OBJECTIVE: To document the practice of musculoskeletal ultrasound (US) by a sample of European rheumatologists attending an annual general meeting of the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR). METHODS: English-language questionnaires were distributed to 180 randomly selected participants attending imaging-related sessions at the XIV EULAR meeting in Glasgow, UK, in 1999. The questionnaire was divided into four sections: Demographics, Education and Training, Current Practice, and Equipment. RESULTS: Ninety-two rheumatologists responded, representing 74 centres from 19 European countries. Seventy-eight (85%) of the respondents either already used US in their clinical practice or would like to use it in the future. Thirty-seven (40%) respondents performed US within their own department. Few had received training at undergraduate level and most had learned informally or by attending courses. Scans were considered most useful for large joints and ligaments/tendons. Only 28 (30%) respondents valued US for guided injections. CONCLUSIONS: This study, although containing an element of selection bias, confirms a great interest in musculoskeletal US by rheumatologists across Europe and a demand which is likely to increase. The reported variation in training and practice between countries suggests a need for standardized training guidelines.
OBJECTIVE: To document the practice of musculoskeletal ultrasound (US) by a sample of European rheumatologists attending an annual general meeting of the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR). METHODS: English-language questionnaires were distributed to 180 randomly selected participants attending imaging-related sessions at the XIV EULAR meeting in Glasgow, UK, in 1999. The questionnaire was divided into four sections: Demographics, Education and Training, Current Practice, and Equipment. RESULTS: Ninety-two rheumatologists responded, representing 74 centres from 19 European countries. Seventy-eight (85%) of the respondents either already used US in their clinical practice or would like to use it in the future. Thirty-seven (40%) respondents performed US within their own department. Few had received training at undergraduate level and most had learned informally or by attending courses. Scans were considered most useful for large joints and ligaments/tendons. Only 28 (30%) respondents valued US for guided injections. CONCLUSIONS: This study, although containing an element of selection bias, confirms a great interest in musculoskeletal US by rheumatologists across Europe and a demand which is likely to increase. The reported variation in training and practice between countries suggests a need for standardized training guidelines.
Authors: Marwin Gutierrez; Cristina Hernandez-Diaz; Lucio Ventura-Rios; Lina María Saldarriaga-Rivera; Santiago Ruta; Magaly Alva; Claudia Mora -Trujillo; Wilkerson Pérez; Henry Terrazas; Rodolfo Del Carmen Arape Toyo; Maritza Quintero; Carla Solano; Oscar Sedano Santiago; Janet Grisel Huamán Sotomayor; Cesar Cefferino; Guillermo E Py; Marcelo J Audisio; Walter Javier Spindler; Horacio Berman; Carla Airoldi; Rómulo Wong; Ana Laura Álvarez Del Castillo Araujo; Mario E Díaz; Carmen Cerón Villaquiran; Rubén Darío Mantilla; José Alexandre Mendonça; Inês Guimarães da Silveira; Aline Defaveri do Prado; Melissa Cláudia Bisi; Violeta Rosario; Jeannette Medrano-Sánchez; Roberto Muñoz-Louis; Ana Cecilia Lozada-Navarro; Araceli Bernal; Maribel Lozano; Carlos Pineda Journal: Clin Rheumatol Date: 2016-08-30 Impact factor: 2.980
Authors: Christina Duftner; Claudia Schüller-Weidekamm; Peter Mandl; Thomas Nothnagl; Michael Schirmer; Franz Kainberger; Klaus Machold; Christian Dejaco Journal: Rheumatol Int Date: 2013-09-26 Impact factor: 2.631
Authors: José Andrés Román Ivorra; Juan Antonio Martínez; Pablo Lázaro; Federico Navarro; Antonio Fernandez-Nebro; Eugenio de Miguel; Estibaliz Loza; Loreto Carmona Journal: Rheumatol Int Date: 2013-04-09 Impact factor: 2.631