PURPOSE: Radiolabelled somatostatin-based antagonists show a higher uptake in tumour-bearing mouse models than agonists of similar or even distinctly higher receptor affinity. Very similar results were obtained with another family of G protein-coupled receptor ligands, the bombesin family. We describe a new conjugate, RM2, with the chelator DOTA coupled to D-Phe-Gln-Trp-Ala-Val-Gly-His-Sta-Leu-NH(2) via the cationic spacer 4-amino-1-carboxymethyl-piperidine for labelling with radiometals such as (111)In and (68)Ga. METHODS: RM2 was synthesized on a solid support and evaluated in vitro in PC-3 cells. IC(50) and K(d) values were determined. The antagonist potency was evaluated by immunofluorescence-based internalization and Ca(2+) mobilization assays. Biodistribution studies were performed in PC-3 and LNCaP tumour-bearing mice with (111)In-RM2 and (68)Ga-RM2, respectively. PET/CT studies were performed on PC-3 and LNCaP tumour-bearing nude mice with (68)Ga-RM2. RESULTS: RM2 and (111)In-RM2 are high-affinity and selective ligands for the GRP receptor (7.7 ± 3.3 nmol/l for RM2; 9.3 ± 3.3 nmol/l for (nat)In-RM2). The potent antagonistic properties were confirmed by an immunofluorescence-based internalization and Ca(2+) mobilization assays. (68)Ga- and (111)In-RM2 showed high and specific uptake in both the tumour and the pancreas. Uptake in the tumour remained high (15.2 ± 4.8%IA/g at 1 h; 11.7 ± 2.4%IA/g at 4 h), whereas a relatively fast washout from the pancreas and the other abdominal organs was observed. Uptake in the pancreas decreased rapidly from 22.6 ± 4.7%IA/g at 1 h to 1.5 ± 0.5%IA/g at 4 h. CONCLUSION: RM2 was shown to be a potent GRPr antagonist. Pharmacokinetics and imaging studies indicate that (111)In-RM2 and (68)Ga-RM2 are ideal candidates for clinical SPECT and PET studies.
PURPOSE: Radiolabelled somatostatin-based antagonists show a higher uptake in tumour-bearing mouse models than agonists of similar or even distinctly higher receptor affinity. Very similar results were obtained with another family of G protein-coupled receptor ligands, the bombesin family. We describe a new conjugate, RM2, with the chelator DOTA coupled to D-Phe-Gln-Trp-Ala-Val-Gly-His-Sta-Leu-NH(2) via the cationic spacer 4-amino-1-carboxymethyl-piperidine for labelling with radiometals such as (111)In and (68)Ga. METHODS:RM2 was synthesized on a solid support and evaluated in vitro in PC-3 cells. IC(50) and K(d) values were determined. The antagonist potency was evaluated by immunofluorescence-based internalization and Ca(2+) mobilization assays. Biodistribution studies were performed in PC-3 and LNCaP tumour-bearing mice with (111)In-RM2 and (68)Ga-RM2, respectively. PET/CT studies were performed on PC-3 and LNCaP tumour-bearing nude mice with (68)Ga-RM2. RESULTS:RM2 and (111)In-RM2 are high-affinity and selective ligands for the GRP receptor (7.7 ± 3.3 nmol/l for RM2; 9.3 ± 3.3 nmol/l for (nat)In-RM2). The potent antagonistic properties were confirmed by an immunofluorescence-based internalization and Ca(2+) mobilization assays. (68)Ga- and (111)In-RM2 showed high and specific uptake in both the tumour and the pancreas. Uptake in the tumour remained high (15.2 ± 4.8%IA/g at 1 h; 11.7 ± 2.4%IA/g at 4 h), whereas a relatively fast washout from the pancreas and the other abdominal organs was observed. Uptake in the pancreas decreased rapidly from 22.6 ± 4.7%IA/g at 1 h to 1.5 ± 0.5%IA/g at 4 h. CONCLUSION:RM2 was shown to be a potent GRPr antagonist. Pharmacokinetics and imaging studies indicate that (111)In-RM2 and (68)Ga-RM2 are ideal candidates for clinical SPECT and PET studies.
Authors: C Van de Wiele; F Dumont; R Vanden Broecke; W Oosterlinck; V Cocquyt; R Serreyn; S Peers; J Thornback; G Slegers; R A Dierckx Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Date: 2000-11
Authors: Rosalba Mansi; Xuejuan Wang; Flavio Forrer; Stefan Kneifel; Maria-Luisa Tamma; Beatrice Waser; Renzo Cescato; Jean Claude Reubi; Helmut R Maecke Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2009-08-11 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Christian Lohrmann; Hanwen Zhang; Daniel L J Thorek; Pooja Desai; Pat B Zanzonico; Joseph O'Donoghue; Christopher P Irwin; Thomas Reiner; Jan Grimm; Wolfgang A Weber Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2015-04-03 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Rajendra Prasad Bandari; Zongrun Jiang; Tamila Stott Reynolds; Nicole E Bernskoetter; Ashley F Szczodroski; Kurt J Bassuner; Daniel L Kirkpatrick; Tammy L Rold; Gary L Sieckman; Timothy J Hoffman; James P Connors; Charles J Smith Journal: Nucl Med Biol Date: 2014-01-10 Impact factor: 2.408
Authors: Jens Kurth; Bernd Joachim Krause; Sarah M Schwarzenböck; Carina Bergner; Oliver W Hakenberg; Martin Heuschkel Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2019-09-03 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Ying Li; Zhibo Liu; Curtis W Harwig; Maral Pourghiasian; Joseph Lau; Kuo-Shyan Lin; Paul Schaffer; Francois Benard; David M Perrin Journal: Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2013-01-05