonathan E McConathy; Eddy S Yang; Michael C Dobelbower; Rojymon Jacob; Soroush Rais-Bahrami; Jeffrey W Nix; Richard A Popple; John B Fiveash Journal: Adv Radiat Oncol Date: 2019-06-19
Authors: A De Bruycker; A Spiessens; P Dirix; N Koutsouvelis; I Semac; N Liefhooghe; A Gomez-Iturriaga; W Everaerts; F Otte; A Papachristofilou; M Scorsetti; M Shelan; S Siva; F Ameye; M Guckenberger; R Heikkilä; P M Putora; A Zapatero; A Conde-Moreno; F Couñago; F Vanhoutte; E Goetghebeur; D Reynders; T Zilli; P Ost Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2020-05-12 Impact factor: 4.430