Literature DB >> 20004526

Relating dose outside the prostate with freedom from failure in the Dutch trial 68 Gy vs. 78 Gy.

Marnix G Witte1, Wilma D Heemsbergen, Román Bohoslavsky, Floris J Pos, Abrahim Al-Mamgani, Joos V Lebesque, Marcel van Herk.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: For prostate cancer patients at risk for subclinical spread of the disease, we investigated whether incidental dose outside the target was associated with tumor control. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We selected 352 intermediate-risk (mainly T2b-T3a) and high-risk (mainly T3b) patients treated in a randomized trial. Target volume was prostate (68-78 Gy) and seminal vesicles (50-78 Gy). Failure (clinical or biochemical) was evaluated at 4 years. To compare three-dimensional dose distributions, an automated mapping procedure was introduced. Between patients, these maps provide an approximate identification of corresponding anatomical locations. Maps of the dose difference between patients with and without failure were constructed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed including the dose in selected points.
RESULTS: Dose differences were mainly found in the obturatorial region for the high-risk patients, and in the presacral region for the intermediate risk group (>7 Gy, p < 0.01). Univariate hazard ratios per 10 Gy for selected dose points were 0.83 (p = 0.01, obturatorial) and 0.72 (p = 0.002, presacral). These hazard ratios were stable under multivariate analysis correcting for established prognostic factors, hospital, and dose to the prostate.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients without failure have received on average a higher dose to regions where regional cancer spread could be expected.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20004526     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.04.040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  11 in total

Review 1.  Radiation oncology in the era of precision medicine.

Authors:  Michael Baumann; Mechthild Krause; Jens Overgaard; Jürgen Debus; Søren M Bentzen; Juliane Daartz; Christian Richter; Daniel Zips; Thomas Bortfeld
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 60.716

2.  The distance discordance metric-a novel approach to quantifying spatial uncertainties in intra- and inter-patient deformable image registration.

Authors:  Ziad H Saleh; Aditya P Apte; Gregory C Sharp; Nadezhda P Shusharina; Ya Wang; Harini Veeraraghavan; Maria Thor; Ludvig P Muren; Shyam S Rao; Nancy Y Lee; Joseph O Deasy
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-01-20       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Image-based data mining applies to data collected from children.

Authors:  Lydia J Wilson; Abigail Bryce-Atkinson; Andrew Green; Yimei Li; Thomas E Merchant; Marcel van Herk; Eliana Vasquez Osorio; Austin M Faught; Marianne C Aznar
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2022-05-21       Impact factor: 3.119

4.  Patterns of Lymph Node Failure after Dose-escalated Radiotherapy: Implications for Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Coverage.

Authors:  Daniel E Spratt; Hebert A Vargas; Zachary S Zumsteg; Jennifer S Golia Pernicka; Joseph R Osborne; Xin Pei; Michael J Zelefsky
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 20.096

5.  Voxel-based population analysis for correlating local dose and rectal toxicity in prostate cancer radiotherapy.

Authors:  Oscar Acosta; Gael Drean; Juan D Ospina; Antoine Simon; Pascal Haigron; Caroline Lafond; Renaud de Crevoisier
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  A comparison of a moderately hypofractionated IMRT planning technique used in a randomised UK external beam radiotherapy trial with an in-house technique for localised prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ian Gleeson
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2020-03-19

7.  Image-guided radiotherapy reduces the risk of under-dosing high-risk prostate cancer extra-capsular disease and improves biochemical control.

Authors:  Per Munck Af Rosenschold; Michael J Zelefsky; Aditya P Apte; Andrew Jackson; Jung Hun Oh; Elliot Shulman; Neil Desai; Margie Hunt; Pirus Ghadjar; Ellen Yorke; Joseph O Deasy
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 3.481

8.  A randomised assessment of image guided radiotherapy within a phase 3 trial of conventional or hypofractionated high dose intensity modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Julia Murray; Clare Griffin; Sarah Gulliford; Isabel Syndikus; John Staffurth; Miguel Panades; Christopher Scrase; Chris Parker; Vincent Khoo; Jamie Dean; Helen Mayles; Philip Mayles; Simon Thomas; Olivia Naismith; Angela Baker; Helen Mossop; Clare Cruickshank; Emma Hall; David Dearnaley
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2019-11-22       Impact factor: 6.280

9.  Multiple comparisons permutation test for image based data mining in radiotherapy.

Authors:  Chun Chen; Marnix Witte; Wilma Heemsbergen; Marcel van Herk
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2013-12-23       Impact factor: 3.481

10.  Image Based Data Mining Using Per-voxel Cox Regression.

Authors:  Andrew Green; Eliana Vasquez Osorio; Marianne C Aznar; Alan McWilliam; Marcel van Herk
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-07-21       Impact factor: 6.244

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.