Tomasz Jakubczyk1,2, Valentin Delmonte1,2, Maciej Koperski3,4, Karol Nogajewski3, Clément Faugeras3, Wolfgang Langbein5, Marek Potemski3, Jacek Kasprzak1,2. 1. Univ. Grenoble Alpes , F-38000 Grenoble, France. 2. CNRS, Institut Néel , "Nanophysique et Semiconducteurs" group, F-38000 Grenoble, France. 3. Laboratoire National des Champs Magnétiques Intenses, CNRS-UGA-UPS-INSA-EMFL , 25 Av. des Martyrs, 38042 Grenoble, France. 4. Institute of Experimental Physics, Faculty of Physics, University of Warsaw , ul. Pasteura 5, 02-093 Warsaw, Poland. 5. Cardiff University School of Physics and Astronomy , The Parade, Cardiff CF24 3AA, United Kingdom.
Abstract
By implementing four-wave mixing (FWM) microspectroscopy, we measure coherence and population dynamics of the exciton transitions in monolayers of MoSe2. We reveal their dephasing times T2 and radiative lifetime T1 in a subpicosecond (ps) range, approaching T2 = 2T1 and thus indicating radiatively limited dephasing at a temperature of 6 K. We elucidate the dephasing mechanisms by varying the temperature and by probing various locations on the flake exhibiting a different local disorder. At the nanosecond range, we observe the residual FWM produced by the incoherent excitons, which initially disperse toward the dark states but then relax back to the optically active states within the light cone. By introducing polarization-resolved excitation, we infer intervalley exciton dynamics, revealing an initial polarization degree of around 30%, constant during the initial subpicosecond decay, followed by the depolarization on a picosecond time scale. The FWM hyperspectral imaging reveals the doped and undoped areas of the sample, allowing us to investigate the neutral exciton, the charged one, or both transitions at the same time. In the latter, we observe the exciton-trion beating in the coherence evolution indicating their coherent coupling.
By implementing four-wave mixing (FWM) microspectroscopy, we measure coherence and population dynamics of the exciton transitions in monolayers of MoSe2. We reveal their dephasing times T2 and radiative lifetime T1 in a subpicosecond (ps) range, approaching T2 = 2T1 and thus indicating radiatively limited dephasing at a temperature of 6 K. We elucidate the dephasing mechanisms by varying the temperature and by probing various locations on the flake exhibiting a different local disorder. At the nanosecond range, we observe the residual FWM produced by the incoherent excitons, which initially disperse toward the dark states but then relax back to the optically active states within the light cone. By introducing polarization-resolved excitation, we infer intervalley exciton dynamics, revealing an initial polarization degree of around 30%, constant during the initial subpicosecond decay, followed by the depolarization on a picosecond time scale. The FWM hyperspectral imaging reveals the doped and undoped areas of the sample, allowing us to investigate the neutral exciton, the charged one, or both transitions at the same time. In the latter, we observe the exciton-trion beating in the coherence evolution indicating their coherent coupling.
The identification of atomically
thin solids[1] resulted in the development
of the intriguing physics of graphene, followed by the emerging technological
applications.[2,3] Also, it stimulated a rapid progress
in fundamental studies of thin films extracted from other than graphite
layered materials, such as semiconducting transition metal dichalcogenides
(S-TMDs). The bandgap of S-TMDs converts from indirect to direct,
when reducing the material thickness to a single monolayer,[4] enabling exceptionally strong excitonic transitions.
Owing to the breakdown of out of plane translational symmetry for
two-dimensional systems, the coupling of excitons with light is boosted,[5] resulting in their short radiative lifetime and
thus increased oscillator strength μ. Excitons in S-TMD monolayers
display large binding energies EB of several
hundreds of meV[6−9]—an increase by 1–2 orders of magnitude with respect
to a typical semiconductor quantum well.[10,11] The observed excitonic absorption in S-TMDs reaches the values as
high as 10%,[12] illustrating an exceptionally
strong μ in these systems and implying a radiative lifetime
in the subpicosecond (subps) range,[13] as
recently observed in monolayers of WSe2[14,15] and other emerging two-dimensional systems, namely, nanoplatelets.[27] The robust coupling with light is attractive
in prospective applications, especially for photodetectors.[3] It is also appealing in optical fundamental studies,
for instance in polaritonics[16] and nonlinear
spectroscopy.[15,17,19]The large μ in S-TMDs gives rise to a giant nonlinear
optical response, which is investigated in this work via three-pulse
four-wave mixing (FWM) microspectroscopy. This approach offers a direct
access to the exciton coherence and population dynamics with a time
resolution limited only by the duration of the laser pulses, which
resonantly excite targeted optical transitions. Indeed, time-resolved
nonresonant photoluminescence measurements,[18] offer insufficient time-resolution to infer subps evolution and
involve complex relaxation pathways. Instead, resonant experiments,[15,19] also investigating internal transitions[14] occurring in the THz domain, have recently revealed ultrafast radiative
recombination of the exciton ground state in WSe2.In this work, we show that the optical dephasing time T2 of the neutral exciton transition (EX) in a monolayer
of MoSe2 is intrinsically limited by the EX ultrafast radiative
recombination T1. In contrast to previous
works inferring optical coherence in S-TMDs,[15,19] we take advantage of the microspectroscopy approach, employing the
laser beams focused down to the diffraction limited size of 0.7 μm
(full width at half-maximum, fwhm). Such implementation is used to
perform the FWM hyperspectral imaging,[20] which discriminates the exciton charge state across the sample and
helps to reveal the striking features of coherent coupling between
the neutral and charged excitons. We demonstrate that the EX linear
response inferred via microreflectance is affected by the inhomogeneous
broadening ξ also on a subμm scale, evidenced by the photon
echo formation in the FWM transients.[21] The analysis of the FWM delay dependence yields T2 ≃ 2T1, occurring
on a subps time scale. A spatially resolved study shows that T2 depends on the local disorder varying on a
subμm scale. From the temperature-dependent homogeneous line
width, we determine the dephasing due to phonon interaction. We also
monitor the density dynamics of excitons, which is governed by the
interplay between bright states within the light cone and various
available dark states.
Sample and Experiment
The investigated
MoSe2 monolayerw were fabricated by means of polydimethylsiloxane-based
exfoliation of bulk crystals, purchased from HQ Graphene, and transferred
onto a Si/SiO2 substrate. Relatively large monolayer flakes
of up to (50 × 50) μm2 size have been obtained
and placed in an optical He-flow cryostat.To infer both the
coherence and the population dynamics of excitons, we retrieved their
FWM by implementing a three-beam configuration[20] of the heterodyne spectral interferometry.[21] This technique has been proven as an efficient detection
scheme of optical nonlinearities in a solid, until now only employed
to retrieve wave mixing signals generated by individual transitions
in semiconductor quantum dots.[20,21,25] FWM is an optical polarization created with short, resonant driving
pulses; , and , as depicted in Figure a. In the third-order (χ(3)) regime its amplitude is proportional to . Thus, owing to a large μ,
a dramatic enhancement of FWM is expected in MoSe2 monolayers.
Note that the * stands for the complex conjugate, which is the origin
of the FWM rephasing in inhomogeneously broadened systems,[21] generating the photon echo (as also sketched
in Figure a), which
acts as a probe of the microscopic dephasing.
Figure 1
Four-wave mixing spectroscopy
of the MoSe2 monolayer. (a) Pulse sequence employed in
FWM experiments and related observables. (b) FWM spectral interferogram
obtained on the flake position displaying the exciton (EX) and trion
(TR) transitions. (c) FWM intensity (black) retrieved from (b) via
spectral interferometry. is shown with
a blue line. (d) Spectrally integrated FWM intensity of EX as a function
of intensity, showing the driving
range yielding the χ(3) regime of the FWM.
Four-wave mixing spectroscopy
of the MoSe2 monolayer. (a) Pulse sequence employed in
FWM experiments and related observables. (b) FWM spectral interferogram
obtained on the flake position displaying the exciton (EX) and trion
(TR) transitions. (c) FWM intensity (black) retrieved from (b) via
spectral interferometry. is shown with
a blue line. (d) Spectrally integrated FWM intensity of EX as a function
of intensity, showing the driving
range yielding the χ(3) regime of the FWM.Micro-FWM spectroscopy requires
the colinear arrangement of the driving fields , which is enabled by
phase-selecting the signal through optical heterodyning.[21] By employing acousto-optic modulation, are frequency up-shifted by radio-frequencies,
introducing controlled phase-drifts in their respective pulse trains
generated by a Ti:sapphire femtosecond laser. After acquiring the
delays τ12 and τ23, introduced by
a pair of mechanical delay lines, are recombined into a
common spatial mode and are focused on the sample with the microscope
objective. The reference beam , used in the
heterodyne mixing and interferometric detection, is also focused at
the sample, yet is vertically displaced with respect to by around 12 μm.The time-ordering
of the pulses is presented on Figure a: measuring time-integrated FWM detected at the Ω3 + Ω2 – Ω1 heterodyne
frequency, as a function of τ12 (τ23), yields the coherence (population) dynamics of an optical transition.
The FWM signal is measured in reflectance, attaining a shot-noise
detection limit and rejecting the resonant driving fields with 106 (1012) selectivity
in field (intensity). The interference between the heterodyned signal
and is spectrally
resolved with an imaging spectrometer. Further details regarding the
current experimental implementation are given in ref (20).In Figure b we present a typical spectral
interference between and the FWM
at a temperature T = 5 K for τ12 = 0. The FWM intensity is retrieved by spectral interferometry and
shown in Figure c.
The signal consists of two transitions identified as the ground state–exciton
(EX) and the single electron–trion transitions (TR).[22] In Figure d we present the FWM intensity of EX as a function
of intensity demonstrating a linear
dependence in the χ(3) regime, as expected. Note
that the FWM can be driven with a intensity
as low as a few tens of nW, corresponding to a few hundreds of photons
per pulse and generating a low carrier density,
less than 109/cm2. Such density is far below
the saturation density[23] estimated at around
1013/cm2. In our study, we therefore consider
the creation of excitons with K ∼ 0 center
of mass momentum, which appear at the K+ and K–, points of the Brillouin zone of the S-TMD crystal.
Those excitons can either decay radiatively or disperse out of the
light cone (K > nω/c) via phonon scattering. The latter process occupies dark
exciton states, which relax back to K < nω/c on a pico-second time scale
and eventually recombine. Further relaxation pathways are scattering
electrons and holes between the K-points.
Hyperspectral Imaging
An image of the studied MoSe2 monolayer is shown in Figure and in the Table
of Contents graphics. The microspectroscopy approach enables to perform
FWM hyperspectral imaging,[20,25] allowing us to identify
regions of the flake dominated by the FWM of EX or TR (see Figure b and c). Clearly,
the two images are complementary, which permits to distinguish regions
of different resident carrier concentration. In the following experiments,
the performed imaging allowed us to selectively address EX or TR or
to drive simultaneously both transitions.
Figure 2
Hyperspectral mapping
of the MoSe2 monolayer. (a) Optical contrast of the sample
observed in reflectance. Red dots indicate and . (b–c) Spatial imaging of the FWM amplitude, spectrally averaged
over the exciton (b) response, centered at ∼1650 meV and the
trion (c) at ∼1625 meV. Heterodyning at the FWM frequency Ω3 + Ω2 – Ω1 with τ12 = τ23 = 50 fs, T = 6 K.
(d) Top: A typical PL spectrum, nonresonantly excited at ∼1750
meV (∼710 nm) with ≃0.1 μW average power arriving
at the sample surface, displaying bright emission from EX and TR,
with integrated count rate of 350 kHz for each transition. Bottom:
Correlation between the PL intensity of the TR (black) and its binding
energy (green), as a function of its transition energy. (e–f)
PL imaging of TR and EX, respectively. Excitation conditions as in
d. Linear color scale, as shown by horizontal bars.
Hyperspectral mapping
of the MoSe2 monolayer. (a) Optical contrast of the sample
observed in reflectance. Red dots indicate and . (b–c) Spatial imaging of the FWM amplitude, spectrally averaged
over the exciton (b) response, centered at ∼1650 meV and the
trion (c) at ∼1625 meV. Heterodyning at the FWM frequency Ω3 + Ω2 – Ω1 with τ12 = τ23 = 50 fs, T = 6 K.
(d) Top: A typical PL spectrum, nonresonantly excited at ∼1750
meV (∼710 nm) with ≃0.1 μW average power arriving
at the sample surface, displaying bright emission from EX and TR,
with integrated count rate of 350 kHz for each transition. Bottom:
Correlation between the PL intensity of the TR (black) and its binding
energy (green), as a function of its transition energy. (e–f)
PL imaging of TR and EX, respectively. Excitation conditions as in
d. Linear color scale, as shown by horizontal bars.Performing microspectroscopy also permits to locally
address subμm regions of smaller spectral inhomogeneous broadening
with respect to the total area of the flake. To exemplify this, we
have performed a statistical analysis of the microphotoluminescence
(PL) hyperspectral imaging. Similarly as in Figure c, confocally detected PL spectra yield
EX and TR transitions, as displayed at the top of Figure d. We observe particularly
bright emission, with a photon flux per second of 108–109, indicating a high quantum yield.For every spatial
position, we have determined the integrated intensity for both transitions
and their center energies. For the latter, we observe the spread over
ξ ≃ 10 meV, as displayed at the bottom of Figure d. Interestingly, despite
this large, macroscopic ξ, the trion binding energy Δ
remains well-defined, Δ = (28.8 ± 0.3) meV. We note that
the lower the TR transition energy, the higher its intensity is measured.
In our understanding this reflects the distribution of residual electrons
in the sample. Interestingly, however, such correlation is not observed
for EX, i.e., the EX intensity is not sensitive to the apparent changes
in the charge density in our sample.In Figure e and f we present the PL imaging spectrally
integrated over EX and TR transition, respectively. By comparing it
with Figure b and
c, we point out two advantages of our original FWM imaging with respect
to the routinely performed PL one. First, owing to the third-power
scaling of the FWM intensity with the excitation power, combined with
heterodyning with , the spatial
resolution in the FWM imaging is enhanced[26] up to 0.3λ/NA ≈ 360 nm, surmounting the standard diffraction
limit by a factor of 2. Second, the FWM yields a significantly improved
imaging selectivity of EX and TR across the flake. In fact, different
properties are inferred in both experiments. The FWM directly probes
μ of the resonantly generated excitons at the K-points of the
valleys. Instead, the nonresonant PL reflects more complex carrier
relaxation along the valleys toward their K-points, prior to the exciton
formation, followed by their radiative recombination.
Coherence Dynamics
The strength of the FWM spectroscopy in assessing the coherence
in solids lies in its capability to separate homogeneous (γ)
and inhomogeneous (ξ) contributions of the transition’s
spectral width. In particular, in a presence of ξ, the time-resolved
FWM amplitude exhibits a photon echo,[15,27] which decays
as exp(−2τ12/T2). Hence, to investigate the exciton coherence dynamics, we measured
FWM as a function of τ12. Time-resolved FWM amplitude
of the EX transition, displayed in Figure a, clearly demonstrates formation of the
photon echo. From its temporal width we estimate the local ξ
to be in a few meV range. Figure b shows the time-integrated FWM as a function of τ12. The data are modeled by a convolution of a Gaussian profile
with an exponential decay. The former exhibits the fwhm width of 0.15
ps, reflecting duration of impinging the sample. Instead, from the
latter we retrieve at T = 6 K the dephasing time T2 = 2ℏ/γ = 620 ± 20 fs, and
thus γ ≃ 2.1 meV (fwhm). For simplicity, the dynamics
owing to the echo formation process close to zero delay has been here
disregarded. The homogeneous broadening γ is around twice smaller
than the transition line width directly measured via microreflectivity,
as shown in the inset of Figure b and also in FWM (see Figure c). We thus conclude that the line-shape
remains affected by the inhomogeneous broadening ξ, even though
a subμm area is probed.
Figure 3
Exciton dynamics in the MoSe2 monolayer
inferred with FWM microscopy. (a) Time-resolved FWM amplitude as a
function of τ12, showing the formation of a photon
echo: a Gaussian signal with a maximum for t = τ12. Logarithmic color scale is given by the color bar. (b)
FWM amplitude as a function of τ12 retrieved from
the EX at T = 6, 45, and 300 K given by black circles,
purple squares, and green triangles, respectively. The simulations
yielding T2 ≃ 620 and 520 fs are
given by red traces. Inset: reflectance measured at T = 6 K yielding 4.1 meV fwhm. (c) Cartoon of the considered radiative
recombination and intravalley relaxation processes is presented in
the inset. The initial dynamics of the EX population measured at 5,
45, and 300 K, color coding as in b. The results yield radiative lifetime T1 and relaxation time Tintra (see main text). (d) τ12 dependence
of the FWM amplitude when simultaneously driving the EX (blue) and
TR (brown) transitions, revealing a beating with 140 fs period, and
thus indicating EX–TR coherent coupling. The location of the
excitation is marked with a cross in Figure b, while the corresponding microreflectance
spectrum is given in the inset.
Exciton dynamics in the MoSe2 monolayer
inferred with FWM microscopy. (a) Time-resolved FWM amplitude as a
function of τ12, showing the formation of a photon
echo: a Gaussian signal with a maximum for t = τ12. Logarithmic color scale is given by the color bar. (b)
FWM amplitude as a function of τ12 retrieved from
the EX at T = 6, 45, and 300 K given by black circles,
purple squares, and green triangles, respectively. The simulations
yielding T2 ≃ 620 and 520 fs are
given by red traces. Inset: reflectance measured at T = 6 K yielding 4.1 meV fwhm. (c) Cartoon of the considered radiative
recombination and intravalley relaxation processes is presented in
the inset. The initial dynamics of the EX population measured at 5,
45, and 300 K, color coding as in b. The results yield radiative lifetime T1 and relaxation time Tintra (see main text). (d) τ12 dependence
of the FWM amplitude when simultaneously driving the EX (blue) and
TR (brown) transitions, revealing a beating with 140 fs period, and
thus indicating EX–TR coherent coupling. The location of the
excitation is marked with a cross in Figure b, while the corresponding microreflectance
spectrum is given in the inset.With increasing temperature, T2 is expected to decrease,[15] owing to phonon
scattering. This is highlighted in Figure b. At T = 45 K the dephasing
accelerates, and we measure T2 = 520 ±
40 fs. At ambient temperature the dephasing occurs at a time scale
faster than 100 fs and is not resolved by our setup, although a pronounced
FWM is still measured. We note that for the TR transition at T = 6 K we find T2 = (460 ±
30) fs and similar inhomogeneous broadening as for EX, also generating
a photon echo as in Figure c (not shown). This shorter dephasing of the charged exciton
is tentatively interpreted in terms of the final state damping, due
to the energy distribution of final state energies of the leftover
electron.In Figure c we present the coherence dynamics measured at the boundary
of the doped and undoped regions of the flake, marked with a cross
in Figure d, such
that the FWM of both EX and TR is driven in tandem. We observe a beating,
withstanding on both transitions during initial positive delays τ12, up to around 700 fs when the TR coherence virtually vanishes.
The beating period of ζ = 140 fs (marked with a pair of vertical
lines), well corresponds to the EX–TR binding energy Δ
= 2πℏ/ζ ≃ 29 meV and thus indicates their
coherent coupling.[28,29]To gain a deeper understanding
of the exciton ultrafast dynamics, we have combined the enhanced spatial
and temporal resolution of our experiment and we have performed spatially
resolved dephasing study at T = 6 K. Within an area
of 8 μm × 8 μm, displaying uniquely the EX transition,
we have scanned the coherence dynamics with a spatial step of 0.66
μm. The analysis of the obtained statistics of dephasing, reveals
variations of T2 within the probed area
from around 0.5 ps up to 1.5 ps. Interestingly, the locations on the
flake yielding the shortest T2 also display
the broadest photon echo, and thus the smallest ξ. Conversely,
the longest T2 is measured on the areas
characterized by a larger ξ, and thus showing the narrowest
photon echo, here limited by the temporal duration of the laser pulses.
An example of such two representative cases is displayed in Figure a and b. The spatially
resolved dephasing experiment indicates that T2 is governed by a local disorder, realizing various localization
potentials. The resulting spatially dependent coherence volume of
EX has a direct impact on its radiative lifetime T1: the fastest recombination is expected at the areas
of the smallest ξ, as indeed measured.
Figure 4
Impact of a local disorder
and temperature on the exciton dephasing in the MoSe2 monolayer.
(a) Time-resolved FWM amplitude, measured on the location displaying
a larger ξ, showing a temporarily narrowed photon echo. The
observed increased dephasing time with respect to Figure attributed to a localization
induced increase of the radiative lifetime T1. (b) As in panel a but measured on the area showing a broader
echo and thus smaller ξ. A weaker localization yields a shorter T1 = T2/2 than in
panel a. Logarithmic color scale over 2 orders of magnitude. (c) FWM
amplitude dynamics as a function of temperature measured on the area
as in a. Above T = 125 K the dephasing is faster
than the temporal resolution of the experiment. The temperature-dependent
homogeneous broadening γ = 2ℏ/T2 (inset) indicates the phonon-induced dephasing mechanism.
For clarity, the fits are not shown.
Impact of a local disorder
and temperature on the exciton dephasing in the MoSe2 monolayer.
(a) Time-resolved FWM amplitude, measured on the location displaying
a larger ξ, showing a temporarily narrowed photon echo. The
observed increased dephasing time with respect to Figure attributed to a localization
induced increase of the radiative lifetime T1. (b) As in panel a but measured on the area showing a broader
echo and thus smaller ξ. A weaker localization yields a shorter T1 = T2/2 than in
panel a. Logarithmic color scale over 2 orders of magnitude. (c) FWM
amplitude dynamics as a function of temperature measured on the area
as in a. Above T = 125 K the dephasing is faster
than the temporal resolution of the experiment. The temperature-dependent
homogeneous broadening γ = 2ℏ/T2 (inset) indicates the phonon-induced dephasing mechanism.
For clarity, the fits are not shown.In Figure c we present the coherence dynamics on the chosen area exhibiting
an increased T2, measured from 6 to 150
K. The data clearly show a gradual decrease of T2 with temperature from 1.4 to 0.2 ps, respectively, adding
to the measurements shown in Figure b. The retrieved γ = 2ℏ/T2 is plotted in the inset. It can be modeled with a linear
dependence and an additional bosonic term:[41] γ(T) = γ0 + aT + b/(exp(E1/kBT) – 1). The linear
term (γ0 = 0.78 ± 0.11 meV, a = 0.03 ± 0.003 meV/K) is due to low energy acoustic phonons.
The latter term, with the energy E1 =
43 ± 4 meV and b = 187 ± 75 meV, could
be attributed to thermal activation of higher energy optical phonons.[41] The phonon dephasing mechanisms are therefore
similar as in semiconductor quantum wells.
Population Dynamics
In the following, the FWM is employed to infer the EX population
dynamics after their resonant and selective excitation in a given
valley ( and , denoted
as , are cocircularly polarized). They arrive at the flake with virtually
no delay generating exciton population. Owing to the large μ,
the excitons exhibit fast radiative decay. Nevertheless, they still
experience scattering[24] for instance induced
by defects, disorder and phonons, which can efficiently redistribute
them out of the light cone (marked with dashed lines in the inset
of Figure c), toward K > nω/c. This
type of scattering is particularly efficient in S-TMDs: due to heavy
masses (and thus flat bands at the bottom of the branches) and large
γ, the excitons’ center of mass scatter out of the light
cone at practically no cost in energy. As a result, the major part
of the created population instantly decays with its radiative lifetime T1, while the remaining part spreads along the
dispersion branch populating dark states (i.e., outside the light
cone). Also a part of these excited excitons eventually relax toward
the bottom of the valley with a characteristic time Tintra and recombine radiatively, as depicted in Figure c. In the dynamics
probed with FWM, we disregard the influence of strongly localized,
quantum-dot like states, due to their small density and we disregard
nonradiative Auger processes,[14] as we operate
at low exciton densities.The FWM therefore probes all the above-mentioned
processes via τ23 dependence. This is shown in Figure c, for the EX (obtained
the same spatial position as in Figure b) for driving upon cocircular polarization of . The data are modeled with a double exponential
decay convoluted with the Gaussian laser pulse, showing temporal width
of 0.16 ps (fwhm). From the initial decay we retrieve the exciton
lifetime of T1 = 390 ± 20 fs, while
the FWM for further delays τ23 yields the intravalley
relaxation time of Tintra = 4.3 ±
0.6 ps. At T = 45 K we measure instead T1, Tintra = 0.42 ± 0.01,
6.84 ± 0.38 ps. An increase of Tintra with temperature is attributed to Boltzmann distribution of excitons,
allowing for reaching higher energies and K-vectors
out of the light cone, and also to access different dark states offered
by the structure of the valley excitons.A physical picture
arising from the FWM experiment at low temperature is that the initial
exciton decay with the time T1, covering
an order of magnitude in amplitude (see Figure c), is due to the radiative recombination,
while the nonradiative processes are of minor impact, as they are
not faster than the Tintra (we assume
they have the same dynamics for both bright and dark excitons). Importantly,
comparing the T1 with T2 times, we conclude that the dephasing is principally
due to the radiative decay, nearing to the radiative limit. Observation
of the radiatively limited dephasing is a prerequisite for implementing
more advanced optical coherent control schemes in S-TMDs.We
point out that the dynamics of the secondary, incoherent excitons—here
probed by τ23 dependence of FWM—is particularly
complex and might be influenced by a set of unconventional features
present in S-TMDs. One should bear in mind coupling with and scattering
toward counter-polarized K-valleys and spin-split
bands, relevant in formation of exciton complexes. In fact, triple
degeneracy of the K-valleys, enables various configurations
for bright and dark exciton states, as previously considered for other
systems hosting multiexcitons.[30,31] We also point out exotic
dispersion relations for the center-of-mass momentum.[32] Thus, we refrain from firm interpretation and first-principle
modeling of the secondary exciton dynamics, displayed in Figure on a 100 ps time
scale.
Figure 5
Intervalley population dynamics in the MoSe2 monolayers
investigated with the polarization-resolved driving of the FWM. Bottom:
FWM amplitude versus τ23 of the EX transition obtained
at T = 6 K upon co- (green trace) and cross-circular
(blue trace) setting of . The modeling, as in Figure c, is displayed as red lines. Equivalent dynamics have been
measured (not shown) for a counter-polarized driving (σ+ →
σ−). Inset: Rationale of the intervalley dynamics probed
with FWM using polarization-resolved driving: induces
the FWM signal in a given valley, which originates from the population
generated in the counter- or copolarized valley, by setting counter-
or cocircular , respectively. Top: τ23 delay dependence of the
measured circular polarization degree, ρ(τ23). We measure ρ(τ23) of several tens of percent
for initial delays τ23, followed by a total depolarization
of the FWM, generated by the secondary exciton population (see the
main text).
Intervalley population dynamics in the MoSe2 monolayers
investigated with the polarization-resolved driving of the FWM. Bottom:
FWM amplitude versus τ23 of the EX transition obtained
at T = 6 K upon co- (green trace) and cross-circular
(blue trace) setting of . The modeling, as in Figure c, is displayed as red lines. Equivalent dynamics have been
measured (not shown) for a counter-polarized driving (σ+ →
σ−). Inset: Rationale of the intervalley dynamics probed
with FWM using polarization-resolved driving: induces
the FWM signal in a given valley, which originates from the population
generated in the counter- or copolarized valley, by setting counter-
or cocircular , respectively. Top: τ23 delay dependence of the
measured circular polarization degree, ρ(τ23). We measure ρ(τ23) of several tens of percent
for initial delays τ23, followed by a total depolarization
of the FWM, generated by the secondary exciton population (see the
main text).
Intervalley Dynamics
Below, we present the FWM results obtained upon polarization-resolved
driving, employed to investigate exciton scattering between counter-polarized
valleys, and thus testing the robustness of the pseudospin degree
of freedom. The reciprocal space of TMD monolayers displays nonequivalent
bands with the extrema at K-points,[33−35] labeled as K+ and K–. The dipole-allowed transitions in these two
valleys can be selectively addressed by circularly polarized light,
σ+ and σ–, respectively.
The light helicity is therefore considered as an asset to drive, manipulate,
and read the state of the valley subspaces. The valley polarization,[34] although protected by the strong spin–orbit
splitting in the valence band, decays mainly due to the to electron–hole
exchange interaction.[36,37] Since the stability of this degree
of freedom is required in prospective applications of TMDs, intense
efforts are currently devoted to study its dynamics and to reveal
the mechanisms that govern it,[38] in particular
in a presence of spin-forbidden transitions.[12,39,40,42−44]To infer the exciton intervalley
dynamics, we implemented polarization-resolved excitation of the FWM
signal. Specifically, and are set as cocircular. Instead, the circular polarization of is opposite, such that FWM probes the conversion of the exciton
population between K+ and K–
valleys,[35] as depicted in Figure . Instead, to probe the exciton
dynamics in the same valley, we set the cocircular polarization of and . The measurement is presented
in Figure (bottom).
As in Figure c, we
observe an initial fast decay of the radiatively recombining excitons
within the first picoseconds and subsequent recombination of the secondary
excitons. The early dynamics for both polarization configuration is
not the same during initial several picoseconds of τ23. Instead, for longer delays, τ23 > 10 ps, the
measured FWM (generated by the secondary excitons) is the same for
both driving configurations.We calculate the FWM circular polarization
degree, which we define as , where R denotes
the spectral FWM amplitude. The resulting ρ(τ23) is plotted at the top of Figure . We thus do observe a significant pseudospin polarization
around zero delay, ρ(τ23) ≃ 0) ≃
30%, which however vanishes extremely rapidly, within around 5 ps,
such that ρ(τ23) = 0 for τ23 > 10 ps. We therefore show that under resonant excitation it
is possible to generate valley-polarized excitons in MoSe2 monolayers, but confirm their rapid depolarization. This result
brings new input toward a firm understanding of an intriguingly weak
efficiency of optical pumping in MoSe2 monolayers, as opposed
to other S-TMDs.[45] The circular polarization
degree, relevant for valleytronics applications, could be stabilized
by using magnetic fields[38] or by fabricating
more involved heterostructures[46,47] based on S-TMDs.When analyzing Figure it is worth noting a large fraction of the FWM response within initial
several picoseconds for both polarization configurations, as compared
to the subsequent dynamics. This shows that the exciton density is
mainly removed radiatively within the subps radiative lifetime T1, as discussed before.
Conclusions
By
performing FWM spectroscopy, we have demonstrated a giant, optical,
coherent, nonlinear response of exciton transitions in MoSe2 monolayers. We find an increase in the FWM amplitude by 2 orders
of magnitude, as compared to a high-quality CdTe semiconductor quantum
well (not shown), emitting at the similar wavelength and excitation
power. Taking advantage of the microscopy approach, we have performed
the hyperspectral imaging, which allowed us to accurately determine
the areas yielding FWM responses of either neutral or charged excitons,
or both. Electrical gating of such structures could enable spectral
control of coherent responses from TMDs, providing insights into the
mutual influence of TR and EX onto their dynamics. Using two-beam
FWM microspectroscopy, we have measured the excitons’ coherence
evolution, accessing dephasing times T2, which turn out to be intrinsically limited by the radiative lifetime.
The inhomogeneous broadening on a subμm range is reduced by
an order of magnitude with respect to the size of the flake, although
still gives rise to the photon echo. We have also shown that T2 spatially varies across the flake, as the T1 is governed by the local disorder, determining
the exciton localization. Microscopic measurement of the FWM response
is therefore required to accurately assess these parameters. Prospective
experiments, exploiting two-dimensional FWM spectroscopy, will ascertain
coupling mechanisms between exotic valley–exciton species offered
by S-TMDs. Our approach could be used to retrieve coherent responses
of the localized exciton states in S-TMDs,[48] which are expected to exhibit ultralong dephasing.[49] Finally, by exploiting polarization-resolved, three-beam
FWM we assessed the exciton population dynamics, revealing the interplay
between the subps radiative decay T1 and
the intravalley relaxation Tintra of the
excitons scattered toward the dark states, revisiting the light–matter
coupling in two-dimensional systems.[5]
Authors: K S Novoselov; A K Geim; S V Morozov; D Jiang; Y Zhang; S V Dubonos; I V Grigorieva; A A Firsov Journal: Science Date: 2004-10-22 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Aaron M Jones; Hongyi Yu; Nirmal J Ghimire; Sanfeng Wu; Grant Aivazian; Jason S Ross; Bo Zhao; Jiaqiang Yan; David G Mandrus; Di Xiao; Wang Yao; Xiaodong Xu Journal: Nat Nanotechnol Date: 2013-08-11 Impact factor: 39.213
Authors: Pasqual Rivera; John R Schaibley; Aaron M Jones; Jason S Ross; Sanfeng Wu; Grant Aivazian; Philip Klement; Kyle Seyler; Genevieve Clark; Nirmal J Ghimire; Jiaqiang Yan; D G Mandrus; Wang Yao; Xiaodong Xu Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2015-02-24 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: John R Schaibley; Todd Karin; Hongyi Yu; Jason S Ross; Pasqual Rivera; Aaron M Jones; Marie E Scott; Jiaqiang Yan; D G Mandrus; Wang Yao; Kai-Mei Fu; Xiaodong Xu Journal: Phys Rev Lett Date: 2015-04-01 Impact factor: 9.161
Authors: Jakob Wierzbowski; Julian Klein; Florian Sigger; Christian Straubinger; Malte Kremser; Takashi Taniguchi; Kenji Watanabe; Ursula Wurstbauer; Alexander W Holleitner; Michael Kaniber; Kai Müller; Jonathan J Finley Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2017-09-28 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Mengyao Li; Ivan Sinev; Fedor Benimetskiy; Tatyana Ivanova; Ekaterina Khestanova; Svetlana Kiriushechkina; Anton Vakulenko; Sriram Guddala; Maurice Skolnick; Vinod M Menon; Dmitry Krizhanovskii; Andrea Alù; Anton Samusev; Alexander B Khanikaev Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2021-07-20 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Christian Schneider; Mikhail M Glazov; Tobias Korn; Sven Höfling; Bernhard Urbaszek Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2018-07-12 Impact factor: 14.919