Literature DB >> 27516070

Clinical usefulness and patient satisfaction with a musculoskeletal ultrasound clinic: results of a 6-month pilot service in a Rheumatology Unit.

Carlos Acebes1,2, John P Harvie3, Alison Wilson3, Janet Duthie3, Fran Bowen3, Malcolm Steven3.   

Abstract

There is no agreement among the rheumatology community in how to implement the musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSUS) technique in the Rheumatology Divisions. To test the perceived usefulness of the MSUS, under consensus indications, for referring colleagues for the clinical management of their patients with inflammatory arthritis (IA) and to score the satisfaction level of the patients with different aspects of the ultrasound (US) examination, after attend to the MSUS clinic. A written questionnaire-based survey regarding the usefulness and satisfaction with the implementation of a pilot MSUS clinic in a Rheumatology Unit. Over a 6-month period, 43 patients attended 10 MSUS clinics. Referral agreed indications were: US assisting in early/subclinical diagnosis (35 %), decision making with patient treatment (44 %), monitoring of disease activity/treatment response (39 %) and US-guided injection (11 %). Average scores of the referrers regarding usefulness of the information provided for the US for these indications were 8.0, 8.3, 8.7 and 8.6, respectively, with a high score of 9.0 regarding the valuable support of the US for the management of their patients with IA. Patient satisfaction scores in responders (44 %) were averaged 9.5 and higher for receiving an adequate explanation of the US procedure, indications, US findings and their significance, lack of discomfort and length of the appointment. The average score was slightly lower (8.5) for the waiting time frame for the appointment for the MSUS examination. The referrers expressed a perception of usefulness of our pilot US clinic, under previous consensus indications, for the clinical management of their patients with IA. In addition, this MSUS clinic seemed to show a good acceptability and a high satisfaction scores for the patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Inflammatory arthritis; Rheumatology; Ultrasound

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27516070     DOI: 10.1007/s00296-016-3538-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rheumatol Int        ISSN: 0172-8172            Impact factor:   2.631


  17 in total

1.  The impact of ultrasonography on diagnosis and management of patients with musculoskeletal conditions.

Authors:  Z Karim; R J Wakefield; P G Conaghan; C A Lawson; E Goh; M A Quinn; P Astin; P O'Connor; W W Gibbon; P Emery
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2001-12

Review 2.  Clinical evaluation versus ultrasonography: who is the winner?

Authors:  Walter Grassi
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.666

3.  Musculoskeletal ultrasonography in Europe: results of a rheumatologist-based survey at a EULAR meeting.

Authors:  R J Wakefield; E Goh; P G Conaghan; Z Karim; P Emery
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2003-06-16       Impact factor: 7.580

4.  Current state of musculoskeletal ultrasound training and implementation in Europe: results of a survey of experts and scientific societies.

Authors:  Esperanza Naredo; Maria A D'Agostino; Philip G Conaghan; Marina Backhaus; Peter Balint; George A W Bruyn; Emilio Filippucci; Walter Grassi; Hilde B Hammer; Annamaria Iagnocco; David Kane; Juhani M Koski; Marcin Szkudlarek; Lene Terslev; Richard J Wakefield; Hans-Rudolf Ziswiler; Wolfgang A Schmidt
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2010-09-13       Impact factor: 7.580

5.  Role of diagnostic ultrasound in the assessment of musculoskeletal diseases.

Authors:  Pravin Patil; Bhaskar Dasgupta
Journal:  Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 5.346

6.  Power Doppler ultrasound, but not low-field magnetic resonance imaging, predicts relapse and radiographic disease progression in rheumatoid arthritis patients with low levels of disease activity.

Authors:  Violaine Foltz; Frédérique Gandjbakhch; Fabien Etchepare; Carole Rosenberg; Marie Laure Tanguy; Sylvie Rozenberg; Pierre Bourgeois; Bruno Fautrel
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2012-01

7.  Ultrasonography is superior to clinical examination in the detection and localization of knee joint effusion in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  David Kane; Peter V Balint; Roger D Sturrock
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.666

8.  EULAR recommendations for the use of imaging of the joints in the clinical management of rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Alexandra N Colebatch; Christopher John Edwards; Mikkel Østergaard; Désirée van der Heijde; Peter V Balint; Maria-Antonietta D'Agostino; Kristina Forslind; Walter Grassi; Espen A Haavardsholm; Glenn Haugeberg; Anne-Grethe Jurik; Robert B M Landewé; Esperanza Naredo; Philip J O'Connor; Ben Ostendorf; Kristina Potocki; Wolfgang A Schmidt; Josef S Smolen; Sekib Sokolovic; Iain Watt; Philip G Conaghan
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 19.103

9.  Improvement in diagnosis and management of musculoskeletal conditions with one-stop clinic-based ultrasonography.

Authors:  Sumeet Agrawal; Shweta S Bhagat; Bhaskar Dasgupta
Journal:  Mod Rheumatol       Date:  2008-10-07       Impact factor: 3.023

Review 10.  Ultrasound in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Chiara Rizzo; Fulvia Ceccarelli; Angelica Gattamelata; Caterina Vavala; Guido Valesini; Annamaria Iagnocco
Journal:  Med Ultrason       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.611

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.