D Keith McInnes1, Beth Ann Petrakis, Allen L Gifford, Sowmya R Rao, Thomas K Houston, Steven M Asch, Thomas P O'Toole. 1. D. Keith McInnes, Beth Ann Petrakis, Allen L. Gifford, Sowmya R. Rao, and Thomas K. Houston are with the Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, Bedford VA Medical Center, Bedford, MA. Steven M. Asch is with VA Palo Alto Center for Innovation to Implementation, Palo Alto, CA. Thomas P. O'Toole is with the National Center on Homelessness among Veterans, Providence VA Medical Center, Providence, RI.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: We examined the feasibility of using mobile phone text messaging with homeless veterans to increase their engagement in care and reduce appointment no-shows. METHODS: We sent 2 text message reminders to participants (n = 20) before each of their outpatient appointments at an urban Veterans Affairs medical center. Evaluation included pre- and postsurvey questionnaires, open-ended questions, and review of medical records. We estimated costs and savings of large-scale implementation. RESULTS: Participants were satisfied with the text-messaging intervention, had very few technical difficulties, and were interested in continuing. Patient-cancelled visits and no-shows trended downward from 53 to 37 and from 31 to 25, respectively. Participants also experienced a statistically significant reduction in emergency department visits, from 15 to 5 (difference of 10; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.2, 17.8; P = .01), and a borderline significant reduction in hospitalizations, from 3 to 0 (difference of 3; 95% CI = -0.4, 6.4; P = .08). CONCLUSIONS: Text message reminders are a feasible means of reaching homeless veterans, and users consider it acceptable and useful. Implementation may reduce missed visits and emergency department use, and thus produce substantial cost savings.
OBJECTIVES: We examined the feasibility of using mobile phone text messaging with homeless veterans to increase their engagement in care and reduce appointment no-shows. METHODS: We sent 2 text message reminders to participants (n = 20) before each of their outpatient appointments at an urban Veterans Affairs medical center. Evaluation included pre- and postsurvey questionnaires, open-ended questions, and review of medical records. We estimated costs and savings of large-scale implementation. RESULTS:Participants were satisfied with the text-messaging intervention, had very few technical difficulties, and were interested in continuing. Patient-cancelled visits and no-shows trended downward from 53 to 37 and from 31 to 25, respectively. Participants also experienced a statistically significant reduction in emergency department visits, from 15 to 5 (difference of 10; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.2, 17.8; P = .01), and a borderline significant reduction in hospitalizations, from 3 to 0 (difference of 3; 95% CI = -0.4, 6.4; P = .08). CONCLUSIONS: Text message reminders are a feasible means of reaching homeless veterans, and users consider it acceptable and useful. Implementation may reduce missed visits and emergency department use, and thus produce substantial cost savings.
Authors: Thomas P O'Toole; Alicia Conde-Martel; Jeanette L Gibbon; Barbara H Hanusa; Michael J Fine Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2003-11 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Sheri D Weiser; Elise D Riley; Kathleen Ragland; Gwendolyn Hammer; Richard Clark; David R Bangsberg Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2006-01 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Leticia R Moczygemba; Lauren S Cox; Samantha A Marks; Margaret A Robinson; Jean-Venable R Goode; Nellie Jafari Journal: Int J Pharm Pract Date: 2016-11-29
Authors: Maria C Raven; Lina Tieu; Christopher T Lee; Claudia Ponath; David Guzman; Margot Kushel Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2017-01 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Sachin K Garg; Courtney R Lyles; Sara Ackerman; Margaret A Handley; Dean Schillinger; Gato Gourley; Veenu Aulakh; Urmimala Sarkar Journal: BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Date: 2016-02-06 Impact factor: 2.796
Authors: D Keith McInnes; Gemmae M Fix; Jeffrey L Solomon; Beth Ann Petrakis; Leon Sawh; David A Smelson Journal: PeerJ Date: 2015-07-30 Impact factor: 2.984