OBJECTIVE: To document the current state of musculoskeletal US (MSUS) training and extent of implementation among rheumatologists in the member countries of EULAR. METHODS: An English-language questionnaire, divided into five sections (demographics, clinical use of MSUS, overall MSUS training for rheumatologists, MSUS education in the rheumatology training curriculum and education in MSUS offered by the national rheumatology society) was sent by e-mail to three different groups: (i) all national rheumatology societies of EULAR; (ii) all national societies of the European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology; and (iii) 19 senior rheumatologists involved in MSUS training from 14 European countries. RESULTS: Thirty-one (70.5%) out of 44 countries responded to the questionnaire (59.1% of national rheumatology societies, 34.5% of the national US societies and 100% of expert ultrasonographers). Rheumatology was listed among medical specialties that mainly perform MSUS in 20 (64.5%) countries; however, in most [19 (63.3%)] countries<10% of rheumatologists routinely perform MSUS in clinical practice. Training varies widely from country to country, with low rates of competency assessment. MSUS education is part of the rheumatology training curriculum in over half the surveyed countries, being compulsory in 7 (22.6%) countries and optional in 11 (35.5%). CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the high uptake of MSUS across Europe. The reported variation in training and practice between countries suggests a need for standardization in areas including training guidelines.
OBJECTIVE: To document the current state of musculoskeletal US (MSUS) training and extent of implementation among rheumatologists in the member countries of EULAR. METHODS: An English-language questionnaire, divided into five sections (demographics, clinical use of MSUS, overall MSUS training for rheumatologists, MSUS education in the rheumatology training curriculum and education in MSUS offered by the national rheumatology society) was sent by e-mail to three different groups: (i) all national rheumatology societies of EULAR; (ii) all national societies of the European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology; and (iii) 19 senior rheumatologists involved in MSUS training from 14 European countries. RESULTS: Thirty-one (70.5%) out of 44 countries responded to the questionnaire (59.1% of national rheumatology societies, 34.5% of the national US societies and 100% of expert ultrasonographers). Rheumatology was listed among medical specialties that mainly perform MSUS in 20 (64.5%) countries; however, in most [19 (63.3%)] countries<10% of rheumatologists routinely perform MSUS in clinical practice. Training varies widely from country to country, with low rates of competency assessment. MSUS education is part of the rheumatology training curriculum in over half the surveyed countries, being compulsory in 7 (22.6%) countries and optional in 11 (35.5%). CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the high uptake of MSUS across Europe. The reported variation in training and practice between countries suggests a need for standardization in areas including training guidelines.
Authors: Marwin Gutierrez; Cristina Hernandez-Diaz; Lucio Ventura-Rios; Lina María Saldarriaga-Rivera; Santiago Ruta; Magaly Alva; Claudia Mora -Trujillo; Wilkerson Pérez; Henry Terrazas; Rodolfo Del Carmen Arape Toyo; Maritza Quintero; Carla Solano; Oscar Sedano Santiago; Janet Grisel Huamán Sotomayor; Cesar Cefferino; Guillermo E Py; Marcelo J Audisio; Walter Javier Spindler; Horacio Berman; Carla Airoldi; Rómulo Wong; Ana Laura Álvarez Del Castillo Araujo; Mario E Díaz; Carmen Cerón Villaquiran; Rubén Darío Mantilla; José Alexandre Mendonça; Inês Guimarães da Silveira; Aline Defaveri do Prado; Melissa Cláudia Bisi; Violeta Rosario; Jeannette Medrano-Sánchez; Roberto Muñoz-Louis; Ana Cecilia Lozada-Navarro; Araceli Bernal; Maribel Lozano; Carlos Pineda Journal: Clin Rheumatol Date: 2016-08-30 Impact factor: 2.980
Authors: Christina Duftner; Claudia Schüller-Weidekamm; Peter Mandl; Thomas Nothnagl; Michael Schirmer; Franz Kainberger; Klaus Machold; Christian Dejaco Journal: Rheumatol Int Date: 2013-09-26 Impact factor: 2.631
Authors: Carlos Acebes; John P Harvie; Alison Wilson; Janet Duthie; Fran Bowen; Malcolm Steven Journal: Rheumatol Int Date: 2016-08-11 Impact factor: 2.631
Authors: Peter Mandl; Asta Baranauskaite; Nemanja Damjanov; Maja Hojnik; Reka Kurucz; Orsolya Nagy; Petr Nemec; Dora Niedermayer; Porin Perić; Tzvetanka Petranova; Andres Pille; Simona Rednic; Violeta Vlad; Martin Zlnay; Peter V Balint Journal: Rheumatol Int Date: 2016-02-29 Impact factor: 2.631
Authors: Peter Mandl; Anna Ciechomska; L Terslev; Xenofon Baraliakos; P G Conaghan; Maria Antonietta D'Agostino; Annamaria Iagnocco; Conny J van der Laken; Mikkel Ostergaard; E Naredo Journal: RMD Open Date: 2019-06-25
Authors: Francisca Sivera; Sofia Ramiro; Nada Cikes; Maurizio Cutolo; Maxime Dougados; Laure Gossec; Tore K Kvien; Ingrid E Lundberg; Peter Mandl; Arumugam Moorthy; Sonia Panchal; José A P da Silva; Johannes W Bijlsma Journal: Arthritis Res Ther Date: 2016-09-23 Impact factor: 5.156