Amit Tirosh1, Georgios Z Papadakis2, Corina Millo3, Dima Hammoud3, Samira M Sadowski4, Peter Herscovitch3, Karel Pacak5, Stephen J Marx5, Lily Yang6, Pavel Nockel6, Jasmine Shell6, Patience Green6, Xavier M Keutgen7, Dhaval Patel6, Naris Nilubol6, Electron Kebebew8. 1. Endocrine Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel. 2. PET Imaging Center, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, Maryland; Institute of Computer Science (ICS), Foundation for Research and Technology Hellas (FORTH), Crete, Greece. 3. PET Imaging Center, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, Maryland. 4. Endocrine and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland. 5. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland. 6. Endocrine Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland. 7. Endocrine Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland; Department of Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois. 8. Endocrine Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland; Department of Surgery, The George Washington University, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, District of Columbia. Electronic address: kebebewe@mail.nih.gov.
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Survival times vary among patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) - even among those with the same site, stage, and grade of primary tumor. This makes it difficult to select treatment for patients with unresectable NETs because some patients can survive decades without treatment. 68Gallium-DOTATATE positron emission tomography with computed tomography (68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT) is a sensitive imaging technique for detection of NETs. We investigated the prognostic accuracy of 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT-based analysis of tumor volume in patients with NETs. METHODS: We performed a prospective study of 184 patients with NETs (128 [69.6%] with metastases and 11 patients [6.0%] with locally advanced disease) at the National Institutes of Health Clinical Center (Bethesda, MD) from 2013 through 2017. All patients underwent 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT image analysis and total 68Ga-DOTATATE-Avid tumor volume (68Ga-DOTATATE TV) was determined. We also measured fasting serum chromogranin A, neuron-specific enolase, gastrin, glucagon, vasoactive intestinal peptide, pancreatic polypeptide, and 24-hour urinary 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid levels in all patients. Disease progression was defined as a new lesion or a growth of a known lesion during the interval between baseline 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT scan and follow-up imaging (14.0 ± 6.1 months; range, 1-35 months). The primary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS) and disease-specific mortality during a median follow-up time of 18 months (range, 4-35 months). RESULTS: We found an inverse correlation between quartiles of 68Ga-DOTATATE TV and PFS (P = .001) and disease-specific survival (P = .002). A 68Ga-DOTATATE TV of 7.0 mL or more was associated with higher odds of disease progression (hazard ratio, 3.0; P = .04). A 68Ga-DOTATATE TV of 35.8 mL or more was associated with increased risk of disease-specific death (hazard ratio, 10.6) in multivariable analysis (P = .01), as well as in subgroup analysis of patients with pancreatic NETs. CONCLUSIONS: In a prospective study, we demonstrated the prognostic utility of 68Ga-DOTATATE TV in a large cohort of patients with NETs, in terms of PFS and disease-specific mortality.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Survival times vary among patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) - even among those with the same site, stage, and grade of primary tumor. This makes it difficult to select treatment for patients with unresectable NETs because some patients can survive decades without treatment. 68Gallium-DOTATATE positron emission tomography with computed tomography (68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT) is a sensitive imaging technique for detection of NETs. We investigated the prognostic accuracy of 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT-based analysis of tumor volume in patients with NETs. METHODS: We performed a prospective study of 184 patients with NETs (128 [69.6%] with metastases and 11 patients [6.0%] with locally advanced disease) at the National Institutes of Health Clinical Center (Bethesda, MD) from 2013 through 2017. All patients underwent 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT image analysis and total 68Ga-DOTATATE-Avid tumor volume (68Ga-DOTATATE TV) was determined. We also measured fasting serum chromogranin A, neuron-specific enolase, gastrin, glucagon, vasoactive intestinal peptide, pancreatic polypeptide, and 24-hour urinary 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid levels in all patients. Disease progression was defined as a new lesion or a growth of a known lesion during the interval between baseline 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT scan and follow-up imaging (14.0 ± 6.1 months; range, 1-35 months). The primary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS) and disease-specific mortality during a median follow-up time of 18 months (range, 4-35 months). RESULTS: We found an inverse correlation between quartiles of 68Ga-DOTATATE TV and PFS (P = .001) and disease-specific survival (P = .002). A 68Ga-DOTATATE TV of 7.0 mL or more was associated with higher odds of disease progression (hazard ratio, 3.0; P = .04). A 68Ga-DOTATATE TV of 35.8 mL or more was associated with increased risk of disease-specific death (hazard ratio, 10.6) in multivariable analysis (P = .01), as well as in subgroup analysis of patients with pancreatic NETs. CONCLUSIONS: In a prospective study, we demonstrated the prognostic utility of 68Ga-DOTATATE TV in a large cohort of patients with NETs, in terms of PFS and disease-specific mortality.
Authors: Samira M Sadowski; Vladimir Neychev; Corina Millo; Joanna Shih; Naris Nilubol; Peter Herscovitch; Karel Pacak; Stephen J Marx; Electron Kebebew Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2015-12-28 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Eric Raymond; Laetitia Dahan; Jean-Luc Raoul; Yung-Jue Bang; Ivan Borbath; Catherine Lombard-Bohas; Juan Valle; Peter Metrakos; Denis Smith; Aaron Vinik; Jen-Shi Chen; Dieter Hörsch; Pascal Hammel; Bertram Wiedenmann; Eric Van Cutsem; Shem Patyna; Dongrui Ray Lu; Carolyn Blanckmeister; Richard Chao; Philippe Ruszniewski Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-02-10 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: James C Yao; Manal Hassan; Alexandria Phan; Cecile Dagohoy; Colleen Leary; Jeannette E Mares; Eddie K Abdalla; Jason B Fleming; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Asif Rashid; Douglas B Evans Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-06-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Jiangyuan Yu; Nan Li; Jie Li; Ming Lu; Jeffrey P Leal; Huangying Tan; Hua Su; Yang Fan; Yan Zhang; Wei Zhao; Hua Zhu; Martin G Pomper; Yun Zhou; Zhi Yang Journal: Mol Imaging Biol Date: 2019-10 Impact factor: 3.488
Authors: Mythili P Pathipati; Thomas K Yohannan; Lu Tian; Kathleen Hornbacker; Jalen A Benson; Gerald J Berry; Natalie S Lui; Pamela L Kunz; Sukhmani K Padda Journal: Lung Cancer Date: 2021-01-23 Impact factor: 5.705