Maria C Raven1,2, Lina Tieu3,4, Christopher T Lee3, Claudia Ponath3, David Guzman3,4, Margot Kushel3,4. 1. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA. 2. Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA. 3. Division of General Internal Medicine, University of California at San Francisco/San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center, San Francisco, CA. 4. Center for Vulnerable Populations, University of California at San Francisco/San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center, San Francisco, CA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The median age of single homeless adults is over 50, yet little is known about their emergency department (ED) use. We describe use of and factors associated with ED use in a sample of homeless adults 50 and older. METHODS: We recruited 350 participants who were homeless and 50 or older in Oakland, California. We interviewed participants about residential history in the prior 6 months, health status, health-related behaviors, and health services use and assessed cognition and mobility. Our primary outcome was the number of ED visits in the prior 6 months based on medical record review. We used negative binomial regression to examine factors associated with ED use. RESULTS: In the 6 months prior to enrollment, 46.3% of participants spent the majority of their time unsheltered; 25.1% cycled through multiple institutions including shelters, hospitals, and jails; 16.3% primarily stayed with family or friends; and 12.3% had become homeless recently after spending much of the prior 6 months housed. Half (49.7%) of participants made at least one ED visit in the past 6 months; 6.6% of participants accounted for 49.9% of all visits. Most (71.8%) identified a regular non-ED source of healthcare; 7.3% of visits resulted in hospitalization. In multivariate models, study participants who used multiple institutions (incidence rate ratio [IRR] = 2.27; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.08 to 4.77) and who were unsheltered (IRR = 2.29; 95% CI = 1.17 to 4.48) had higher ED use rates than participants who had been housed for most of the prior 6 months. In addition, having health insurance/coverage (IRR = 2.6; CI = 1.5 to 4.4), a history of psychiatric hospitalization (IRR = 1.80; 95% CI = 1.09 to 2.99), and severe pain (IRR = 1.72; 95% CI = 1.07 to 2.76) were associated with higher ED visit rates. CONCLUSIONS: A sample of adults aged 50 and older who were homeless at study entry had higher rates of ED use in the prior 6 months than the general U.S. age-matched population. Within the sample, ED use rates varied based on individuals' residential histories, suggesting that individuals' ED use is related to exposure to homelessness.
OBJECTIVE: The median age of single homeless adults is over 50, yet little is known about their emergency department (ED) use. We describe use of and factors associated with ED use in a sample of homeless adults 50 and older. METHODS: We recruited 350 participants who were homeless and 50 or older in Oakland, California. We interviewed participants about residential history in the prior 6 months, health status, health-related behaviors, and health services use and assessed cognition and mobility. Our primary outcome was the number of ED visits in the prior 6 months based on medical record review. We used negative binomial regression to examine factors associated with ED use. RESULTS: In the 6 months prior to enrollment, 46.3% of participants spent the majority of their time unsheltered; 25.1% cycled through multiple institutions including shelters, hospitals, and jails; 16.3% primarily stayed with family or friends; and 12.3% had become homeless recently after spending much of the prior 6 months housed. Half (49.7%) of participants made at least one ED visit in the past 6 months; 6.6% of participants accounted for 49.9% of all visits. Most (71.8%) identified a regular non-ED source of healthcare; 7.3% of visits resulted in hospitalization. In multivariate models, study participants who used multiple institutions (incidence rate ratio [IRR] = 2.27; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.08 to 4.77) and who were unsheltered (IRR = 2.29; 95% CI = 1.17 to 4.48) had higher ED use rates than participants who had been housed for most of the prior 6 months. In addition, having health insurance/coverage (IRR = 2.6; CI = 1.5 to 4.4), a history of psychiatric hospitalization (IRR = 1.80; 95% CI = 1.09 to 2.99), and severe pain (IRR = 1.72; 95% CI = 1.07 to 2.76) were associated with higher ED visit rates. CONCLUSIONS: A sample of adults aged 50 and older who were homeless at study entry had higher rates of ED use in the prior 6 months than the general U.S. age-matched population. Within the sample, ED use rates varied based on individuals' residential histories, suggesting that individuals' ED use is related to exposure to homelessness.
Authors: Rebecca T Brown; Yinghui Miao; Susan L Mitchell; Monica Bharel; Mitkumar Patel; Kevin L Ard; Laura J Grande; Deborah Blazey-Martin; Daniella Floru; Michael A Steinman Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2015-05-14 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Thomas M Atkinson; Barry D Rosenfeld; Laura Sit; Tito R Mendoza; Mike Fruscione; Dawn Lavene; Mary Shaw; Yuelin Li; Jennifer Hay; Charles S Cleeland; Howard I Scher; William S Breitbart; Ethan Basch Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2010-12-04 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: D Keith McInnes; Beth Ann Petrakis; Allen L Gifford; Sowmya R Rao; Thomas K Houston; Steven M Asch; Thomas P O'Toole Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2014-09 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Katherine A Koh; Melanie Racine; Jessie M Gaeta; John Goldie; Daniel P Martin; Barry Bock; Mary Takach; James J O'Connell; Zirui Song Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2020-02 Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Elise D Riley; Eric Vittinghoff; Rose M C Kagawa; Maria C Raven; Kellene V Eagen; Alison Cohee; Samantha E Dilworth; Martha Shumway Journal: J Urban Health Date: 2020-02 Impact factor: 3.671