Jianhong Zhao1, Junwei Chen1, Shengnan Ma1, Qianqian Liu1, Lixian Huang1, Xiani Chen1, Kaiyan Lou1, Wei Wang1,2. 1. Shanghai Key Laboratory of Chemical Biology, School of Pharmacy, and State Key Laboratory of Bioengineering Reactor, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai 200237, China. 2. Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131-0001, USA.
Abstract
Multimodality optical imaging probes have emerged as powerful tools that improve detection sensitivity and accuracy, important in disease diagnosis and treatment. In this review, we focus on recent developments of optical fluorescence imaging (OFI) probe integration with other imaging modalities such as X-ray computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), positron emission tomography (PET), single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), and photoacoustic imaging (PAI). The imaging technologies are briefly described in order to introduce the strengths and limitations of each techniques and the need for further multimodality optical imaging probe development. The emphasis of this account is placed on how design strategies are currently implemented to afford physicochemically and biologically compatible multimodality optical fluorescence imaging probes. We also present studies that overcame intrinsic disadvantages of each imaging technique by multimodality approach with improved detection sensitivity and accuracy.
Multimodality optical imaging probes have emerged as powerful tools that improve detection sensitivity and accuracy, important in disease diagnosis and treatment. In this review, we focus on recent developments of optical fluorescence imaging (OFI) probe integration with other imaging modalities such as X-ray computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), positron emission tomography (PET), single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), and photoacoustic imaging (PAI). The imaging technologies are briefly described in order to introduce the strengths and limitations of each techniques and the need for further multimodality optical imaging probe development. The emphasis of this account is placed on how design strategies are currently implemented to afford physicochemically and biologically compatible multimodality optical fluorescence imaging probes. We also present studies that overcame intrinsic disadvantages of each imaging technique by multimodality approach with improved detection sensitivity and accuracy.
Precise medical diagnosis and therapy demand sensitive and accurate imaging techniques. In the past few decades, we have witnessed significant improvements in imaging technology in preclinical and clinical translational research and its applications. Optical imaging, particular fluorescence imaging, is widely used in histologic examination of cells, and has gained clinical interest and potential application in intraoperative use. Clinical studies have demonstrated that the optical imaging-guided tissue resection achieves improved removal of cancerous tissue and reduced local recurrence. However, due to photon scattering and light attenuation of biological tissue, fluorescence imaging is limited by depth penetration. It is also difficult to provide quantitative or tomographic information. By combining two or more imaging techniques, multimodal imaging has become an important approach to overcome the limitation of the fluorescence imaging and to achieve noninvasive imaging at greater depths of penetration and higher resolution, and sensitivity required for more accurate diagnosis and delineation of disease lesions. As each imaging modality uses different contrasting agents with distinctive chemical compositions, sizes, solubility, and pharmacokinetic profiles (Supplementary Information Table S1), it is difficult to employ a cocktail approach by using a mixture of various contrast agents together in a single dose while achieve spatiotemporal consistency for all imaging techniques. Therefore, a single probe, which integrates dual or multiple imaging contrasting agents, is preferred for dual- or multimodality imaging applications. In addition, the use of multimodality probe can also reduce toxicity evaluation and pharmacokinetic study workload in preclinical research and reduce the number of quality controls needed during later clinical translational research.Given the recent surge in the amount of scientific literature published concerning these topics, it is a challenging task for us to provide a comprehensive review on this topic. Therefore, this review aims to give a brief account of this emerging research field, emphasizing the strategies used for multimodality fluorescent probe design without delving into details of their biomedical applications. We begin with a brief introduction of advantages and disadvantages of commonly used imaging modalities to help our readers understand the background of each imaging technique and why multimodality optical imaging probes are needed. We then deal with design strategies that were implemented to create physicochemically and biologically compatible multimodality optical fluorescence imaging probes to overcome intrinsic drawbacks of each imaging techniques while achieving improved detection sensitivity and accuracy. More specifically, we focus on multimodality optical fluorescent imaging (OFI) probes that integrate fluorescence reporting groups (fluorophores) with other contrast agents used in X-ray computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), positron emission tomography (PET), single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), and/or photoacoustic imaging (PAI). Furthermore, probes that incorporate additional functional moieties such as targeting groups and therapeutic agents are included5, 6. Case study examples are provided. Finally, we give a summary and our own perspectives of this emerging field.
Brief overview of different imaging modalities
Optical fluorescence imaging and near-infrared fluorescence imaging
Optical fluorescence imaging (OFI) using fluorescence microscopy has become one of the most important real-time imaging techniques used to study molecular events in both living cells and ex vivo tissue samples. Recently, OFI has been increasingly applied in imaging-guided surgery. The fluorescence reporting groups for OFI include quantum dots8, 9, lanthanide-doped upconversion nanoparticles, organic dyes, fluorescent proteins, aggregation induced emission luminogen13, 14 and etc. Fluorescence emissions in the visible region (400–650 nm) usually have limited utility for in vivo imaging applications due to attenuation and scattering of light and interference caused by autofluorescence from endogenous substances such as cytochromes, hemoglobin, and water molecules. Near-infrared fluorescence (NIRF) imaging detects fluorescence emissions in the region of 650—900 nm, has low background tissue absorption for deeper penetration depth, and is more suitable for in vivo preclinical and clinical imaging studies15, 16, 17, 18. Some representative NIR dyes used in multimodality imaging are listed in Fig. 1. Among them, indocyanine green (ICG) is the only NIRF dye approved by Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in the United States for clinical use19, 20. Another NIR dye, IRDye 800CW, has entered clinical trials. In addition, NIRF imaging in the second biological window (1000—1400 nm), also named over-thousand near-infrared (OTN) imaging, has attracted significant attention in in vivo imaging applications due to its even deeper tissue penetration, higher image contrast, and reduced phototoxicity and photobleaching. OTN fluorescence imaging agents include Ag2S quantum dots, rare-earth doped materials, Ni-doped magnetic nanocrystals, and single-wall carbon nanotube.
Figure 1
Representative NIRF dyes used in dual-modality optical fluorescence imaging.
Representative NIRF dyes used in dual-modality optical fluorescence imaging.
X-ray computed tomography
X-ray computed tomography (CT) is a technique based on X-ray beam absorbance differences in various tissues, resulting in a three-dimensional anatomic image useful for medical diagnosis of tumors, brain injury, ischemia, and other disease conditions. CT has the advantage of high spatial resolution up to 0.5 mm, unlimited penetration, and fast acquisition of 3D anatomical image. It is also widely available in hospitals and is relatively cost effective. The major limitation of CT is its low soft tissue sensitivity and the lack of functional information. The low sensitivity of soft tissue can be compensated by combined imaging with MRI. More often, in order to increase sensitivity and selectivity and to better discrimination between normal and pathological tissues, CT contrast agents which strongly absorbs X-rays are implemented and include iodinated agents, gold nanoparticles29, 30, 31 and TaO.
Magnetic resonance imaging
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a versatile imaging modality based upon nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) in the presence of a strong magnetic field and radiofrequency waves. Images are generated from the differences in longitudinal relaxation time (T1) and/or transverse relaxation time (T2) of a specific NMR-active nuclide in different tissues when specially designed radiofrequency pulse sequences are applied. The most common nuclide used in MRI is 1H due to its ubiquitous existence in water molecules in biological systems and its high NMR sensitivity among all nuclei. 1H-MRI can provide 3D anatomical as well as physiological information depending on the specialized MRI technique used. Compared with CT, MRI uses safer non-ionizing radiation and has better spatial resolution for soft tissues. Other merits of MRI include unlimited depth penetration and high spatial resolution. A drawback of MRI is its low sensitivity. Therefore, longer acquisition time and larger amounts of imaging agents are often needed. Moreover, MRI contrast agents, such as superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO) nanoparticles (NPs), or gadolinium ion (Gd3+) complexes, are employed to disturb the local magnetic field of the targets of interest and to enhance imaging contrast by exerting distinctive proton relaxation effects in tissues: SPIO NPs increases T2 relaxations and form darker spots in images, while Gd3+ paramagnetic complexes decrease T1 and result in a brighter region. Due to the low sensitivity of MRI imaging, targeted delivery is often adopted to increase signal contrast in the tissue of interest. Alternatively, MRI imaging techniques detecting nuclei other than 1H have also been explored in recent years, particularly 19F-MRI due to its low background and relatively high sensitivity of the 19F nucleus in biological samples34, 35, 36. Notably, 19F-MRI provides local distributions of 19F atoms more suitable for functional imaging.
Positron emission tomography
Positron emission tomography (PET) is based on the detection of high-energy photon pairs produced during an annihilation collision between a positron and an electron, from which 3D images are reconstructed by computer analysis. PET contrasting agents contain positron-emitting radionuclides, such as 18F, 64Cu, and 68Ga. (Supplementary Information Table S1). These radionuclides typically have short half-lives and are synthesized directly from a cyclotron near the PET imaging facility, where they are chemically incorporated into the structure of PET probes and used immediately to avoid significant decay. Clinically, 18F-labelled imaging agents are used for cancer diagnosis (e.g., [18F]-FDG) and neuroimaging applications (e.g., [18F]-florbetaben for diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease). Notable advantages of PET include unlimited depth of penetration and excellent sensitivity. However, it is a relatively costly procedure and has limited availability due to the requirement of a nearby cyclotron. The main limitation of PET imaging is its low spatial resolution and lack of anatomic reference frames (Supplementary Information Table S1). The low spatial resolution can be compensated by intraoperative optical fluorescence imaging in dual-modality OFI/PET imaging, while additional CT or MRI imaging can provide the anatomic frame in a combined PET/CT or PET/MRI.
Single-photon emission computed tomography
Though similar to PET, single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) implements radionuclides which provide 3D images using a different nuclear decay mechanism. The SPECT radioisotopes (e.g., 99mTc, 123I, and 111In) decay via the emission of single γ rays and generally have longer decay half-lives than those of PET. Therefore, they are more convenient to transport for medical use (Table 1). SPECT is inherently less sensitive than PET, but is less expensive and more clinically available. SPECT also shares similar strengths and limitations with PET, which include unlimited depth penetration, high sensitivity slightly lower than PET, low spatial resolution, and minimal 3D anatomical information (Supplementary Information Table S1).
Table 1
Representative radionuclides for dual-modality OFI/PET and OFI/SPECT probes.
Radionuclide
Imaging modality
Half-life
Emaxγ (keV)
Representative chelator
18F
PET
109.8 min
640 (97%)a
N/A
68Ga
PET
67.6 min
1899 (89%)a
DOTA/NOTA
64Cu
PET
12.7 h
657 (18%)a
DOTA/NOTA/sarcophagine
89Zr
PET
3.3 d
897 (23%)a
DFO
111In
SPECT
2.8 d
245
DTPA/DOTA
99mTc
SPECT
6.01 h
140
HYNIC
177Lu
SPECT
6.72 h
497
DOTA
188Re
SPECT
16.9 h
155
(His)(CO)3
β+ purity of the decay.
Representative radionuclides for dual-modality OFI/PET and OFI/SPECT probes.β+ purity of the decay.
Photoacoustic imaging
Photoacoustic imaging (PAI), also termed photoacoustic tomography (PAT), is an emerging non-invasive imaging technique42, 43. When highly absorbed endogenous or exogenous contrast agents within tissue are irradiated by a short laser pulse, the energy absorbed is quickly converted to heat, generating a local pressure increase due to thermos-elastic expansion which then propagates as ultrasonic waves and becomes the photoacoustic signal. Pulsed laser light in near-IR ranges (650–900 nm) is often used because of minimized tissue attenuation in this wavelength region. Because PAI has high spatial resolution (up to 0.15 mm) and deep tissue penetration (up to 7 cm), this imaging technique is a highly effective method to visualize both tissue structure and function. Multispectral optoacoustic tomography (MSOT) is a technology which allows irradiation with multiple wavelengths of laser light and then reconstruction of mixed and/or unmixed PAI images, and is particularly powerful in resolving multiple physiological, morphological, vascular, and molecular features44, 45. PAI contrast agents can be modified to include targeting and/or biological stimuli-activatable functions and imaging can be performed using either dual or multiple wavelengths. In addition, PAI has excellent temporal resolution which allows real-time imaging in perfusion kinetics studies of the entire tumor volume. Moreover, PAI contrast agents are often used to convert energy of the absorbed NIR light to heat for photo-thermal therapy (TPP). Overall, PAI is an effective and powerful tool for real-time noninvasive biochemical and functional imaging in preclinical and clinical applications. Compared to optical fluorescence imaging, PAI has relatively less sensitivity due to the limitations of acoustic transducers. Other limitations of PAI include restricted penetration depth while imaging acoustically mismatched tissues, such as bone and lung.
Design and study of multimodality OFI probes
Dual-modality OFI/CT imaging probes
Since CT imaging provides the 3D anatomical structures which OFI cannot achieve, while OFI offers high superficial resolution and sensitivity in providing biochemical information that CT imaging is lacking, OFI and CT imaging modalities compensates each other. Nonetheless, dual-modality OFI/CT probes face a challenge: they must integrate two imaging agents with distinctive sensitivity. The less sensitive CT requires much larger amount of mass loading of contrast agents for efficient signal readout than does OFI. On the other hand, the requirement of relatively large amount of CT contrast agent further raises the toxicity and/or solubility issues. Biocompatibility and/or targeted selectivity of the dual-modality probe is another issue for probe design. It is often necessary to attach a targeting group for enrichment of CT contrast agent at the desired sites. Considering all the above challenges, targeted nanoprobe-based design is likely the platform of choice for dual-modality OFI/CT probes (Supplementary Information Table S2). Nanoprobes allow entrapment of the CT contrast agents with a protective layer of biocompatible materials, and thus solve problems of toxicity and/or solubility. To compensate the low CT sensitivity, both the loading of CT contrast agents and the size of the nanoprobe are adjustable. It is also convenient to functionalize the nanoprobe with fluorescent agents. Furthermore, conjugation of a large targeting group (e.g., antibody) or multiple targeting group copies on a nanoprobe for targeted delivery of CT contrast agents is possible. CT contrast agents used in recent dual-modality OFI/CT probes included iodinated oil, gold nanoparticles, Bi2S3, TaO, and etc., while various fluorescent materials such as Cy 5.5, aggregated AIE dyes, Cu-dopedCdS quantum dots, and persistent luminescence nanoparticles have been adopted as fluorescence reporting groups (Supplementary Information Table S2). To increase the biocompatibility and in vivo circulation time for these nanoprobes, PEGylation is often employed23, 51, 52. Typical multilayer construction of a dual-modality OFI/CT nanoprobe is shown in Fig. 2.
Figure 2
Typical design of a multilayer dual-modality OFI/CT or OFI/MRI (iron-oxide based) nanoprobe. The functionalized layers I and II are for attachment of fluorescence reporting agent or conjugation with additional biocompatible and targeting group.
Typical design of a multilayer dual-modality OFI/CT or OFI/MRI (iron-oxide based) nanoprobe. The functionalized layers I and II are for attachment of fluorescence reporting agent or conjugation with additional biocompatible and targeting group.Qin et al. reported a novel hybrid OFI/CT nanoprobe, Ag2S-I@DSPE-PEG2000-FA, assembled by mixing Ag2S QDs and iodinated oil in the presence of distearoylphosphatidylethanolamine-poly(ethylene)-folate (DSPE-PEG2000-FA) and other small molecules in water. Ag2S QDs emits fluorescence at 1170 nm in the second NIR window with greatly reduced tissue autofluorescence. After injection, the probe was initially enriched in the spleen and then move to the tumor site after 12 h and stayed up to 48 h as indicated from fluorescence and CT imaging (Fig. 3). The low toxicity and long blood circulation time made the nanoprobe particularly suitable for applications such as preoperative investigation and intraoperative imaging. In a second case, Lu et al. developed a NIR persistently luminescent nanoparticle (Zn2.94Ga1.96Ge2O10:Cr3+,Pr3+, termed ZGGO:Cr,Pr). Excited in vitro at 254 nm, and then injected into the living animal for in vivo imaging with NIR emission at 695 nm, it was selected as the nanoparticle core to build-up a core—shell nanoparticle covered by a layer of TaO shell functioned as CT contrast agent. The outer TaO layer was further coated with a layer of modified silica by the reagent 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane. The synthesized nanoparticles had amine groups on their surface for further convenient conjugation with PEG chains and also cyclic CNGRCGG peptides as the targeting group (Fig. 4). The obtained nanoprobe, NGR-PEG-ZGGO:Cr,Pr@TaO@SiO2 could detect the tumor site in HepG2tumor-bearing nude mice in vivo with either NIRF or CT imaging.
Dual-modality OFI/MRI and tri-modality OFI/MRI/CT imaging probes
Similar to dual-modality OFI/CT imaging probes, the addition of MRI imaging modality in dual-modality OFI/MRI provides 3D anatomical information which OFI cannot offer, while OFI provides real-time, sensitive, and selective biochemical information which MRI lacks. Compared with CT, MRI is a non-ionizing imaging technique which is safer than CT in terms of ionizing radiation. Moreover, MRI offers much better soft-tissue contrast than CT. The combination of OFI and MRI is one of the most favorable dual-modality combinations (Supplementary Information Table S3). CT modality to enhance bone contrast has been occasionally added to obtain tri-modality OFI/MRI/CT probes. The number of tri-modality OFI/MRI/CT imaging probes has increased in recent years (Supplementary Information Table S4). Challenges are generally associated with the design of dual-modality OFI/MRI probes. First is the inherent difference in sensitivity and since OFI is several orders higher in sensitivity than MRI, more MRI contrast units must be loaded into the probe relative to the number of fluorescence reporting groups to compensate for the low sensitivity of MRI. The second challenge is related to the mismatch of physical properties between the fluorophores and MRI contrast agents; for example, iron oxide is a fluorescence quenching material, therefore, a spacer layer between iron oxide and the fluorophore is necessary for fluorescence signal readout (Fig. 2) and adds significantly to the structural complexity of the probe when additional targeting groups and biocompatible modifications are also considered. Some challenges for multi-modality MRI probe design are related to the inherent properties of the MRI contrast agent. For example, gadolinium complexes are required to stay close to water molecules to give T1-enhanced MR signals, therefore, they should be stay at the hydrophilic outer surface or hydrophilic inner surface on the nano-holes of a nanoprobe to achieve good signal contrast. Moreover, surface modifications are required to avoid aggregation of the MRI agent because iron oxide nanoparticles tend to aggregate.Compared with diverse structures of dual-modality OFI/MRI probes ranging from large nanoprobes to small molecules (Supplementary Information Table S3), trimodality OFI/MRI/CT probes were mostly nanoparticle-based, with the exception of one case where the trimodal probe was based on metal organic framework (Supplementary Information Table S4). Although various fluorescent agents were adopted into the dual-modality OFI/MRI or multi-modality probes, the MRI contrasting agents used were limited to three major types: gadolinium(III) ions chelates, iron oxide nanoparticles, and 19F-enriched materials. They have substantial differences in OFI/MRI probe design. Generally, the structural features of an iron oxide based OFI/MRI dual-modality nanoprobe is very similar to that of a typical OFI/CT nanoprobes, shown in Fig. 2. In contrast, Gd(III)-based OFI/MRI dual-modality probes more resemble radio-metal ion-based OFI/PET or OFI/SPECT probes since they share the similarly preinstalled chelating ligands in their structures. 19F-based OFI/MRI probes are structurally diverse, affected by the nature of the 19F-material (e.g., small-molecule or polymer) used.Stable gadolinium(III) ion complexes containing DTPA (diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid) or DOTA (1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-N,N′,N″,N′″-tetraacetic acid) are extensively used in clinics. The simple attachment of an organic fluorophore to a Gd(III)'s chelator (DOTA or DTPA) creates a dual-modality OFI/MRI imaging probe55, 56. However, the 1:1 mol ratio of MRI and optical components resulted in a discrepancy in sensitivity between two imaging modalities. To alleviate this discrepancy, Harrison et al. designed a multimeric NIRF/MRI contrast agent in which a single contrast molecule contains 3:1 mol ratio of Gd complex to NIR fluorophore. The attachment of the NIR-fluorophore resulted in enhanced cell uptake through organic-anion transporting polypeptides (OATPs), also favorable for cell MRI imaging. However, the probe accumulation in the tumors were only detected by OFI, but not MRI, suggesting the necessity for further improvement of the local concentration of MRI contrast agents. Gadolinium(III)-fluorescent dye complexes can also function as activatable MRI and OFI probes for ion detection through ion exchange reaction58, 59, 60. During the process, the fluorescent dye changes from coordination with Gd(III) to free state or complexation with another metal cation, and generates fluorescence change. An example is shown in Fig. 5. The number of bound water molecules around the Gd(III) ion or the size of the whole complex also varies, resulting in a shift of r1 value and the T1-weighted MRI signal. The signal changes in OFI and MRI modalities and therefore gives more reliable detection of the ion of interest. Recently, Wang et al. reported a coumarin dye-Gd(III)-DO3A complex as a dual-modality OFI/MRI probe for fluoride anion detection. The replacement of the coumarin dye by F− increased the r value from 1.67 to 2.957 (mmol/L)−1 s−1 and resulted in bright spots in T1-weighted MRI images in a concentration-dependent manner; a ratiometric response of fluorescence emission from 470 to 460 nm was simultaneously observed.
The combination of OFI/PET imaging modalities offers a highly compensatory and synergistic way for visualization and diagnosis of disease lesions, since PET allows non-invasive, quantitative, and extremely sensitive in vivo imaging without penetration limitation, and OFI offers low cost, convenient operation, multiplexing capability, and high spatial resolution at histologic or superficial levels77, 78. The OFI/PET dual-modality probes are therefore promising tools in clinical preoperative PET imaging and intraoperative optical imaging-guided surgery. Since both imaging techniques have comparable sensitivity, equal mole ratios of each signal agent are generally satisfactory for both OFI and PET imaging. Another advantage of the dual-modality OFI/PET imaging probe is that due to the high sensitivity of each modality and because only a trace amount of the imaging probe is needed, chemical toxicity is generally not a serious issue.To design a dual-modality OFI/PET probe, NIR dye and especially cyanine-based NIR organic dye (Fig. 1), is preferred for its relatively deeper tissue penetration. Fluorophores with emission wavelengths in the visible region are also tolerated, since fluorescence imaging is partially compensated by PET with unlimited depths of penetration. PET tracers are positron-emitting radionuclides such as 18F, 64Cu, and 68Ga. There properties are shown in Table 1. Among them, 18F labeling is generally achieved by chemical synthesis starting from readily available 18F anion. Radiometal ions are introduced by a two-step process: an initial pre-installation of a metal chelator by chemical synthesis and a later chelating step with the radiometal ion. Each radiometal ion has its own preferred chelators (Table 1 and Fig. 13). Other specifically designed chelators can also be considered after careful study of the chelating conditions and bio-stability. The choice of the radiometal ion and its chelator pair largely determine the chelation reaction conditions such as temperature, time, ratios of radio-labeling, and also the in vivo stability of the chelate. The choice may also affect the receptor binding properties of a targeted multifunctional probe. Another important consideration for the choice of PET radionuclide is the biological event to be tracked. The half-life of positron-emitting radionuclide for labelling must correlate with biological events of interest; otherwise, the obtained image may not truly reflect the spatial distribution of the target event. For example, 18F has a relatively short half-life of 109.8 min and is best used for labelling small molecules having fast clearance rate, while 64Cu with a half-life of 12.7 h could be used to track monoclonal antibodies for up to 48 h.
Figure 13
Representative chelating groups for radiometal ions used in multi-modality fluorescent probes.
Representative chelating groups for radiometal ions used in multi-modality fluorescent probes.Another important consideration during dual-modality OFI/PET probe design is related to the targeting group. Since PET imaging detects the distribution of the radionuclides, any nonspecific binding or ion-leakage of the probe would generate non-targeted signal or artifacts. An example of comparison of targeted and nontargeted images is given in Fig. 15. Generally, targeting group is necessary to improve accuracy in PET detection by reducing the nonspecific binding (Supplementary Information Table S5). The target group also affects double-labelling strategies used in construction of the dual-modality probes (Fig. 14). Depending on the sizes of the targeting group and the availability of the multiple conjugations sites, OFI/PET dual-modality imaging probes fall into three major categories: dual-labelled monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), dual-labelled peptides, and dual-labelled small biomolecules (Supplementary Information Table S5).
Representative synthetic schemes of dual-modality OFI/18F-PET probes. (A) Synthesis of an 18F-labelled BODIPY-C16/triglyceride. (B) Synthesis of an 18F-labelled cyanine dye using boronateas as the 18F-trapping group.
Representative synthetic schemes of dual-modality OFI/18F-PET probes. (A) Synthesis of an 18F-labelled BODIPY-C16/triglyceride. (B) Synthesis of an 18F-labelled cyanine dye using boronateas as the 18F-trapping group.Currently, most OFI/PET dual-modality probes are developed for use in oncology because of their potential translation to clinic in cancer diagnosing, staging and therapy monitoring (Supplementary Information Table S5). Other biomedical research fields including brown adipose tissues, intracranial hemorrhage and damage93, 94, myocardial perfusion95, 96 and Alzheimer's disease have also considered dual-modal probe use in their preclinical studies in order to unravel or track the physiological or pathological changes inside the body. With both the upsurge in development of synthetic labelling methodology and the expansion of biomedical applications, we expect advancement of use of the dual-modality OFI/PET probe in translational medicine in the near future.
Dual-modality OFI/SPECT imaging probes
Similar to dual-modality OFI/PET imaging probes, dual-modality OFI/SPECT probes combine advantages of OFI's convenient, real-time, and high resolution superficial imaging ability together with SPECT's high penetration ability, excellent sensitivity, and quantitative signals. Probe design is also very similar, except that γ-emitting radioisotopes such as 99mTc and 111In are used. For recently reported dual-modality OFI/SPECT probes, the most frequently adopted SPECT radionucleus was 111In (Supplementary Information Table S6) and the preferred fluorescence reporting groups were cyanine-based NIR dyes (Fig. 1). Targeting groups were generally employed to enhance the contrast for the disease lesions or biological events of interest (Supplementary Information Table S6).Many of dual-modality OFI/SPECT probes reported were dual labelled antibodies98, 99, 100. For example, Hekman et al. reported a dual labeled antibody, 111In-DTPA-labetuzumab-IRDye800CW, for detection of pulmonary micro-metastases in a mouse model. Labetuzumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody, was selected as the targeting group for tumor colonies overexpressing carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA). The probe was able to detect tumor metastases at submillimeter sizes not visible to the naked eye in both SPECT and fluorescence imaging (Fig. 16). Moreover, fluorescence imaging-guided surgery identified more pulmonary nodule lesions than did preoperative SPECT/CT imaging and facilitated a complete removal of tumor lesions. Colocalization of dual-modal images helps to accurately detect small metastatic tumors. The simultaneous consideration of preoperative and intraoperative imaging techniques provides a better localization and assists with complete resection of tumor lesions. Besides antibodies, some small-size biomolecules, such as peptides, short RNA sequences, and lipopolysaccharides, could also be used as targeting groups to construct dual-labelled OFI/SPECT imaging probes.
Dual-modality OFI/PAI imaging probes, noted for their capability of utilization of multiple endogenous and exogenous PAI contrast agents in a multiplexing manner (MSOT) with fluorescence imaging, offer a robust, noninvasive, and sensitive approach to achieve both anatomical and functional imaging. There are several advantages for a combined use of OFI and PAI. First, poor spatial resolution of OFI in tissue imaging is nicely compensated by the high ultrasonic spatial resolution of PAI. Second, information obtained from 3D volumetric imaging with PAI and superficial images of intraoperical OFI can verify each other for more accurate delineation of disease lesions. Furthermore, endogenous PAI contrast agents (e.g., hemoglobin, melanin, water or lipids) can provide additional anatomical and functional imaging of vascularization, oxygen levels, and morphological details. Generally, there are two major classes of dual-modality OFI/PAI probes depending upon whether both signals are generated from a single fluorophore or different fluorescence and PAI contrast agents.A dual-modality OFI/PAI probe can be constructed from a single fluorophore114, 115. Generally, NIR dyes with a high molar extinction coefficient and a moderate fluorescence quantum yield are selected as the fluorophore for better tissue penetration. The moderate quantum yield is required to ensure the generation of modest signals for both modalities, since two signal generation processes of OFI and PAI compete with each other for energy absorption from a NIR laser. For example, ICG, the only FDA-approved NIR fluorescence dye, has been investigated as a dual-functional OFI/PAI probe to image sentinel lymph nodes, lymphatic vessels, and the course and flow of lymphatic vessels in combined NIRF and MSOT imaging studies. However, ICG may be disadvantageous because of its short clearance time, relatively low photostability, and high-binding to plasma proteins. Recently, ICG-loaded nanoprobes were developed to obtain improved stability and longer circulation times during dual modality OFI/PAI imaging of different tumors46, 117, 118. Beziere et al. reported that PEGylated liposome-ICG consisting of entirely clinically-approved material showed great potential as an imaging agent for perfusion investigations of vascular permeability and lymphatic system flow. In a separate study, Ermolayev et al. demonstrated combined use of external liposomal ICG (lipo-ICG) for studies of tumor perfusion dynamics and for tracking endogenous oxygenated (HbO2) and deoxygenated haemoglobin (Hb) in a breast tumor model using the volumetric MSOT (vMSOT) technique. The major blood vessels identified in 3D vMSOT imaging was then verified by comparison of 2D cross-section images from noninvasive 3D imaging data using haematoxylin-eosin staining (H&E) and planar NIRF imaging of a tumor cryo-section (Fig. 17). The well-matched images from the two different modalities suggest promising potential of the dual-modality NIRF/MSOT probe in noninvasive preoperational diagnosis and NIRF or vMSOT guided surgery. Functionalization of liposome-based ICG nanoprobe with targeted groups (e.g., mAbs) and drugs (e.g., DOX) for tumor chemotherapy was also reported. Aside from ICG, other NIR dyes, such as Cy7 (CDnir7 in Fig. 1), squaraine dye (Usq), croconaine dye (CR780), were also explored as contrasting fluorophores in dual-modality NIR/PAI imaging. Among them, CDnir7 is an NIR dye identified from high-throughput screening specifically for targeting macrophages with potential use in in vivo imaging of inflammation. The squaraine dye (Usq) functioned as an activatable probe, which reacts selectively with bioaminothiols inside the body and triggers fluorescence/PA signal changes indicating their levels. PEGlyated CR780 could be self-assembled into nanoparticles with enhanced tumor accumulation, suitable for dual-modality OFI/PAI imaging-guided PTT in cancer theranostic.
Multimodality fluorescence imaging, which combines fluorescence imaging with other imaging modalities, has emerged as a powerful tool for improving sensitivity and accuracy, critical in improved disease diagnosis and treatment (Supplementary Information Tables S2S7). The improvements in imaging techniques, instrumentation, contrast materials and synthetic methodology will continue to push the boundaries of multimodality imaging methods and probe development. Optical imaging combined with other new imaging modalities is certainly promising, but what ultimately drives the future multimodality probe development is emerging and unmet clinical needs, which include but not limited to imaging-guided surgery, oncology, neurological disease, and personalized medicine. So far, no imaging probe intended for use in dual or multi-modality imaging has been approved by the FDA for clinical use. Most of current probes were developed and investigated for the preclinical biomedical research field, in which information from both deep tissue and superficial biochemical imaging was required or needed to be verified from each other. The question whether one plus one (a single probe with dual-modality) is better than two (a mixture of two probes) has yet to be carefully examined for the purpose of future translation to the clinic.We have discussed the prospectives for each specific combination of multimodality fluorescence imaging probes. Challenges faced in a multimodality optical fluorescence probe design are tremendous. The challenges are not only dependent on the physical properties of contrast agents and the biocompatibility of the materials, but also associated with the nature of the probe's construction: a small molecule based probe or a nanoprobe. When we consider distinct differences in the sensitivity and the temporal or spatial resolution of any other imaging modality used, an additional layer of complexity is added. More complexity is added when targeting groups, activation or trigger group, and/or therapeutic functions are included. It is not an easy task to select the best combinations of materials and contrast agents, to find the methods to assemble them, and to achieve optimal pharmacokinetics properties (absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion) and toxicity profiles with also excellent target accumulation. The process will require systems engineering and multiple rounds of meticulous optimization. All these efforts would potentially lead to the discovery of novel theranostic agents for earlier and more accurate diagnoses and cost-efficient intervention to give patients longer and higher quality lives.
Authors: X Michalet; F F Pinaud; L A Bentolila; J M Tsay; S Doose; J J Li; G Sundaresan; A M Wu; S S Gambhir; S Weiss Journal: Science Date: 2005-01-28 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Fabien Hyafil; Jean-Christophe Cornily; Jonathan E Feig; Ronald Gordon; Esad Vucic; Vardan Amirbekian; Edward A Fisher; Valentin Fuster; Laurent J Feldman; Zahi A Fayad Journal: Nat Med Date: 2007-04-08 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Gary J Kelloff; John M Hoffman; Bruce Johnson; Howard I Scher; Barry A Siegel; Edward Y Cheng; Bruce D Cheson; Joyce O'shaughnessy; Kathryn Z Guyton; David A Mankoff; Lalitha Shankar; Steven M Larson; Caroline C Sigman; Richard L Schilsky; Daniel C Sullivan Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2005-04-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Kumar R Bhushan; Preeti Misra; Fangbing Liu; Sanjeev Mathur; Robert E Lenkinski; John V Frangioni Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2008-12-31 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: C Andrew Boswell; Xiankai Sun; Weijun Niu; Gary R Weisman; Edward H Wong; Arnold L Rheingold; Carolyn J Anderson Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2004-03-11 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: Rachela Popovtzer; Ashish Agrawal; Nicholas A Kotov; Aron Popovtzer; James Balter; Thomas E Carey; Raoul Kopelman Journal: Nano Lett Date: 2008-12 Impact factor: 11.189
Authors: Hye Jin Lee; Emily B Ehlerding; Dawei Jiang; Todd E Barnhart; Tianye Cao; Weijun Wei; Carolina A Ferreira; Peng Huang; Jonathan W Engle; Weibo Cai Journal: Am J Cancer Res Date: 2019-07-01 Impact factor: 6.166