Leah Fraimow-Wong1, Jennifer Sun2, Partow Imani3, Daniel Haro4, Harrison J Alter2,5. 1. University of California San Francisco, School of Medicine, San Francisco, California. 2. Highland Hospital - Alameda Health System, Department of Emergency Medicine, Oakland, California. 3. University of California Berkeley, School of Public Health, Berkeley, California. 4. New York University, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, New York, New York. 5. Andrew Levitt Center for Social Emergency Medicine, Berkeley, California.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Our objective was to determine the proportion of patients in our emergency department (ED) who are unhoused or marginally housed and when they typically present to the ED. METHODS: We surveyed patients in an urban, safety-net ED from June-August 2018, using a sampling strategy that met them at all times of day, every day of the week. Patients used two social needs screening tools with additional questions on housing during sampling shifts representing two full weeks. Housing status was determined using items validated for housing stability, including PRAPARE, the Accountable Health Communities Survey, and items from the United States Department of Health and Human Services. Propensity scores estimated differences among respondents and non-respondents. RESULTS: Of those surveyed, 35% (95% confidence interval [CI], 31-38) identified as homeless and 28% (95% CI, 25-31) as unstably housed. Respondents and non-respondents were similar by propensity score. The average cumulative number of homeless and unstably housed patients arriving per daily 8-hour window peaks at 7 AM, with 46% (95% CI, 29-64) of the daily aggregate of those reporting homelessness and 44% (95% CI, 24-64) with unstable housing presenting over the next eight hours. CONCLUSION: The ED represents a low-barrier contact point for reaching individuals experiencing housing challenges, who may interact rarely with other institutions. The current prevalence of homelessness and housing instability among urban ED patients may be substantially higher than reported in historical and national-level statistics. Housing services offered within normal business hours would reach a meaningful number of those who are unhoused or marginally housed.
INTRODUCTION: Our objective was to determine the proportion of patients in our emergency department (ED) who are unhoused or marginally housed and when they typically present to the ED. METHODS: We surveyed patients in an urban, safety-net ED from June-August 2018, using a sampling strategy that met them at all times of day, every day of the week. Patients used two social needs screening tools with additional questions on housing during sampling shifts representing two full weeks. Housing status was determined using items validated for housing stability, including PRAPARE, the Accountable Health Communities Survey, and items from the United States Department of Health and Human Services. Propensity scores estimated differences among respondents and non-respondents. RESULTS: Of those surveyed, 35% (95% confidence interval [CI], 31-38) identified as homeless and 28% (95% CI, 25-31) as unstably housed. Respondents and non-respondents were similar by propensity score. The average cumulative number of homeless and unstably housed patients arriving per daily 8-hour window peaks at 7 AM, with 46% (95% CI, 29-64) of the daily aggregate of those reporting homelessness and 44% (95% CI, 24-64) with unstable housing presenting over the next eight hours. CONCLUSION: The ED represents a low-barrier contact point for reaching individuals experiencing housing challenges, who may interact rarely with other institutions. The current prevalence of homelessness and housing instability among urban ED patients may be substantially higher than reported in historical and national-level statistics. Housing services offered within normal business hours would reach a meaningful number of those who are unhoused or marginally housed.
Authors: Evan Gerber; Lillian Gelberg; John Rotrosen; Donna Castelblanco; Tod Mijanovich; Kelly M Doran Journal: Subst Abus Date: 2019-08-01 Impact factor: 3.716
Authors: Maria C Raven; Lina Tieu; Christopher T Lee; Claudia Ponath; David Guzman; Margot Kushel Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2017-01 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Erik S Anderson; James W Galbraith; Laura J Deering; Sarah K Pfeil; Tamara Todorovic; Joel B Rodgers; Jordan M Forsythe; Ricardo Franco; Henry Wang; N Ewen Wang; Douglas A E White Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2017-06-01 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Dan Lewer; Robert W Aldridge; Dee Menezes; Clare Sawyer; Paola Zaninotto; Martin Dedicoat; Imtiaz Ahmed; Serena Luchenski; Andrew Hayward; Alistair Story Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2019-04-24 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Thomas Byrne; Mindy Hoang; Ann Elizabeth Montgomery; Eileen Johns; Marybeth Shinn; Tod Mijanovich; Dennis Culhane; Kelly M Doran Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2022-08-01