Hanwen Zhang1, Pooja Desai1, Yusuke Koike1,2, Jacob Houghton1, Sean Carlin1, Nidhi Tandon1, Karim Touijer2, Wolfgang A Weber3,4. 1. Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. 2. Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; and. 3. Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York weberw@mskcc.org. 4. Molecular Pharmacology and Chemistry Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Abstract
Gastrin-releasing peptide (GRP) receptors (GRPr) are frequently overexpressed in human prostate cancer, and radiolabeled GRPr affinity ligands have shown promise for in vivo imaging of prostate cancer with PET. The goal of this study was to develop a dual-modality imaging probe that can be used for noninvasive PET imaging and optical imaging of prostate cancer. METHODS: We designed and synthesized an IRDye 650 and DOTA-conjugated GRPr antagonist, HZ220 (DOTA-Lys(IRDye 650)-PEG4-[D-Phe6, Sta13]-BN(6-14)NH2), by reacting DOTA-Lys-PEG4-[D-Phe6, Sta13]-BN(6-14)NH2 (HZ219) with IRDye 650 N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS) ester. Receptor-specific binding of gallium-labeled HZ220 was characterized in PC-3 prostate cancer cells (PC-3), and tumor uptake in mice was imaged with PET/CT and fluorescence imaging. Receptor binding affinity, in vivo tumor uptake, and biodistribution were compared with the GRPr antagonists HZ219, DOTA-PEG4-[D-Phe6, Sta13]-BN(6-14)NH2 (DOTA-AR), and DOTA-(4-amino-1-carboxymethyl-piperidine)-[D-Phe6, Sta13]-BN(6-14)NH2 (DOTA-RM2). RESULTS: After hydrophilic-lipophilic balance cartridge purification, 68Ga-HZ220 was obtained with a radiochemical yield of 56% ± 8% (non-decay-corrected), and the radiochemical purity was greater than 95%. Ga-HZ220 had a lower affinity for GRPr (inhibitory concentration of 50% [IC50], 21.4 ± 7.4 nM) than Ga-DOTA-AR (IC50, 0.48 ± 0.18 nM) or Ga-HZ219 (IC50, 0.69 ± 0.18 nM). Nevertheless, 68Ga-HZ220 had an in vivo tumor accumulation similar to 68Ga-DOTA-AR (4.63 ± 0.31 vs. 4.07 ± 0.29 percentage injected activity per mL [%IA/mL] at 1 h after injection) but lower than that of 68Ga-DOTA-RM2 (10.4 ± 0.4 %IA/mL). The tumor uptake of 68Ga-HZ220 was blocked significantly with an excessive amount of GRP antagonists. IVIS spectrum imaging also visualized PC-3 xenografts in vivo and ex vivo with a high-contrast ratio. Autoradiography and fluorescent-based microscopic imaging with 68Ga-HZ220 consistently colocated the expression of GRPr. 68Ga-HZ220 displayed a higher kidney uptake than both 68Ga-DOTA-AR and 68Ga-DOTA-RM2 (16.9 ± 6.5 vs. 4.48 ± 1.63 vs. 5.01 ± 2.29 %IA/mL). CONCLUSION: 68Ga-HZ220 is a promising bimodal ligand for noninvasive PET imaging and intraoperative optical imaging of GRPr-expressing malignancies. Bimodal nuclear/fluorescence imaging may not only improve cancer detection and guide surgical resections, but also improve our understanding of the uptake of GRPr ligands on the cellular level.
Gastrin-releasing peptide (GRP) receptors (GRPr) are frequently overexpressed in humanprostate cancer, and radiolabeled GRPr affinity ligands have shown promise for in vivo imaging of prostate cancer with PET. The goal of this study was to develop a dual-modality imaging probe that can be used for noninvasive PET imaging and optical imaging of prostate cancer. METHODS: We designed and synthesized an IRDye 650 and DOTA-conjugated GRPr antagonist, HZ220 (DOTA-Lys(IRDye 650)-PEG4-[D-Phe6, Sta13]-BN(6-14)NH2), by reacting DOTA-Lys-PEG4-[D-Phe6, Sta13]-BN(6-14)NH2 (HZ219) with IRDye 650 N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS) ester. Receptor-specific binding of gallium-labeled HZ220 was characterized in PC-3 prostate cancer cells (PC-3), and tumor uptake in mice was imaged with PET/CT and fluorescence imaging. Receptor binding affinity, in vivo tumor uptake, and biodistribution were compared with the GRPr antagonists HZ219, DOTA-PEG4-[D-Phe6, Sta13]-BN(6-14)NH2 (DOTA-AR), and DOTA-(4-amino-1-carboxymethyl-piperidine)-[D-Phe6, Sta13]-BN(6-14)NH2 (DOTA-RM2). RESULTS: After hydrophilic-lipophilic balance cartridge purification, 68Ga-HZ220 was obtained with a radiochemical yield of 56% ± 8% (non-decay-corrected), and the radiochemical purity was greater than 95%. Ga-HZ220 had a lower affinity for GRPr (inhibitory concentration of 50% [IC50], 21.4 ± 7.4 nM) than Ga-DOTA-AR (IC50, 0.48 ± 0.18 nM) or Ga-HZ219 (IC50, 0.69 ± 0.18 nM). Nevertheless, 68Ga-HZ220 had an in vivo tumor accumulation similar to 68Ga-DOTA-AR (4.63 ± 0.31 vs. 4.07 ± 0.29 percentage injected activity per mL [%IA/mL] at 1 h after injection) but lower than that of 68Ga-DOTA-RM2 (10.4 ± 0.4 %IA/mL). The tumor uptake of 68Ga-HZ220 was blocked significantly with an excessive amount of GRP antagonists. IVIS spectrum imaging also visualized PC-3 xenografts in vivo and ex vivo with a high-contrast ratio. Autoradiography and fluorescent-based microscopic imaging with 68Ga-HZ220 consistently colocated the expression of GRPr. 68Ga-HZ220 displayed a higher kidney uptake than both 68Ga-DOTA-AR and 68Ga-DOTA-RM2 (16.9 ± 6.5 vs. 4.48 ± 1.63 vs. 5.01 ± 2.29 %IA/mL). CONCLUSION: 68Ga-HZ220 is a promising bimodal ligand for noninvasive PET imaging and intraoperative optical imaging of GRPr-expressing malignancies. Bimodal nuclear/fluorescence imaging may not only improve cancer detection and guide surgical resections, but also improve our understanding of the uptake of GRPr ligands on the cellular level.
Authors: Ofer Yossepowitch; Anders Bjartell; James A Eastham; Markus Graefen; Bertrand D Guillonneau; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Rodolfo Montironi; Franceso Montorsi Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2008-10-01 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Hanwen Zhang; Keelara Abiraj; Daniel L J Thorek; Beatrice Waser; Peter M Smith-Jones; Michael Honer; Jean Claude Reubi; Helmut R Maecke Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-09-14 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Kirstin A Zettlitz; Christopher M Waldmann; Wen-Ting K Tsai; Richard Tavaré; Jeffrey Collins; Jennifer M Murphy; Anna M Wu Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2019-03-15 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Jack P M Andrews; Christophe Portal; Tashfeen Walton; Mark G Macaskill; Patrick W F Hadoke; Carlos Alcaide Corral; Christophe Lucatelli; Simon Wilson; Ian Wilson; Gillian MacNaught; Marc R Dweck; David E Newby; Adriana A S Tavares Journal: Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2020-06-01 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Wenting K Tsai; Kirstin A Zettlitz; Richard Tavaré; Naoko Kobayashi; Robert E Reiter; Anna M Wu Journal: Theranostics Date: 2018-11-12 Impact factor: 11.556
Authors: Feng Chen; Brian Madajewski; Kai Ma; Daniella Karassawa Zanoni; Hilda Stambuk; Melik Z Turker; Sébastien Monette; Li Zhang; Barney Yoo; Peiming Chen; Richard J C Meester; Sander de Jonge; Pablo Montero; Evan Phillips; Thomas P Quinn; Mithat Gönen; Sonia Sequeira; Elisa de Stanchina; Pat Zanzonico; Ulrich Wiesner; Snehal G Patel; Michelle S Bradbury Journal: Sci Adv Date: 2019-12-04 Impact factor: 14.136