Literature DB >> 27517341

Exploring the basic science of prolapse meshes.

Rui Liang1, Katrina Knight, Steve Abramowitch, Pamela A Moalli.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Polypropylene mesh has been widely used in the surgical repair of pelvic organ prolapse. However, low but persistent rates of complications related to mesh, most commonly mesh exposure and pain, have hampered its use. Complications are higher following transvaginal implantation prompting the Food and Drug Administration to release two public health notifications warning of complications associated with transvaginal mesh use (PHN 2008 and 2011) and to upclassify transvaginal prolapse meshes from Class II to Class III devices. Although there have been numerous studies to determine the incidence and management of mesh complications as well as impact on quality of life, few studies have focused on mechanisms. RECENT
FINDINGS: In this review, we summarize the current understanding of how mesh textile properties and mechanical behavior impact vaginal structure and function, as well as the local immune response. We also discuss how mesh properties change in response to loading.
SUMMARY: We highlight a few areas of current and future research to emphasize collaborative strategies that incorporate basic science research to improve patient outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27517341      PMCID: PMC5161092          DOI: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000313

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 1040-872X            Impact factor:   1.927


  32 in total

Review 1.  Surgical management of anterior vaginal wall prolapse: an evidencebased literature review.

Authors:  Christopher Maher; Kaven Baessler
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2005-05-25

Review 2.  Mesh terminology 101.

Authors:  W S Cobb; R M Peindl; M Zerey; A M Carbonell; B T Heniford
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2008-09-16       Impact factor: 4.739

3.  Elongation of textile pelvic floor implants under load is related to complete loss of effective porosity, thereby favoring incorporation in scar plates.

Authors:  Jens Otto; E Kaldenhoff; R Kirschner-Hermanns; Thomas Mühl; Uwe Klinge
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 4.396

4.  Uniaxial biomechanical properties of seven different vaginally implanted meshes for pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Jonathan P Shepherd; Andrew J Feola; Steven D Abramowitch; Pamela A Moalli
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2011-11-26       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Deterioration in biomechanical properties of the vagina following implantation of a high-stiffness prolapse mesh.

Authors:  A Feola; S Abramowitch; Z Jallah; S Stein; W Barone; S Palcsey; P Moalli
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 6.531

6.  Polypropylene as a reinforcement in pelvic surgery is not inert: comparative analysis of 100 explants.

Authors:  Arnaud Clavé; Hannah Yahi; Jean-Claude Hammou; Suzelei Montanari; Pierre Gounon; Henri Clavé
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 2.894

7.  Characterization of the host inflammatory response following implantation of prolapse mesh in rhesus macaque.

Authors:  Bryan N Brown; Deepa Mani; Alexis L Nolfi; Rui Liang; Steven D Abramowitch; Pamela A Moalli
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Mesh implants in hernia repair. Inflammatory cell response in a rat model.

Authors:  R Rosch; K Junge; A Schachtrupp; U Klinge; B Klosterhalfen; V Schumpelick
Journal:  Eur Surg Res       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.745

9.  The age distribution, rates, and types of surgery for pelvic organ prolapse in the USA.

Authors:  Aparna D Shah; Neeraj Kohli; Sujatha S Rajan; Lennox Hoyte
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2007-09-20

10.  The impact of prolapse mesh on vaginal smooth muscle structure and function.

Authors:  Z Jallah; R Liang; A Feola; W Barone; S Palcsey; S D Abramowitch; N Yoshimura; P Moalli
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 6.531

View more
  11 in total

1.  Assessing pelvic organ prolapse recurrence after minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy: does mesh weight matter?

Authors:  Lauren E Giugale; Molly M Hansbarger; Amy L Askew; Anthony G Visco; Jonathan P Shepherd; Megan S Bradley
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Distinct macrophage populations and phenotypes associated with IL-4 mediated immunomodulation at the host implant interface.

Authors:  Daniel Hachim; Samuel T LoPresti; Rahul D Rege; Yuta Umeda; Aimon Iftikhar; Alexis L Nolfi; Clint D Skillen; Bryan N Brown
Journal:  Biomater Sci       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 6.843

Review 3.  Modern Theories of Pelvic Floor Support : A Topical Review of Modern Studies on Structural and Functional Pelvic Floor Support from Medical Imaging, Computational Modeling, and Electromyographic Perspectives.

Authors:  Yun Peng; Brandi D Miller; Timothy B Boone; Yingchun Zhang
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 4.  Host-biomaterial interactions in mesh complications after pelvic floor reconstructive surgery.

Authors:  Roxanna E Abhari; Matthew L Izett-Kay; Hayley L Morris; Rufus Cartwright; Sarah J B Snelling
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2021-09-20       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 5.  Mesh exposure following minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy: a narrative review.

Authors:  Stephanie Deblaere; Jan Hauspy; Karen Hansen
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 1.932

6.  Complications Reported to the Food and Drug Administration: A Cross-sectional Comparison of Urogynecologic Meshes.

Authors:  Amanda M Artsen; Jessica C Sassani; Pamela A Moalli; Megan S Bradley
Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 1.913

7.  A novel characterisation approach to reveal the mechano-chemical effects of oxidation and dynamic distension on polypropylene surgical mesh.

Authors:  Nicholas T H Farr; Sabiniano Roman; Jan Schäfer; Antje Quade; Daniel Lester; Vanessa Hearnden; Sheila MacNeil; Cornelia Rodenburg
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2021-10-27       Impact factor: 4.036

8.  Outcomes following sacrocolpopexy using ultralight and lightweight mesh.

Authors:  Mugdha Kulkarni; Daniel L Rolnik; James Alexander; Francesca McGannon; Yizhen Amy Liu; Anna Rosamilia
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 1.932

9.  Temporal Trends of Urogynecologic Mesh Reports to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

Authors:  Jessica C Sassani; Amanda M Artsen; Pamela A Moalli; Megan S Bradley
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 7.623

Review 10.  Role of Fibroblasts and Myofibroblasts on the Pathogenesis and Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse.

Authors:  Zeliha Guler; Jan Paul Roovers
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2022-01-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.